The emigration of skilled and able workers from Russia markedly increased in the last five years, prompting Russian scholars to reassess the phenomenon of brain drain, its definition, scope, consequences and causes. This article finds that the perceived connection between increasing `brain drain’ from Russia and the internationalization of higher education in Russia has played an important role in recent debates. From an analysis of Russian scholarly articles and transcripts of interviews with Russian educators directly involved in internationalization, this study finds that despite the evident concern amongst the Russian academic community about the nexus between internationalization and brain drain, emigration is still seen as a perfect choice for an individual who is skilled and able. This ambivalent attitude towards `brain drain’ has created a situation where some Russian academics use it to justify their resistance to internationalization assuming a causal relationship between the two, while others, by word and deed, support internationalization as a means of curbing emigration. In the context of controversial educational reforms underway in Russia since the 1990s, such perceptions have helped internationalization survive.
Anonymous 1. (2017). Interview with a Russian university professor working with a double degree programme; conducted in 2017.
2.
Anonymous 2. (2017). Interview with a Russian university professor working with a double degree programme; conducted in 2017.
3.
Anonymous 3. (2017). Interview with a Russian university professor working with a double degree programme; conducted in 2017.
4.
AyzenshtadtA. M. (2008). Naskol’ko polno programmy dvoynogo diploma realizuyut vopros mobil’nosti studentov kak odin iz vazhneyshikh printsipiv Bolonskogo protsessa? Ne privedet li vypolnenie programmy dvoynogo diploma k total’noy “utechke mozgov” iz strany? [To What Extent Do Double Degree Programmes Promote Students’ Mobility as an Important Principle of the Bologna Process? Will Implementation of Double Degree Programme Result in Total “Brain Drain” from the Country?]. Akkreditatsiya v obrazovanii, 20, 18–19.
5.
BadulinV. D. (2013). Programmy “dvoynogo diploma”: opyt, problemy i perspektivy [“Double Degree” Programmes: Experience, Problems, and Prospects]. Mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya i torgovaya politika, 11–12, 177–185.
6.
BaumanZ. (1991). Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
7.
BokovL. A. (2013). Problemy sootvetstviya gosudarstvennym obrazovatel’nym standartam pri realizatsii programm dvoynykh diplomov [Problems with Compliance with State Educational Standards when Implementing Double Degree Programmes]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya, 1, 18–21.
8.
BoldenR.GoslingJ.O’BrienA. (2014). Citizens of the Academic Community? A Societal Perspective on Leadership in UK Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 754–770. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2012.754855.
9.
BoyarintsevV. I.FionovaL. K. (2009). Tretya truba [The Third Pipeline]. Konfliktologiya, 1, 194–200.
CaseJ. M.LightG. (2011). Emerging Methodologies in Engineering Education Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186–210.
12.
ChangS. L. (1992). Causes of Brain Drain and Solutions: The Taiwan Experience. Studies in Comparative International Development, 27, 27–43. DOI: 10.1007/BF02687103.
13.
ChankselianiM. (2018). Four Rationales of HE Internationalisation: Perspectives of U.K. Universities on Attracting Students From Former Soviet Countries. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22, 53–70. DOI: 10.1177/1028315317725806.
14.
DammI. A. (2016). Korruptsiya v sfere obrazovaniya: ponyatie, kharakternye cherty, formy i vidy [Corruption in Education: Definition, Characteristics, Forms and Types]. Aktual’nye problem ekonomiki i prava, 10, 5–17.
15.
De WitH. (2011). Internationalisation of Higher Education: Nine Microconcepts. International Higher Education, 64, 6–7.
16.
DemkinV. P.KingmaH.GermeraadW. T. V.RudenkoT. V.SendenN. H. M.SavelbergH. J. C. M.NyavroV. F. (2016). Mezhdunarodnaya magisterskaya programma dvoynogo diploma v oblasti fiziki i biomeditsiny: ot idei do praktiki [International Double Degree Master’s Programme in Physics and Biomedicine: From Idea to Practice]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Fizika, 59, 128–132.
17.
DocquierF.RapoportH. (2009). Documenting the Brain Drain of “La Creme de la Creme” Three Case-Studies on International Migration at the Upper Tail of the Education Distribution. Jahrbucher für Nationalökonomie und statistik, 229, 679–705.
18.
