The determinants of study abroad student inflows and outflows are analyzed by comparing the faculties of all Czech public universities. The article develops an institutionalist theoretical perspective that views higher education institutions not only as passive senders and receivers of students but also as active gatekeepers that regulate student flows by balancing the inflows with outflows and vice versa. The theoretical argument is developed against the backdrop of existing theories that emphasize the “push–pull” factors as key determinants of student flows. The argument is tested by regression modeling using an original data set. Inflows are associated with past outflows and vice versa, whereas the importance of push–pull factors is surprisingly small. Important policy implications of these findings as well as implications for theory development are discussed.
BeerkensM.Souto-OteroM.de WitH.HuismanJ. (2016). Similar students and different countries? An analysis of the barriers and drivers for Erasmus participation in seven countries. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20, 184-204.
2.
BennettA.ElmanC. (2006). Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 455-476.
3.
BentoJ. P. C. (2014). The determinants of international academic tourism demand in Europe. Tourism Economics, 20, 611-628.
BinsardiA.EkwulugoF. (2003). International marketing of British education: Research on the students’ perception and the UK market penetration. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21, 318-327.
6.
BrandenburgU.TaboadelaO.BerghoffS. (2014). The Erasmus impact study. Effects of mobility on the skills and employability of students and the internationalisation of higher education institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
7.
CaoC.ZhuC.MengQ. (2016). A survey of the influencing factors for international academic mobility of Chinese university students. Higher Education Quarterly, 70, 200-220.
8.
Cebolla-BoadoH.HuY.SoysalY. N. (2018). Why study abroad? Sorting of Chinese students across British universities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39, 365-380.
EisenbergT.SundgrenS.WellsM. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35-54.
14.
FurukawaT.ShirakawaN.OkuwadaK. (2013). An empirical study of graduate student mobility underpinning research universities. Higher Education, 66, 17-37.
15.
GerhardsJ.HansS. (2013). Transnational human capital, education, and social inequality. Analyses of international student exchange. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 42, 99-117.
16.
GonzálezC. R.MesanzaR. B.MarielP. (2011). The determinants of international student mobility flows: An empirical study on the Erasmus programme. Higher Education, 62, 413-430.
17.
KarlsenJ.BesedaJ.ŠimaK.ZyzakB. (2017). Outsiders or leaders? The role of higher education institutions in the development of peripheral regions. Higher Education Policy, 30, 463-479.
18.
KimR. I.GoldsteinS. B. (2005). Intercultural attitudes predict favorable study abroad expectations of US college students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9, 265-278.
19.
KoubaK. (2018). Determinants of student participation in higher education governance: The case of student turnout in academic senate elections in Czechia. Higher Education, 76, 67-84.
20.
KritzM. M. (2016). Why do countries differ in their rates of outbound student mobility?Journal of Studies in International Education, 20, 99-117.
21.
LesjakM.JuvanE.InesonE. M.YapM. H.AxelssonE. P. (2015). Erasmus student motivation: Why and where to go?Higher Education, 70, 845-865.
22.
MazzarolT.SoutarG. N. (2002). “Push-pull” factors influencing international student destination choice. International Journal of Educational Management, 16, 82-90.
23.
McMahonM. E. (1992). Higher Education in a World Market. An Historical Look at the Global Context of International Study. Higher Education, 24, 465-482.
24.
MSMT (Ministerstvo školství mládeže a tělovýchovy). (2018). Přehled o přijímacím řízení Uchazeč 2016 [Overview of the Application Process 2016]. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports. Retrieved from https://dsia.msmt.cz/vysluch16.html
25.
NaidooV. (2007). Research on the flow of international students to UK universities: Determinants and implications. Journal of Research in International Education, 6, 287-307.
26.
NorthD. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 97-112.
27.
PetzoldK.PeterT. (2015). The social norm to study abroad: Determinants and effects. Higher Education, 69, 885-900.
28.
PimpaN. (2005). Marketing Australian universities to Thai students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9, 137-146.
RosenzweigM. R. (2006). Global wage differences and international student flows. In CollinsS. M.GrahamC. (Eds.), Brookings trade forum 2006: Global labor markets (pp. 57-86). Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
31.
SalisburyM. H.UmbachP. D.PaulsenM. B.PascarellaE. T. (2009). Going global: Understanding the choice process of the intent to study abroad. Research in Higher Education, 50, 119-143.
32.
ShepsleK. A. (1986). Institutional equilibrium and equilibrium institutions. In WeisbergH. F. (Ed.), Political science: The science of politics (pp. 51-81). New York, NY: Agathon.
33.
SoriaK. M.TroisiJ. (2014). Internationalization at home alternatives to study abroad: Implications for students’ development of global, international, and intercultural competencies. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18, 261-280.
34.
Souto-OteroM.HuismanJ.BeerkensM.de WitH.VujićS. (2013). Barriers to international student mobility: Evidence from the Erasmus program. Educational Researcher, 42, 70-77.
35.
StroudA. H. (2010). Who plans (not) to study abroad? An examination of US student intent. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14, 491-507.
Van BouwelL.VeugelersR. (2013). The determinants of student mobility in Europe: The quality dimension. European Journal of Higher Education, 3, 172-190.
39.
Van MolC.EkamperP. (2016). Destination cities of European exchange students. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 116, 85-91.
40.
Van MolC.TimmermanC. (2014). Should I stay or should I go? An analysis of the determinants of intra-European student mobility. Population, Space and Place, 20, 465-479.
41.
WeiH. (2013). An empirical study on the determinants of international student mobility: A global perspective. Higher Education, 66, 105-122.
42.
WilkinsS.BalakrishnanM. S.HuismanJ. (2012). Student choice in higher education: Motivations for choosing to study at an international branch campus. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16, 413-433.
43.
WilkinsS.HuismanJ. (2011). Student recruitment at international branch campuses: Can they compete in the global market?Journal of Studies in International Education, 15, 299-316.
