Increasingly, international competence is considered an important skill to be acquired from an undergraduate education. Because international exchange presents a challenge to many students, there is a need to develop and implement alternative means for incorporating international and cross-cultural experiences into the undergraduate classroom. We report on the implementation of a semester-long, virtually shared course offering between a U.S. and a Bolivian university. As STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) majors tend to be under-represented in study-abroad programs, this class sought to provide a multidisciplinary experience that could be relevant to both hard and social science majors. Furthermore, the relevance and learning impact of this class was enhanced through the incorporation of a service-learning component in conjunction with a rural Bolivian partner organization. The results of this experience show that virtually shared classroom experiences can successfully facilitate international experiences for undergraduate students.
AllenD.DuchB. (1996). The power of problem-based learning in teaching introductory science courses. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 43-52.
3.
ArunachalamS. (2002). Reaching the unreached: How can we use information and communication technologies to empower the rural poor in the developing world through enhanced access to relevant information?Journal of Information Science, 28, 513-522. doi:10.1177/016555150202800607
4.
AstinA. W.VogelgesangL. J.IkedaE. K.YeeJ. A. (2000). How service learning affects students: Higher education. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles.
5.
BarrowsH. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996, 3-12.
6.
BielefeldtA. R.PearceJ. M. (2012). Service learning in engineering. In ColledgeT. H. (Ed.), Convergence: Philosophies and pedagogies for developing the next generation of humanitarian engineers and social entrepreneurs (pp. 24-52). State College, PA: International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering.
CarrollT. (1992). Intermediary NGOs: The supporting link in grassroots development. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
9.
ChanA.FishbeinJ. (2009). A global engineer for the global community. The Journal of Policy Engagement, 1(2), 4-9.
10.
ClarkeI.FlahertyT. B.WrightN. D.McMillenR. M. (2009). Student intercultural proficiency from study abroad programs. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 173-181. doi:10.1177/0273475309335583
11.
CogburnD. L.LevinsonN. S. (2008). Teaching globalization, globally: A seven-year case study of South Africa – U.S. virtual teams. Information Technologies and International Development, 4(3), 75-88.
12.
CogburnD. L.LevinsonN. S.Ramnarine-RieksA. U.VasquezF. K. E. (2010). A decade of globally distributed collaborative learning: Lessons learned from cross-national virtual teams. Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (IEEE Computer Society Press, 11 pp.).
13.
DanielsM.CajanderA.PearsA. (2010). Engineering education research in practice: Evolving use of open ended group projects as a pedagogical strategy for developing skills in global collaboration. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 1-12.
14.
DeardorffD. K. (2004, Spring). Internationalization: In search of intercultural competence. International Educator, 13-15.
15.
DeardorffD. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, 241-266. doi:10.1177/1028315306287002
16.
DoerryE.KlempousR.NikodemJ.PaetzoldW. (2004). Virtual student exchange: Lessons learned in virtual international teaming in interdisciplinary design education. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education (pp. 650-655). IEEE. doi: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1358252&isnumber=29802.
17.
ErdenA.ErkmenA. M.ErkmenI.BucinellR. B.TraverC.MemberA.NotashL. (2000). The Multidisciplinary International Virtual Design Studio (MiVDS). IEEE Transactions on Education, 43, 288-295.
18.
EylerJ.GilesD. E.BraxtonJ. (1997). The impact of service-learning on college students. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 5-15.
19.
FreedB. F.SegalowitzN.DeweyD. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275-301. doi:10.1017/S0272263104262064
20.
FreemanR. B. (2010). Globalization of scientific and engineering talent: International mobility of students, workers, and ideas and the world economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19, 396-406.
21.
HuC. (2010). When cultures meet in blended learning: What literature tells us. In NgE. M. W. (Eds.), Comparative blended learning practices and environments (pp. 278-300). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-852-9.ch014
22.
HunterW. (2004, Spring). Got global competency?International Educator, 6-12.
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica (National Institute of Statistics). (2011). Encuesta de Hogares 2011. La Paz, Bolivia, Retrieved from http://www.ine.gob.bo/pdf/EH/EH_2011.pdf.
26.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.SmithK. A. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
27.
KingingerC. (2008). Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. The Modern Language Journal, 92(Suppl. 1), 1-124.
28.
LawaleS.Bory-AdamsA. (2010). The decade of education for sustainable development: Towards four pillars of learning. Development, 53, 547-550. doi:10.1057/dev.2010.76
29.
LehmannM.ChristensenP.DuX.ThraneM. (2008). Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 283-295. doi:10.1080/03043790802088566
30.
LopattoD. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3, 270-277. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045
31.
LopattoD. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6, 297-306. doi:10.1187/cbe.07
32.
MihelcicJ. R.PatersonK. G.PhillipsL. D.ZhangQ.WatkinsD. W.BarkdollB. D.HokansonD. R. (2008). Educating engineers in the sustainable futures model with a global perspective. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 25, 255-263. doi:10.1080/10286600802002981
33.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2013). D-lab MIT. Available from http://d-lab.mit.edu/
34.
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2010). Science and Engineering Indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Board.
35.
National Research Council. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering.
36.
NieusmaD.RileyD. (2010). Designs on development: Engineering, globalization, and social justice. Engineering Studies, 2, 29-59. doi:10.1080/19378621003604748
OslerA.VincentK. (2002). Citizenship and the challenge of global education. Sterling, VA: Trentham Books.
39.
ParkinsonA. (2007). Engineering study abroad programs: Formats, challenges, best practices. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 2(2), http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol2/iss2/2.
40.
PattonM. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Wiley, DOI: 10.1002/0470013192.bsa514.
41.
PearceJ. M. (2006). Service learning in engineering and science for sustainable development. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, 1, 1-4.
42.
PolakP. (2008). Out of poverty: What works when traditional approaches fail. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
43.
RussellS.HancockM. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316, 548-549.
44.
RutkowskiA.-F.VogelD.van GenuchtenM.SaundersC. (2008). Communication in virtual teams: Ten years of experience in education. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51, 302-312. doi:10.1109/TPC.2008.2001252
45.
SadlerT. D.BurginS.McKinneyL.PonjuanL. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 235-256. doi:10.1002/tea.20326
46.
SalisburyM. H.UmbachP. D.PaulsenM. B.PascarellaE. T. (2008). Going global: Understanding the choice process of the intent to study abroad. Research in Higher Education, 50, 119-143. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9111-x
47.
SaxL.AstinA. W. (1997). The benefits of service: Evidence from undergraduates. Educational Record, 78(3-4), 25-32.
48.
StroudA. H. (2010). Who plans (not) to study abroad? An examination of U.S. student intent. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14, 491-507. doi:10.1177/1028315309357942
49.
ThiryH.HunterA. B.LaursenS. L. (2011). What experiences help students become scientists?: A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 82, 357-388.
WilliamsT. R. (2005). Exploring the impact of study abroad on students’ intercultural communication skills: Adaptability and sensitivity. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9, 356-371. doi:10.1177/1028315305277681
