Scholarships in Thailand for ASEAN Integration: A Three Horizons Analysis of Evolution and Future Trajectories

Abstract

Scholarships are vital for promoting regional integration and human capital development within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). This study utilizes the Three Horizons framework to assess the evolution and future of Thailand's scholarship programs in the context of ASEAN's educational cooperation. Through 27 stakeholder surveys and 18 semi-structured interviews, we explore three temporal dimensions: current challenges (Horizon 1), transitional innovations (Horizon 2), and future aspirations (Horizon 3). Our findings highlight ongoing issues, including limited outbound mobility, unequal access, weak private sector involvement, and fragmented policies. By employing the Glonacal Agency Heuristic, we investigate how local, national, and regional actors influence scholarship governance, mapping governance and evolutionary trajectories. Strategic recommendations focus on inclusive design, efficient administration, varied funding, and alignment with ASEAN objectives. By viewing scholarships as instruments of knowledge diplomacy and regional solidarity, this research offers valuable insights for enhancing educational cooperation across ASEAN.

Keywords

ASEAN integration Glonacal agency heuristic scholarship Thailand Three Horizons framework

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acharya

(2021). ASEAN and regional order: Revisiting security community in Southeast Asia (1st ed.). Routledge.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2018). ASEAN Work Plan on Education 2016–2020. ASEAN Secretariat.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2022). Roadmap on the ASEAN Higher Education Space 2025. https://asean.org/asean-roadmap-2025-to-realise-a-common-higher-education-space-in-southeast-asia/.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2025). The future of higher education student mobility in Southeast Asia: Possibilities for an intra-ASEAN scholarship programme. https://asean.org/book/the-future-of-higher-education-student-mobility-in-southeast-asia-possibilities-for-an-intra-asean-scholarship-programme/.

ASEAN University Network Secretariat. (2023). AUN-DPPnet. https://www.aunsec.org/aun-dppnet/.

Atherton

Crosling

Shuib

Norbaya Azizan

Perring

Gibbs

McDermott

Chao

R. Y.

(2020). Study on enhancing intra-ASEAN university student mobility. The European Union Support to Higher Education in the ASEAN Region (SHARE).

Chan

S.-J.

(2012). Shifting patterns of student mobility in Asia. Higher Education Policy, 25(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.3

Chankseliani

(2022). International development higher education: Looking from the past, looking to the future. Oxford Review of Education, 48(4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2022.2077325

Chankseliani

Sopromadze

(2023). Listening to locals: Regional spaces in higher education in the global south. International Journal of Educational Research, 122, 102264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102264

10.

Chao

R. Y.

(2017). Mobility, mutual recognition and ASEAN community building: The road to sustainable ASEAN integration. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 6(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.14425/jice.2017.6.2.105

11.

Chao

R. Y.

(2023). Intra-ASEAN student mobility: Overview, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(5), 1736–1751. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2019-0178

12.

Chirathivat

Cheewatrakoolpong

(2015). Thailand's economic integration with neighboring countries and possible connectivity with South Asia (ADBI Working Paper No. 520). Asian Development Bank Institute. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/159839/adbi-wp520.pdf.

13.

Chou

M. H.

Ravinet

(2017). Higher education regionalism in Europe and Southeast Asia: Comparing policy ideas. Policy and Society, 36(1), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1278874

14.

Corbin

Strauss

(2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

15.

Cuyvers

Steenkamp

Viviers

Rossouw

Cameron

(2017). Identifying Thailand’s high-potential export opportunities in ASEAN+3 countries. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 16(1), 2–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-09-2016-0019

16.

Dang

Q. A.

(2017). Unintended outcomes of the EHEA and ASEAN: Peripheral members and their façade conformity. In Curaj

Deca

Pricopie

(Eds.), European higher education area: The impact of past and future policies (pp. 401–420). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_25

17.

Espiritu

Natividad

M. C.

Velasco

(2024). Data-driven decision making in scholarship programs: Leveraging decision trees and clustering algorithms. International Journal in Information Technology in Governance, Education and Business, 6(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.32664/ijitgeb.v6i1.134

18.

Goldrick-Rab

Harris

D. N.

Trostel

P. A.

(2009). Why financial aid matters (or does not) for college success: Toward a new interdisciplinary perspective. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 1–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9628-0_1

19.

Kabir

A. H.

(2023). Researching elite interviewing in higher education in postcolonial Bangladesh. The Qualitative Report, 28(1), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.6008

20.

Kent

(2018). Recent trends in international scholarships. In Dassin

Marsh

Mawer

(Eds.), International scholarships in higher education (pp. 23–42). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62734-2_2

21.