DruzhilovS. A. (2015). Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problem universitetskoy intelligentsia vo vremena reform: vzglyad prepodavatelya [Socio-Psychological Problems of University Intelligentsia in Times of Reforms: A Teacher’s View]. Montreal: Accent Graphics Communications.
19.
EklofB. (2005). Introduction, Russian Education: The Past in the Present. In EklofB. (Ed.), Educational Reform in Post-Soviet Russia: Legacies and Prospects (pp. 1–20). London: Frank Cass.
20.
FakhrutdinovaE. V.KolesnikovaY. S. (2010). Protivorechiya protsessa kommertsializatsii nematerial’noy sobstvennosti [Contradictions of Commercialization of Intangible Property]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo finansovo-ekonomicheskogo instituta, 3, 28–31.
21.
GalanA.AgasistiT. (2014). From Brain Drain to Knowledge Transfer: Experiences of the Italian Academe. International Migration, 52(4), 60–63.
22.
GanguliI. (2014). Scientific Brain Drain and Human Capital Formation after the End of the Soviet Union. International Migration, 52(5), 95–110.
23.
GishO. (1970). Britain and America: Brain Drains and Brain Gains. Social Science and Medicine, 3(3), 397–400.
24.
GKS, Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki [Federal Service of State Statistics]. (2018). Mezhdunarodnaya migratsiya [International Migration]. Retrieved June 5, 2020 from www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/demo/migr2.xls
25.
GrakhovV. P.MokhnachevS. A.IsakovaN. V.KislyakovaY. G.SimakovaU. F. (2014). Osobennosti realizatsii sovmestnykh obrazovatel’nykh programm dvoynykh diplomov [Features of Implementation of Joint Double Degree Programmes in Higher Education]. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya, 12–10, 2162–2168.
26.
GrigorievaO. V.VanyukhinaN. V. (2014). Programma dvukh diplomov: stimulirovanie utechki mozgov ili dopolnitel’nye vozmozhnosti na rodine [Double Degree Programme: Increasing Brain Drain or Creating More Opportunities in the Home Country]. In SalgamF.A., et al. (Eds.), Iskusstvo vzaimoponimaniya: formirovanie kul’tury mezhetnicheskikh otnosheniy itolerantnosti podrastayushchego pokoleniya [The Art of Mutual Understanding: Formation of Culture of Inter-Ethnic Relations and Tolerance among the New Generation](pp. 40–43).
27.
Kazan: Tamga. GrudzinskiA. O.BalabanovaY. S.PekushinaO. A. (2004). Evropeyskiy transfer tekhnologiy: kooperatsiya bez utechki mozgov [European Technology Transfer: Cooperation without Brain Drain]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 11, 123–131.
28.
GurievS.LivanovD.SeverinovK. (2009, December14). Shest’ mifov akademii nauk [6 myths of the Academy of Sciences]. Ekspert, 48(685). Retrieved June 5, 2020 from http://expert.ru/expert/2009/48/6mifov_akademii_nauk/
29.
HallP. (2005). Brain Drains and Brain Gains: Causes, Consequences, Policy. International Journal of Social Economics, 32, 939–950. DOI: 10.1108/03068290510623780.
30.
HauptA.JanebaE. (2009). Education, Redistributions, and the Threat of Brain Drain. International Tax and Public Finance, 16, 1–24. DOI: 10.1007/s10797-007-9054-8.
31.
JacobyD. S. (2018). Trump, Trade, and the End of Globalisation. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
32.
JohnsonD. (2010). Educational Reform in Russia: Culture, Context and Worldview. In JohnsonD. (Ed.), Politics, Modernisation and Educational Reform in Russia: From Past to Present (pp. 7–16). Oxford: Symposium Books.
33.
JohnsonA. (2016). The Educational Legacy of the Soviet Period. In JohnsonA. (Ed.), Education and Society in the New Russia (pp. 1–29). London and New York: Routledge.
34.
KalipeniE.SemuL. L.MbeliziM. A. (2012). The Brain Drain of Health Care Professionals from Sub-Saharan Africa: A Geographic Perspective. Progress in Development Studies, 12, 153–171. DOI: 10.1177/146499341101200305.
35.
KazantsevA. A.BorishpoletsK.P. (2013). Utechka mozgov iz Rossii kak politikoupravlencheskaya problema [Brain Drain from Russia as a Public Administration Issue]. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta, 6(33), 206–214.
36.
KhadriaB. (1990). Patents, Brain Drain and Higher Education: International Barriers to the Diffusion of Knowledge, Information and Technology. Social Scientist, 18, 3–18.
