Sustainability reporting has seen increased adoption as more businesses are recognizing wider societal and environmental obligations outside of traditional shareholder commitments. Several jurisdictions such as Malaysia and Hong Kong have passed regulations to encourage or mandate sustainability reporting. Likewise, Singapore has instituted mandatory sustainability reporting for all listed companies since 2016. The development of sustainability reporting in Singapore is explored using material from government agencies, company sustainability reports, conference speeches and newspaper articles. Viewing sustainability reporting as a socio-material assemblage of heterogeneous actors, discursive practices and other policy artefacts, local corporate sustainability initiatives are framed heavily in business logics such as the ‘triple bottom line’, while being anchored to broader national sustainability campaigns and commitments under international agreements. Such an economistic framing may limit the effectiveness of efforts to drive genuine changes in corporate sustainability, as companies may merely engage in a ‘checkbox ticking’ exercise to fulfil regulatory obligations. This paper highlights the multisited nature of policymaking and the tensions that may arise in a top-down approach to implementation.
BakerTMcGuirkP (2017) Assemblage thinking as methodology: Commitments and practices for critical policy research. Territory, Politics, Governance5(4): 425–442.
3.
BrennerNMaddenDJWachsmuthD (2011) Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City15(2): 225–240.
4.
BurrittRL, andSchalteggerS (2010) Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 23(7): 829–846.
5.
ChoCHLaineMRobertsRW, et al. (2015) Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society40: 78–94.
6.
CorsonCCampbellLMWilshusenP, et al. (2019) Assembling global conservation governance. Geoforum103: 56–65.
7.
DeathC (2011) Summit theatre: exemplary governmentality and environmental diplomacy in Johannesburg and Copenhagen. Environmental Politics20(1): 1–19.
8.
DeLandaM (2006) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. New York: Continuum.
9.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147.
11.
DonaldsonTPrestonLE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review20(1): 65.
12.
Du GayPPrykeM (2002) Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life. London: SAGE.
FoucaultM (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
16.
GalaniDGravasEStavropoulosA (2012) Company characteristics and environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment21(4): 236–247.
17.
GalloPJChristensenLJ (2011) Firm size matters: An empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Business & Society50(2): 315–349.
18.
GrayRKouhyRLaversS (1995) Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal8(2): 47–77.
19.
HaleJLegunKCampbellH, et al. (2019) Social sustainability indicators as performance. Geoforum103: 47–55.
20.
HessM (2004) ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embedded ness. Progress in Human Geography28(2): 165–186.
21.
HigginsCLarrinagaC (2014) Sustainability reporting: Insights from institutional theory. In: BebbingtonJUnermanJO’DwyerB (eds) Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. London: Routledge, pp. 291–303.
22.
HissS (2013) The politics of the financialization of sustainability. Competition & Change17(3): 234–247.
23.
KaplanRKindermanD (2020) The business-led globalization of CSR: Channels of diffusion from the United States into Venezuela and Britain, 1962-1981. Business & Society59(3): 439–488.
24.
KohJKCLeongV (2017) The rise of the sustainability reporting megatrend: A corporate governance perspective. Business Law International18(233).
LatourB (2007) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
LiTM (2007) Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society36(2): 263–293.
28.
LiuFHMDemerittDTangS (2019) Accounting for sustainability in Asia: Stock market regulation and reporting in Hong Kong and Singapore. Economic Geography95(4): 362–384.
LohLThomasTWangY (2017) Sustainability reporting and firm value: Evidence from Singapore-listed companies. Sustainability9(11): 2112.
31.
MacDonaldKI (2010) Business, biodiversity and new ‘Fields’ of conservation: The world conservation congress and the renegotiation of organisational order. Conservation and Society8(4): 256.
32.
MarshallJDToffelMW (2005) Framing the elusive concept of sustainability: A sustainability hierarchy. Environmental Science & Technology39(3): 673–682.
33.
McCannE (2011) Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers101(1): 107–130.
MilneMGrayR (2013) W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics118(1): 13–29.
36.
Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources and Ministry of National Development (2014) Our Home, Our Environment, Our Future: Sustainable Singapore Blueprint 2015. Singapore: Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources: Ministry of National Development. Available at: www.nccs.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/sustainable-singapore-blueprint-2015.pdf (accessed 23 December 2020).
37.
MüllerM (2015) Assemblages and actor‐networks: Rethinking socio‐material power,politics and space. Geography Compass9(1): 27–41.
38.
NewellPPatersonM (2010) Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
OrmondJ (2015) New regimes of responsibilization: Practicing product carbon footprinting in the new carbon economy. Economic Geography91(4): 425–448.
40.
PaçoAMFdo RaposoMLB (2010) Green consumer market segmentation: Empirical findings from Portugal. International Journal of Consumer Studies34(4): 429–436.
PowCP (2014) License to travel. City 18(3): 287–306.
43.
PowerM (2003) Evaluating the audit explosion. Law & Policy25(3): 185–202.
44.
PrinceR (2010) Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space42(1): 169–186.
45.
RusinkoCA (2010) Integrating sustainability in management and business education: A matrix approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education 9(3): 507–519.
46.
SavageGC (2019) What is policy assemblage?Territory, Politics, Governance. DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760.
47.
ShnayderLRijnsoeverFJvan HekkertMP (2015) Putting your money where your mouth is: Why sustainability reporting based on the triple bottom line can be misleading. PloS One10(3): e0119036.
48.
SridharKJonesG (2013) The three fundamental criticisms of the Triple Bottom Line approach: An empirical study to link sustainability reports in companies based in the Asia-Pacific region and TBL shortcomings. Asian Journal of Business Ethics2(1): 91–111.
49.
StolowyHPaugamL (2018) The expansion of non-financial reporting: An exploratory study. Accounting and Business Research48(5): 525–548.
50.
TangSDemerittD (2018) Climate change and mandatory carbon reporting: Impacts on business process and performance. Business Strategy and the Environment27(4): 437–455.
51.
ThriftN (1997) The rise of soft capitalism. Cultural Values1(1): 29–57.
52.
United Nations (2020) Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed 21 December 2020).
53.
WilshusenPRMacDonaldKI (2017) Fields of green: Corporate sustainability and the production of economistic environmental governance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49(8): 1824–1845.
