Although active markets for corporate control have proliferated beyond liberal market economies, marketization has not become universal and indeed takes different forms. Although there is a growing body of literature that analyses marketization, systemic underlying dynamics shaping the specific trajectory of marketization have been scarcely addressed. Drawing on a critical institutionalist perspective, this article analyzes the marketization of corporate control against the backdrop of the structural problem of overaccumulation and locates the variegated trajectory of marketization in the specific interplay between the state and different capital fractions. This article focuses on Serbia and Turkey. Serbia has witnessed a substantial marketization of corporate control which comprises the adoption of (foreign) investor friendly market-enabling regulations and a growing number of majority acquisitions which were often followed by efficiency-oriented restructurings. By contrast, in Turkey, state capital alliances hampered the marketization of corporate control, and advocated for regulations which still allow for the selective prioritization of certain capital fractions.
AraratM (2011) ‘Comply or Explain’ without consequences: The case of Turkey. In: MallinCA (ed.) Handbook on International Corporate Governance: Country Analyses.
Cheltenham / Northampton:
Edward Elgar, pp. 355–370.
2.
ArmourJJacobsJBMilhauptCJ (2011)
The evolution of hostile takeover regimes in developed and emerging markets: An analytical framework. Harvard International Law Journal52(1): 219–285.
3.
Aydin-DüzgitSTocciN (2015) Turkey and the European Union.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BabacanE (2014) Die finanzialisierte Akkumulationsstrategie der Türkei und ihre Risiken. In: NölkeAMayCClaarS (eds) Die Großen Schwellenländer: Ursachen und Folgen ihres Aufstiegs in der Weltwirtschaft.
Wiesbaden:
Springer VS, pp. 227–245.
5.
BanC (2013)
From cocktail to dependence: Revisiting the foundations of dependent market economies. Research from the Global Economic Governance Initiative (3): 1–31.
6.
BohleD (2016) East Central Europe in the European Union. In: CafrunyATalaniLSPozo MartinG (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical International Political Economy.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 369–389.
7.
BruffIEbenauM (2014)
Critical political economy and the critique of comparative capitalisms scholarship on capitalist diversity. Capital & Class38(1): 3–15.
8.
Buch-HansenH (2012)
The political economy of regulatory change: The case of British merger control. Regulation & Governance6(1): 101–118.
9.
Buch-HansenHWiggerA (2011) The Politics of European Competition Regulation: A Critical Political Economy Perspective.
London:
Routledge.
CallaghanH (2015a)
Something left to lose?: Network preservation as a motive for protectionist responses to foreign takeovers. Review of International Political Economy22(2): 391–418.
13.
CallaghanH (2015b)
Who cares about financialization?: Self-reinforcing feedback, issue salience, and increasing acquiescence to market-enabling takeover rules. Socio-Economic Review13(2): 331–350.
14.
CATUS (2015a) Confederation of autonomous trade unions in Serbia problematic privatisation models. Available at: http://sindikat.rs/ENG/index.html (accessed 3 April 2017).
15.
CATUS (2015b) Confederation of autonomous trade unions in Serbia unions against privatisation of ‘Telekom’. Available at: http://sindikat.rs/ENG/index.html (accessed 3 April 2017).
16.
CoatesD (2015) Varieties of capitalism and ‘the great moderation’. In: EbenauMBruffIMayC (eds) New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 11–27.
17.
CulpepperPD (2011) Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
18.
DarcillonT (2015)
How does finance affect labor market institutions?: An empirical analysis in 16 OECD countries. Socio-Economic Review13(3): 477–504.
19.
DrahokoupilJMyantM (2015) Putting comparative capitalisms research in its place: Varieties of capitalism in transition economies. In: EbenauMBruffIMayC (eds) New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 155–171.
20.
EbenauM (2012)
Varieties of capitalism or dependency?: A critique of the VoC approach for Latin America. Competition & Change16(3): 206–223.
EstrinSUvalicM (2016)
Foreign direct investment in the Western Balkans: What role has it played during transition?Comparative Economic Studies58(3): 455–483.
