The quantum moment in International Relations theory challenges the taken for granted Newtonian assumptions of conventional theories, while offering a novel physical imaginary grounded in quantum mechanics. As part of the special issue on reconceptualizing markets, this article questions if prior efforts to conceptualize ‘the market’ have been unsuccessful at capturing the paradoxical microfoundational/macrostructural because of the Newtonian worldview within which much social science operates. By developing a new, quantum perspective on the market, taking the physical paradigm of the wavefunction, I seek to explore the connections between entanglement, nonlocality, interference and invisible social structures. To demonstrate the applicability of quantum thinking, I explore how global value chains and open economy politics might be ‘quantized’, through the mobilization of core concepts of quantum social theory, within the broad framework of the market as a quantum social wavefunction.
AlbertMBathonF (2020)
Quantum and systems theory in world society: Not brothers and sisters but relatives still?Security Dialogue 51(5): 434–449.
2.
ArfiB (2005)
Resolving the trust predicament: A quantum game-theoretic approach. Theory and Decision59: 127–174.
3.
Albert DZ (1992) Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
5.
BengtssonIZyczkowskiK (2017) Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement. 2nd ed.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.
6.
BohrN (1935)
Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?Physical Review48: 696–702.
7.
CallonM (1998) Introduction to the Laws of the Market.
Malden, MA:
Blackwell Publishers.
8.
Chesse A (forthcoming) The worth of nations: the symbolic construction of market economies. Competition & Change.
9.
DaviesPCWBrownJR (1993) Introduction to the Ghost in the Atom: A Discussion of the Mysteries of Quantum Physics.
New York:
Columbia University Press.
10.
De MarchiVDi MariaEPonteS (2013)
The greening of global value chains: Insights from the furniture industry. Competition & Change14(4): 299–318.
11.
Der DerianJ (2019)
A quantum of insecurity. New Perspectives27(2): 13–27.
12.
Der DerianJWendtA (2020) ‘
Quantizing international relations’: The case for quantum approaches to international theory and security practice. Security Dialogue 51(5): 399–413.
13.
DumezHJeunemaitreA (1998) The unlikely encounter between economics and a market: The case of the cement industry. In: CallonM (ed.) The Laws of the Market.
Malden, MA:
Blackwell Publishers, pp.222–243.
14.
Eagleton-Pierce M (forthcoming) Markets: the genealogy of a concept. Competition & Change.
15.
EinsteinA (1967) On a heuristic point of view about the creation and conversion of light. In: Ter HaarD (ed.) The Old Quantum Theory.
New York:
Pergamon Press, pp.91–107.
16.
EinsteinAPodolskyBRosenN (1935)
Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?Physical Review47: 777–780.
17.
FeynmanR (2006) QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
18.
FierkeKMMackayN (2020)
To ‘see’ is to break an entanglement: Quantum measurement, trauma, and security. Security Dialogue 51(5): 450–466.
19.
FligsteinNCalderR (2015) The architecture of markets. In: ScottRKosslynS (eds) Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioural Sciences.
Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons, pp.1–14.
20.
FuwaMTakedaSZwierzM, et al. (2015)
Experimental proof of nonlocal wavefunction collapse for a single particle using homodyne measurements. Nature Communications6(6665):1–6.
21.
GereffiG (1996)
Global commodity chains: New forms of coordination and control among nations and firms in international industries. Competition & Change4: 427–439.
22.
Gereffi G, Humphrey J, and Sturgeon T (2005) The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 12(1): 78–104.
23.
GereffiGLeeJ (2012)
Why the world suddenly cares about global supply chains. Journal of Supply Chain Management48(3): 24–32.
24.
GroveJV (2020)
Bringing the world back in: Revolutions and relations before and after the quantum event. Security Dialogue 51(5): 414–433.
25.
HanauskeMKunzJBerniusS, et al. (2010)
Doves and hawks in economics revisited: An evolutionary quantum game theory based analysis of financial crises. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications389: 5084–5102.
26.
HavenEKhrennikovA (2013) Quantum Social Science.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.
27.
HavenEKhrennikovA (2017) The Palgrave Handbook of Quantum Models in Social Science: Applications and Grand Challenges.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
HeisenbergW (1983) The physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics. In: WheelerJAZurekWH (eds) Quantum Theory and Measurement.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press, pp.62–86.
29.
HoneggerRRieckersA (2015) Photons in Fock Space and Beyond: Quantized Mesoscopic Radiation Models.
Volume II.
Hackensack, NJ:
World Scientific Publishing.
30.
KatzensteinPJNelsonSC (2013)
Reading the right signals and reading the signals right: IPE and the financial crisis of 2008. Review of International Political Economy20(5): 1101–1131.
KumarA (2019)
A race from the bottom? Lessons from a workers’ struggle at a Bangalore warehouse. Competition & Change23(4): 346–377.
