Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

International scholarship programs for higher education attract a substantial body of funding each year from national governments, supranational bodies, large charitable foundations, higher education institutions, and many smaller organizations. With aims variously shaped by international development and public diplomacy considerations, international scholarships fund students at higher education institutions worldwide. As the investment in, and scope of, scholarship programs has expanded, concurrent commitment to analysis and evaluation of their outcomes—both to improve policy making and justify further funding—has increased. This article explores several of the key methodological and conceptual challenges in the evaluation of international scholarship outcomes, focusing on the relationship between aims and outcomes, difficulties with “attribution” and “contribution,” and scholarship programs in comparison with their alternatives. The relationship between evidence gathering and policy making is considered in context of international scholarship programs, and several potentially useful future developments in evaluation approaches are suggested.

Keywords

international exchange programs mobility of students and academic staff international scholarships fellowships evaluation international development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amos

Windham

de los Reyes

Jones

Baran

(2009). Delivering on the promise: An impact evaluation of the Gates Millennium Scholars Program. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Atkinson

(2010). Does soft power matter? A comparative analysis of student exchange programs 1980–2006. Foreign Policy Analysis, 6(1), 1-22. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00099.x

Boeren

(2012). Issues and trends in development cooperation programmes in higher education and research. Retrieved from https://www.nuffic.nl/en/library/issuas%20and-trends-in-development-cooperation-programmes-in-higher-education-and-research.pdf

British Council & Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst [DAAD]. (2014). The rationale for sponsoring students to undertake international study: An assessment of national student mobility scholarship programmes. Manchester, UK: British Council.

Brogden

(2014). A scholarship that follows its recipients home. Retrieved from http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/scholarship-follows-its-recipients-home

Bryant

Wrighton

(2008). Fiji and Tuvalu tracer study, 2008. Canberra, Australia: AusAID.

Byrne

(2013). Evaluating complex social interventions in a complex world. Evaluation, 19, 217-228. doi:10.1177/1356389013495617

Canadian International Development Agency. (2005). Evaluation of the Canadian Francophonie Scholarship Program (CFSP), 1987-2005: A need for reorientation. Gatineau, Quebec, Canada: Author.

Chesterfield

Dant

(2013). Evaluation of LAC Higher Education scholarships program: Final report. North Bethesda, MD: JBS International.

10.

Clifford

Miller

Stasz

Goldman

Sam

Kumar

(2013). How effective are different approaches to higher education provision in increasing access, quality and completion for students in developing countries? Does this differ by gender of students? A systematic review. London, England: EPPI-Centre, UCL Institute of Education.

11.

Clift

Dassin

Zurbuchen

(2013). Linking higher education and social change: Ford foundation international fellowship program. New York, NY: Ford Foundation International Fellowships Program.

12.

Cosentino

Dumitrescu

Moortby

Rangarajan

Shaw

Sloan

Burciul

(2013, September 10-12). Learning across borders: The collaborative creation of a monitoring, evaluation, and learning framework for the MasterCard Foundation Scholars Program. Presented at the UKFIET International Conference on Education and Development—“Education and Development Post-2015: Reflecting, Reviewing, Re-Visioning,” Oxford, UK.

13.

Damvad. (2014). Evaluation of the Quota scheme 2001-2012: Assessing impact in higher education and development. Oslo, Norway: Author.

14.

Day

Stackhouse

Geddes

(2009). Evaluating commonwealth scholarships in the United Kingdom: Assessing impact in key priority areas. London, England: Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the United Kingdom.

15.

Dobson

(2011). Being global: Making the case for international alumni relations. Washington, DC: Council for Advancement and Support of Education.

16.

Dong

Chapman

D. W.

(2008). The Chinese government scholarship program: An effective form of foreign assistance? International Review of Education, 54, 155-173. doi:10.1007/s11159-007-9075-7

17.

Enders

(2007). Mobilizing marginalized talent: The International Fellowships Program. International Higher Education, 46, 7-8.

18.

Enders

Kottmann

(2013). The International Fellowships Program: Experiences and outcomes. Enschede, NL: University of Twente.

19.

Hansen

Boeren

Lexow

Wirak

Sigvaldsen

Fergus

Hossain

(2005). Evaluation of the Norad Fellowship Programme. Oslo, Norway: Norad.

20.

Harle

(2011). Foundations for the future: Supporting the early careers of African researchers. London, England: The British Academy.

21.

Haugen

H. Ø

. (2013). China’s recruitment of African university students: Policy efficacy and unintended outcomes. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 11, 315-334. doi:10.1080/14767724.2012.750492

22.

Hilal

Scott

Maadad

(2015). The political, socio-economic and sociocultural impacts of the King Abdullah Scholarship Program (KASP) on Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Higher Education, 4, 254-267. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p254

23.

Kirkland

Ransom

Stackhouse

Taal

(2012). Report on the activities of Commonwealth Scholarship and Fellowship Plan 2009-2012: Results and recommendations from a survey of national nominating agencies. Presented at the 18th Conference of Commonwealth Education Ministers, Port Louis, Mauritius.

24.