37.
KhlebenskikhL. V.SorokinaV. Y.YatsunenkoA. V. (2017). Vneshnyaya ugroza ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: itechka mozgov [External Threat to Economic Security of the Russian Federation: Brain Drain]. In Aktual’nye problemy pravovogo, ekonomicheskogo i sotsial’no-psikhologicheskogo znaniya: teoriya i praktika [Contemporary Issues of Legal, Economic and Socio-Psychological Knowledge: Theory and Practice] (pp. 229–235). Donetsk: Tsifrovaya topografiya.
38.
KhudoleyK. K.NovikovaI. N.LankoD. A. (2010). Innovative Education for the Baltic Region: The Experience of the Finnish-Russian Cross-border University. Baltic Region, 3(5), 15–20.
39.
KielyteJ.d’ArtisK. (2002). Migration in the Enlarged European Union: Empirical Evidence for Labour Mobility in the Baltic States. Journal of Baltic Studies, 33, 259–279. DOI: 10.1080/01629770200000091.
40.
KnightJ. (2011). Five Myths about Internationalisation. International Higher Education, 62, 14–15.
41.
KonstantinovG. N.FilonovichS. R. (2008). The Transformation of the Russian System of Higher Education. In BlumD. W. (Ed.) Russia and Globalisation: Identity, Security and Society in an Era of Change (pp. 139–152). Washington: Woodrow Wilson Centre Press.
42.
KuvshinovA. M. (2015). K voprosu o finansirovanii obucheniya za rubezhom v ramkakh programmy dvoynykh diplomov [Concerning Financing of Studies Abroad within Double Degree Programme – in Russian]. In MamchenkoY. V. (Ed.), Voprosy sovremennoy nauki: problem, tendentsii, perspektivy. Materialy II mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Issues of Contemporary Science: Problems, Tendencies, Prospects. Proceedings of the 2nd International Academic and Practical Conference] (pp. 50–54). Moscow: Pero.
43.
LevinV. I. (2012). Nauka i budushchee Rossii [Science and Russia’s Future]. Tsennosti i smysly, 6(22), 75–84.
44.
LisichkinaY. S.IvannikovaM. S. (2015). Osobennosti realizatsii programm dvoihykh diplomov v Rossii [Features of Implementation of Double Degree Programmes in Russia]. Naukograd: nauka, proizvodstvo, obshchestvo, 4, 56–60.
45.
LoktionovaY. A.YakushenkoV. M. (2013). Utechka mozgov iz Rossii: problema i puti resheniya [Brain Drain from Russia: The Problem and Possible Solutions]. Ekonomicheskaya sreda, 4(6), 148–153.
46.
MakeevaA. (2018, February5). V Rossii otchislili polovinu VUZov [Russia expelled half of its higher education institutions]. Kommersant-Daily. Retrieved June 5, 2020 from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3540086
47.
MäkinenS. (2016). In Search of the Status of an Educational Great Power? Analysis of Russia’s Educational Diplomacy Discourse. Problems of Post-Communism, 63, 183–196, DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2016.1172489.
48.
MamedovA. K. (2010). Utechka ili tsirkulyatsiya mozgov? [Drain or Circulation of Brain?]. Upravlenie megapolisom, 4, 31–34.
49.
ManokhinaN. V. (2012). Nauka kak zerkalo rossiyskogo obshchestva [Science as Mirror of Russian Society]. Vestnik Sarativskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2(41), 27–33.
50.
MarshR. R.OyelereR. U. (2018). Global Migration of Talents: Drain, Gain and Transnational Impact. In DassinJ. R.MarshR. R.MawerM. (Eds.), International Scholarship in Higher Education: Pathways to Social Change (pp. 209–234). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
51.
MitinD. N. (2011). Intellektual’naya migratsiya: sushchnost’, posledstviya i puti resheniya [Migration of Intellectuals: Nature, Consequences, and Possible Solutions]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov, seriya: politologiya, 1, 41–47.
52.
MokK. H.HanX. (2016). From “brain drain’ to “brain bridging’: transnational higher education development and graduate employment in China. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38, 369–389, DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2016.1174409.
53.
MunD. V. (2009). Neft’ v obmen na intellect – prichiny i posledstviya degradatsii trudovykh resursov Rossii [Oil for Brain: Causes and Consequences of Degradation of Labour Resources in Russia]. Nauchnye problem rumanitarnykh issledovaniy, 10, 109–115.