33.
KyddA (2000)
Trust, reassurance, and cooperation. International Organization54: 325–357.
34.
LakeDA (2009a)
Open economy politics: A critical review. The Review of International Organizations4: 219–244.
35.
LakeDA (2009b)
TRIPs across the Atlantic: Theory and epistemology in IPE. Review of International Political Economy16(1): 47–57.
36.
Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
37.
LatourB (2003)
Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry30(2): 225–248.
38.
Latour B and Woolgar S (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39.
LeedsBA (2003)
Alliance reliability in times of war: Explaining state decisions to violate treaties. International Organization57: 801–827.
40.
LittleD (2018)
Entangling the social: Comments on Alexander Wendt. Quantum Mind and Social Science,Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour48: 167–176.
41.
MajoranaE (2006) The value of statistical laws in physics and social sciences. In: Bassani GF (ed.) Ettore Majorana: Scientific Papers. Bologna: Societa Italiana di Fisica and Springer Nature, pp.250–258.
42.
MalinS (2012) Nature Loves to Hide: Quantum Physics and the Nature of Reality, a Western Perspective (Revised Edition).
Hackensack, NJ:
World Scientific Publishing.
43.
Massot P (2020) The state of the study of the market in political economy: China’s rise shines light on conceptual shortcomings. Competition & Change. Epub ahead of print 22 November 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1024529420965523.
44.
MurphyMPA (2021) Quantum Social Theory for Critical International Relations Theorists: Quantizing Critique.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
MyrdalG (1957) Economic Theory and under-Developed Regions.
London:
Duckworth.
46.
OatleyT (2011)
The reductionist gamble: Open economy politics in the global economy. International Organization65(2): 311–341.
47.
OatleyT (2017)
Open economy politics and trade policy. Review of International Political Economy24 (4): 699–717.
48.
OrlandoL (2020)
The fabric of agency: Navigating human potentialities through introspection. Security Dialogue 51(5): 467–481.
49.
OrrellD (2016)
A quantum theory of money and value. Economic Thought5(2): 19–28.
50.
OrrellD (2018) Quantum Economics: The New Science of Money.
London:
Icon.
51.
OrrellD (2020)
The value of value: A quantum approach to economics, security, and international relations. Security Dialogue 51(5): 482–498.
52.
OwenEWalterS (2017)
Open economy politics and Brexit: Insights, puzzles, and ways forward. Review of International Political Economy24(2): 179–202.
53.
PiotrowskiEWSladkowskiJ (2002)
Quantum market games. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications312(1/2): 208–216.
54.
PiotrowskiEWSladkowskiJ (2003)
Trading by quantum rules: Quantum anthropic principle. International Journal of Theoretical Physics42: 1101–1106.
55.
PiotrowskiEWSladkowskiJ (2005)
Quantum diffusion of prices and profits. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications345(1/2): 185–195.
56.
PolkinghorneJC (1985) The Quantum World.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
57.
PolkinghorneJC (2007) Quantum Physics and Theology: An Unexpected Kinship.
New Haven:
Yale University Press.
58.
SarkissianJ (2020)
Quantum coupled-wave theory of price formation in financial markets: Price measurement, dynamics, and ergodicity. Physica A. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124300.
59.
SchrodingerE (1935)
Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society31(4): 555–563.
60.
SchrodingerE (1936)
Probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society32(3): 446–452.
61.
SchrodingerE (1980)
The present situation in quantum mechanics. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society124(5): 323–338.
62.
WalterA (2016)
Open economy politics and international security dynamics: Explaining international cooperation in financial crises. European Journal of International Relations22(2): 289–312.
63.
Waldner D (2017) Schrodinger's cat and the dog that didn’t bark: why quantum mechanics is (probably) irrelevant to the social sciences. Critical Review 29(2): 199–233.
64.
WendtAE (2015) Quantum Mind and Social Science.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.
65.
WinchP (1990) The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. 2nd ed.
London:
Routledge.
66.
YinJCao Y, Li YH, et al. (2017)
Satellite-based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometres. Science (New York, N.Y.)356(6343): 1140–1144.
67.
ZanottiL (2019) Ontological Entanglements, Agency, and Ethics in International Relations: Exploring the Crossroads.
London:
Routledge.
68.
ZanottiL (2020)
De-colonizing the political ontology of Kantian ethics: A quantum perspective. Journal of International Political Theory. Epub ahead of print 18 August 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1755088220946777.
69.
ZoharD (1990) The Quantum Self: Human Nature and Consciousness Defined by the New Physics.
New York:
Quill & William Morrow.
70.
ZoharDMarshallI (1994) The Quantum Society: Mind, Physics, and a New Social Vision.
New York:
William Morrow & Co.