Kritz

(2015). Why do students differ in their rates of outbound student mobility? Journal of Studies in International Education, 20, 99-117. doi:10.1177/1028315315587104

25.

Lehr

(2008). Ethical dilemmas in individual and collective rights-based approaches to tertiary education scholarships: The cases of Canada and Cuba. Comparative Education, 44, 425-444. doi:10.1080/03050060802481454

26.

Mansukhani

Handa

N. L.

(Eds.). (2013). Opening doors: Ten years of the Ford Foundation International Fellowships Program in India. New Delhi, India: Ford Foundation International Fellowships Program.

27.

Mawer

(2014). A study of research methodology used in evaluations of international scholarship schemes for higher education. London, England: Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the United Kingdom.

28.

Mayne

(2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18, 270-280. doi:10.1177/1356389012451663

29.

McGonagle

Schoeni

Couper

(2013). The effects of a between-wave incentive experiment on contact update and production outcomes in a panel study. Journal of Official Statistics, 29, 261-276. doi:10.2478/jos-2013-0022

30.

Mondino

(2011). An analysis of flagship scholarship programs—Policy, communication and performance in international comparison. San Carlos, CA: Illuminate Consulting Group.

31.

Monks

(2013). The Brazil Scientific Mobility undergraduate program in the United States: A new phase in U.S.—Brazil educational exchange. New York, NY: Institute of International Education.

32.

Morlang

Watson

(2007). Tertiary refugee education impact and achievements: 15 years of DAFI. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

33.

Mouton

(2010). The state of social science in Sub-Saharan Africa. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and International Social Science Council

34.

Němečková

Krylova

(2014). The Czech government scholarship programme for students from developing countries—Evaluation findings and policy reflections. Evaluation and Program Planning, 43, 83-92. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.002

35.

Perna

Orosz

Gopaul

Jumakulov

Ashirbekov

Kishkentayeva

(2014). Promoting human capital development: A typology of International Scholarship Programs in higher education. Educational Researcher, 43, 63-73. doi:10.3102/0013189X14521863

36.

Perna

Orosz

Jumakulov

(2015). Understanding the human capital benefits of a government-funded international scholarship program: An exploration of Kazakhstan’s Bolashak program. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 85-97. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.12.003

37.

Perraton

(2009). Learning abroad: A history of the Commonwealth Scholarship and Fellowship Plan. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.

38.

Pietsch

(2011). Many Rhodes: Travelling scholarships and imperial citizenship in the British academic world, 1880–1940. History of Education, 40, 723-739. doi:10.1080/0046760X.2011.594096

39.

Ramboll. (2012). Final report: Evaluation of NPT and NICHE. Berlin, Germany: Author.

40.

Robertson

S. L.

(2006). Brain drain, brain gain and brain circulation. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(1), 1-5. doi:10.1080/14767720600554908

41.

Rotem

Zinovieff

M. A.

Goubarev

(2010). A framework for evaluating the impact of the United Nations fellowship programmes. Human Resources for Health, 8(1), Article 7. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-8-7

42.

Senter for internasjonalisering av utdanning [SIU]. (2015). Graduate tracer study Norad’s programme for master studies (NOMA) and Norwegian programme for development, research and education (NUFU). Bergen, Norway: Author.

43.

Spielman

(2015). HMG scholarships cluster review. London, England: Her Majesty’s Government.

44.

Spilimbergo

(2009). Democracy and foreign education. American Economic Review, 99(1), 528-543. doi:10.1257/aer.99.1.528

45.

Stern

Stame

Mayne

Forss

Befani

(2012, January). Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations (Working paper 38). London, England: Department for international development.

46.

Strömbom

(1989). Evaluation of fellowships awarded to developing countries? What do the studies tell? Higher Education, 18, 707-724. doi:10.1007/BF00155662

47.

Sunal

D. W.

Sunal

C. C.

(1991). Professional and personal effects of the American fulbright experience in Africa. African Studies Review, 34, 97-123. doi:10.2307/524230

48.

Sykes

Chaoimh

(2012). Mobile talent? The Staying intentions of international students in five EU countries. Berlin, Germany: Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Integration und Migration GmbH.

49.

Taylor

Albasri

(2014). The impact of Saudi Arabia King Abdullah’s scholarship program in the U.S. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 109-118. doi:10.4236/jss.2014.210013

50.

Visser

Trinh

(2011). Country evaluation: Vietnam. Brussels, Belgium: Flemish Interuniversity Council Office for University Cooperation for Development [VLIR-UOS].

51.

Volkman

Dassin

Zurbuchen

(2009). Origins, journeys and returns: Social justice in international higher education. New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.

52.

Vos

de Zoete

(2015). NFP tracer study 2015. The Hague, The Netherlands: EP-Nuffic.

53.

Webb

(2009). Australian scholarships in Cambodia: Tracer study and evaluation. Canberra, Australia: AusAID.

54.

Wilson

(2015). Ends changed, means retained: Scholarship programs, political influence, and drifting goals. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 17, 130-151. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.12012

Approaches to Analyzing the Outcomes of International Scholarship Programs for Higher Education

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References