Khalid

Ali

A. J.

Nordin

N. M.

Shah

S. F. H.

(2019). Regional cooperation in higher education: Can it lead ASEAN toward harmonization? Southeast Asian Studies, 8(1), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.8.1_81

22.

Knight

(2006). Internationalization of higher education: New directions, new challenges. Palgrave Macmillan.

23.

Knight

(2014). International education hubs: Student, talent, knowledge-innovation models. Springer.

24.

Koenig

Seneque

Sharpe

Ash-Harper

Bergheim

(2022). Three horizons meets presencing for inclusive, just and equitable futures. Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change, 2(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.47061/jabsc.v2i1.3355

25.

Koh

(2007). Deparochializing education: Globalization, regionalization, and the formation of an ASEAN education space. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300701289144

26.

Kosmuetzky

Nokkala

(2020). Towards a methodology discourse in comparative higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 74, 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12257

27.

Lawrence

(2020). China’s higher education governance during COVID: A mixed-methods study of policy analysis and student perspectives. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(4), 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-05-2020-0115

28.

López-Rodríguez

M. D.

Jiménez-Aceituno

Quintas-Soriano

Requena-Mullor

J. M.

Garau

(2024). Applying the Three Horizons approach in local and regional scenarios to support policy coherence in SDG implementation: Insights from arid Spain. Global Environmental Change, 89, 102922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102922

29.

Malterud

Siersma

V. D.

Guassora

A. D.

(2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

30.

Marginson

(2014). International students: The United Kingdom drops the ball. International Higher Education, 76(Summer 2014), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2014.76.5522

31.

Marginson

(2022). Space and scale in higher education: The glonacal agency heuristic revisited. Higher Education, 84(6), 1365–1395. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2014.76.5522

32.

Marginson

Rhoades

(2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014699605875

33.

Melissen

(Ed.) (2005). The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations. https://culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/pdf/research/books/soft_power/The_New_Public_Diplomacy.pdf.

34.

Ministry of Education Thailand. (2010). Education in Thailand 2010. Ministry of Education.

35.

Okhuysen

G. A.

Bonardi

J.-P.

(2011). The challenges of building theory by combining lenses . Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.36.1.zok006

36.

Parker

T. L.

Shakespeare

C. G.

Quiroz-Livanis

(2020). The CUNY remediation debate and coalitions: Information matters. Educational Policy, 36(7), 1528–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820981932

37.

Pham

H. H.

(2022). Further understanding on international student mobilities in Asia is needed. Journal of International Students, 12(2), i–iv. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12i2.4898

38.

Probst

(2015). The eye regards itself: Benefits and challenges of reflexivity in qualitative social work research. Social Work Research, 39(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svu028

39.

Rubin

P. G.

Billings

M. S.

Hammond

Gandara

(2022). State higher education funding during COVID-19: Exploring state-level characteristics influencing financing decisions. American Behavioral Scientist, 66(12), 1687–1707. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221118270

40.

Sabzalieva

(2016). Public policy and the attraction of international students. Centre for the Study of Canadian and International Higher Education, OISE–University of Toronto

41.

SEAMEO RIHED. (2024). Asian International Mobility for Students (AIMS) Programme. http://rihed.seameo.org/aims/.

42.

SEAMEO Secretariat. (2024). Pre-service student teacher exchange. https://www.seameo.org/.

43.

Sharpe

(2013). Three horizons: The patterning of hope. International Futures Forum.

44.

Sirat

(2017). ASEAN’s flagship universities and regional integration initiatives. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 11(2), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-07-2017-0004

45.

UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. UNESCO.

46.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (n.d.). Global Flow of Tertiary-Level Students. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. http://uis.unesco.org/en/uis-student-flow.

47.

Vuong

Q.-H.

Pham

H.-H.

Dong

T.-K.-T.

M.-T.

Dinh

V.-H.

(2021). Current trends and realities of international students in East and Southeast Asia: The cases of China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(3), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.93.532.549

48.

Wilson

(2015). Ends changed, means retained: Scholarship programs, political influence, and drifting goals. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 17(1), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12012

49.

Zheng

(2022). Examining China’s academic narratives surrounding higher education internationalization in foreign countries: A multi-theoretical lens. Journal of Studies in International Education, 27(3), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153221082719

50.

Yodpet

Salvador Quetzal

Siek

Vebrina Sihite

Alegado

P. J. E.

Balakrishnan

Green

Hollings

(2022). International education within ASEAN and the rise of Asian century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2080545

51.

Yorke

Vidovich

(2016). Theoretical frameworks for policy analysis. In Frawley

Fasoli

Arbon

Rowlands

(Eds.), Working together in sport and education: Collaborative community approaches (pp. 47–64). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32924-6_4