54.
MustafinaG. R. (2013). Utechka mozgov ili vliyanie krizisa idey na sovremennuyu ekonomiku Rossii [Brain Drain or the Influence of the Crisis of Ideas on Contemporary Russian Economy]. Problemy soveremennoy ekonomiki (Novosibirsk), 13, 192–196.
55.
MyersR. G. (1972). Education and Emigration: Study Abroad and the Migration of Human Resources. New York: McKay.
56.
O’BrienM. L. (2018). Migration as an Adaptive Response to Ethnic Nationalism in Russia. Migration Studies, 6, 187–204. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mnx039.
57.
OkoyeD. (2016). Can brain drain be good for human capital growth? Evidence from cross-country skill premiums and education costs. Economic Analysis and Policy, 49, 74–99.DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2015.12.002.
58.
ParryG. (2015). English Higher Education and Its Vocational Zones. Research in Comparative and International Education, 10, 493–509. DOI: 10.1177/1745499915612187.
59.
PoleshchukT. A.BezrukovI. S. (2011). Osobennosti demograficheskogo razvitiya Dal’nego Vostoka [Specific Features of Demographic Development of the Far East]. Aziatsko-tihookeanskiy region: Ekonomika, politika, pravo, 2, 44–51.
RajputJ. S. (2002). Brain Drain and Education Systems. Economic and Political Weekly, 37, 3404–3405.
62.
RakhmatullinaL. I.BabenkoK. Y. (2015). Problema utechki mozgov v Rossii [Issue of Brain Drain in Russia]. Evraziyskiy soyuz uchenykh, 5-2(14), 33–43.
63.
RientiesB. (2014). Understanding Academics’ Resistance towards (Online) Student Evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 987–1001. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2014.880777.
64.
RizviF. (2005). Rethinking “Brain Drain” in the Era of Globalisation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25, 175–192. DOI: 10.1080/02188790500337965.
65.
Roste, Regional Office for Science and Technology for Europe, UNESCO. (1994). Brain Drain Issues of Europe: Cases of Russia and Ukraine. Technical Report No. 18, Retrieved June 8, 2020 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0010/001002/100250eb.pdf
66.
RyazantsevS. V. (2009). O pritoke umov i utechke mozgov [On Inflow of Mind and Outflow of Brain]. Priroda, 6, 48–54.
67.
SavinaS. (2019). Drugoy Russiy Mir: issledovanie o tom, skol’ko rossiyan uezzhaet iz strany [Another Russian World: An Enquiry into How Many Russians Leave The Country]. Published on January 16. Retrieved June 8, 2020 from https://www.proekt.media/research/statistikaemigration/
68.
SaxenianA. L. (2005). From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation: Transnational Communities and Regional Upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61.
69.
ShenderovaS. V. (2016). Novyy format internatsionalizatsii: sovmestnye unversitety [New Format of Internationalisation: Joint Universities]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 6(106), 78–93.
70.
ShenderovaS. (2018). Permanent Uncertainty as Normality? Finnish-Russian Double Degrees in the Post-Crimea World. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40, 611–628. DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2018.1529134.
71.
ShestakovaN. N. (2014). O vliyanii utechki mozgov na formirovanie chelovecheskogo kapitala [Influence of Brain Drain on Human Capital Formation]. In SovershaevaL. P. (Ed.), Strukturnye reformy dlya stimulirovaniya rosta ekonomiki regionov: opyt Rossii I FRG [Structural Reforms Stimulating Regional Growth: Russian and German Experience] (pp. 113–117). St. Petersburg: Skifiya-Print.
72.
ShilovV. V.SergeevaT. N. (2017). Sokrashchenie utechki mozgov kak vazhnyy factor ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona: istorikosotsiologicheskiy aspekt [Reducing Brain Drain as an Important Factor of Economic Development of a Region: Historical and Sociological Aspect]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo, 1(78), 272–278.
73.
ShirinaT. G. (2016). Mezhdunarodnoe izmerenie vysshego obrazovaniya: iz opyta realizatsii [Implementation of “Double Degree” Programme]. Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo programmy “dvoynoy diplom” [International Dimension of Higher Education: Experience of universiteta imeni Yaroslava Mudrogo], 5(96), 122–125.
74.
