The Minimum Clinically Significant Difference in Acute Nontraumatic Thoracoabdominal Pain in Adult Emergency Department Patients in Turkey

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the minimum clinically significant difference (MCSD) in visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores for acute non-traumatic thoracoabdominal pain (TAP) in the emergency department (ED) and to determine its association with sociodemographic features, location and duration of pain.

Methods

An observational survey of adult ED patients with TAP lasting less than 48 hours was conducted over a six-week period. Demographic information and the duration and location of pain were recorded. Patients indicated their pain level on a 100-mm VAS at baseline and at 20, 40, and 60 minutes thereafter. Subjects were also asked to rate their pain as ‘much less’, ‘a little less’, ‘about the same’, ‘a little more’, or ‘much more’ at the 20-, 40-, and 60-minute time points. MCSD was calculated as the difference between the subsequent and preceding VAS scores if a patient reported pain as ‘a little less’ or ‘a little more’.

Results

Data was available for 306 of the 374 patients with TAP who presented during the study period. For pain comparisons (n=428) categorised as ‘a little less’ or ‘a little more’, the MCSD was 24.2 mm (95% CI 22.6-25.7 mm). The MCSD value was not significantly different among the factors of gender, age, level of education, duration, or location of pain.

Conclusions

The MCSD of ED patients with nontraumatic thoracoabominal pain in Turkey is 24.2 mm. The MCSD is not affected by gender, age, level of education, location, or duration of pain.

Keywords

Hospital emergency service pain measurement reliablity of results reproducibility of results visual analog pain scale

References

S.F.

, Greenwald

P.W.

, Gennis

, Bijur

P.E.

, Gallagher

E.J.

Effect of age on acute pain perception of a standardized stimulus in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38(6): 644–7.

Zborowski

Cultural components in response to pain. J Soc Issues 1952; 8(4): 16–32.

Edwards

R.R.

, Doleys

D.M.

, Fillingim

R.B.

, Lowery

Ethnic differences in pain tolerance: clinical implications in a chronic pain population. Psychosom Med 2001; 63(2): 316–23.

Bird

S.B.

, Dickson

E.W.

Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38(6): 639–43.

Guru

, Dubinsky

The patient vs. caregiver perception of acute pain in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2000; 18(1): 7–12.

Wilson

J.E.

, Pendleton

J.M.

Oligoanalgesia in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 1989; 7(6): 620–3.

Wong

M.T.

, Ip

, Graham

C.A.

Pain and pain management in a Hong Kong emeregncy department. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2011; 18(6): 406–11.

Powell

C.V.

, Kelly

A.M.

, Williams

Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37(1): 28–31.

Kelly

A.M.

The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J 2001; 18(3): 205–7.

10.

Todd

K.H.

, Funk

K.G.

, Funk

J.P.

, Bonacci

Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27(4): 485–9.

11.

Gallagher

E.J.

, Liebman

, Bijur

P.E.

Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38(6): 633–8.

12.

Huskisson

E.C.

Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2(7889): 1127–31.

13.

Todd

K.H.

Clinical versus statistical significance in the assessment of pain relief. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27(4): 439–41.

14.

Philip

B.K.

Parametric statistics for evaluation of the visual analog scale. Anesth Analg 1990; 71(6): 710.

15.

Dexter

, Chestnut

D.H.

Analysis of the statistical tests to compare visual analog scale measurements among groups. Anesthesiology 1995; 82(4): 896–902.

16.

Kelly

A.M.

Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain score differ with gender, age or cause of pain?

Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5(11): 1086–90.

17.

Gallagher

E.J.

, Bijur

P.E.

, Latimer

, Silver

Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal; l pain in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20(4): 287–90.

18.

Mark

M.S.M.

, Au

T.T.S.

, Choi

Y.F.

, Wong

T.W.

The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score in a local emergency setting. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2009; 16(4): 233–6.