ShishkovY. V. (2012). Vyzovy rossiyskoy demografii [Challenges of Russian Demography]. International Trends / Mezdunarodnye protsessy, 10(28), 106–110.
75.
SinyatkinI.MishinA.KarpukhinaE. (2010). Analysis of Double Degree Programmes between EU and Russian HEIs: Final Report (Russian version). Retrieved June 8, 2020 from http://www.spbstu.ru/upload/inter/final_report.pdf
76.
SobelmanI. I. (2000). O probleme utechki mozgov [On the Brain Drain Problem]. Fizicheskoe obrazovanie v VUZakh, 6(1), 52–53.
77.
SokolskiyO. E. (2011). Intellektual’nyy prazdnik – vspominaya obshchenie s Viktorom Markovichem Koganom [Intellectual Feast: Recalling Companionship with Viktor M. Kogan]. Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy vzglyad, 1, 26–29.
78.
SolovyevaY. N. (2016). Faktory uspekha mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva pri realizatsii program dvoynogo diploma [Factors of Success of International Cooperation Aimed at Implementation of Double Degree Programmes]. In Ekonomika Rossii v usloviyakh resursnykh organicheniy: sbornik nauchnykh trudov po itogam nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii molofykh uchenykh Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Russian Economyc under Conditions of Limited Resources: Collected Works of Participants of Conference of Young Scholars of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics] (pp. 545–549). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics.
79.
StarodubtsevA. V. (2017). How Does the Government Implement Unpopular Reforms?: Evidence from Education Policy in Russia. In Gel’manV. (Ed.), Authoritarian Modernization in Russia: Ideas, Institutions, and Policies (pp. 148–165). London and New York: Routledge.
80.
SteinbergD. (2017). Resource Shocks and Human Capital Stocks – Brain Drain or Brain Gain?Journal of Development Economics, 127, 250–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.04.001.
81.
TASS. (2018, 26May). Kotyukov: ustanovki megascience nado stroit’ v Rossii dlya privlecheniya luchshikh mirovykh uchenyh [Science and Higher Education Minister Kotyukov: Russia needs megascience projects to attract world’s best scholars]. TASS News Agency. Retrieved June 8, 2020 from http://tass.ru/pmef-2018/articles/5238536
82.
TeneyC. (2019). Immigration of Highly Skilled European Professional to Germany: Intra-EU Brain Gain or Brain Circulation?Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, forthcoming. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2019.1578197.
83.
TerekhovA. I. (2011). Nanotekhnologicheskie perspektivy Rossii: ot “nanobuma” k obyektivnym otsenkam [Nano-Technological Prospects of Russia: from “Nano-Boom” to Objective Assessments]. Obshchestvennye nauki I sovremennost’, 6, 49–63.
84.
TomicC. H.TaylorK. (2018). Youth Unemployment, the Brain Drain and Education Policy in Croatia: A Call for Joining Forces and for New Visions. Policy Futures in Education, 16, 501–514. DOI: 10.1177/1478210317751267.
85.
TomlinsonM. (2015). Between Instrumental and Developmental Learning: Ambivalence in Student Values and Identity Positions in Marketized UK Higher Education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(5), 569–88.
86.
WebbM. A. (1985). The Brain Drain and Education Opportunity in Less Developed Countries. Eastern Economic Journal, 11(2), 145–155.
87.
WebberS. L. (2000). School, Reform and Society in the New Russia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
88.
WeilerN. H. (2005). Ambivalence and the Politics of Knowledge: The Struggle for Change in German Higher Education. Higher Education, 49(1–2), 177–195.
89.
WöhrerV. (2014). To Stay or to Go? Narratives of Early-Stage Sociologists about Persisting in Academia. Higher Education Policy, 27, 469–487. DOI: 10.1057/hep.2014.22.
90.
World Bank. (2000). World Development Report, 2000/01. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
91.
ZhdankinN. A. (2016). Innovatsii dlya bor’by s utechkoy mozgov za rubezh [Innovations Countering Brain Drain Abroad]. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly), 6, 71–79.
92.
ZigurasC.GribbleC. (2016). Policy Responses to Address Student “Brain Drain”: An Assessment of Measures Intended to Reduce the Emigration of Singaporean International Students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(3), 246–264. DOI: 10.1177/1028315314561121.
ZigurasC.GribbleC. (2016). Policy responses to address student “brain drain”: An assessment of measures intended to reduce the emigration of Singaporean international students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(3), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315314561121