FarkasB (2011)
The Central and Eastern European model of capitalism. Post-Communist Economies23(1): 15–34.
31.
FarkasB (2016) Models of Capitalism in the European Union: Post-Crisis Perspectives.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
FeldmannM (2017)
Crisis and opportunity: Varieties of capitalism and varieties of crisis responses in Estonia and Slovenia. European Journal of Industrial Relations23(1): 33–46.
33.
Foreign Investment Council (FIC) (2010) White Book. Proposals for Improvement of the Business Environment in Serbia. Belgrade.
34.
Foreign Investment Council (FIC) (2011) White Book. Proposals for Improvement of the Business Environment in Serbia. Belgrade.
Foreign Investment Council (FIC) (2015b) White Book. Proposals for Improvement of the Business Environment in Serbia. Belgrade.
37.
Foreign Investor Council (2006) Foreign Investors Council Proposals for Improvementof the Investment Climate in Serbia.
Belgrade:
FIC.
38.
GospelHPendletonAVitolsS (2014) Financialization, New Investment Funds, and Labour: An International Comparison.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
39.
HallPASoskiceDW (2001) An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: HallPASoskiceDW (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 1–70.
40.
HarveyD (2007) The Limits to Capital.
London:
Verso.
JessopB (1990) State Theory. Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
46.
JessopB (2002) Capitalism, the regulation approach, and critical realism. In: BrownAFleetwoodSRobertsJM (eds) Critical Realism and Marxism.
London / New York, NY:
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 88–116.
47.
KelleherE (2012) Turkey moves first on e-voting. Financial Times, 7 October.
MarkusSMendelskiM (2015)
Institutional complementarity, economic performance and governance in the post-communist world. Comparative European Politics13(3): 376–404.
50.
MassoudiAFontanella-KhanJ (2016) M&A boom set to continue in 2017. Financial Times, 29 December.
51.
MayCNölkeA (2013) Kritischer Institutionalismus in der Vergleichenden Kapitalismusforschung: Konzeptuelle Überlegungen und Forschungsprogramm. In: BruffIEbenauMMayCet al. (eds) Vergleichende Kapitalismusforschung: Stand, Perspektiven, Kritik.
Münster:
Westfälisches Dampfboot, pp. 103–118.
52.
MayCNölkeA (2015) Critical institutionalism in studies of comparative capitalisms: Conceptual considerations and research programme. In: EbenauMBruffIMayC (eds) New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 83–100.
MorganG (2016)
New actors and old solidarities: Institutional change and inequality under a neo-liberal international order. Socio-Economic Review14(1): 201–225.
56.
MuellerDC (2012) Mergers and the market for corporate control. In: MuellerDC (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Capitalism.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press, pp. 426–460.
57.
NilssonGO (2010) The draft Turkish commercial code and corporate governance. In: GrundmannSHaarBMerktHet al. (eds) Festschrift für Klaus J. Hopt zum 70. Geburtstag am 24. August 2010.
Berlin / New York, NY:
De Gruyter, pp. 3177–3198.
58.
NilssonGO (2017) Corporate governance in Turkey. In: NgwuFNOsujiOStephenFH (eds) Corporate Governance in Developing and Emerging Markets.
London:
Routledge, pp. 183–196.
59.
NölkeA (2016)
Economic causes of the Eurozone Crisis: The analytical contribution of comparative capitalism. Socio-Economic Review14(1): 141–161.
60.
NölkeAVliegenthartA (2009)
Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics61(4): 670–702.
61.
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.
Paris:
OECD.
62.
OECD (2015) G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.
Paris:
OECD.
63.
OrensteinMA (2014) Reassessing the neo-liberal development model in Central and Eastern Europe. In: SchmidtVAThatcherM (eds) Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 374–402.
64.
OverbeekH (2012)
Sovereign debt crisis in Euroland: Root causes and implications for European integration. The International Spectator47(1): 30–48.
65.
ÖzelI (2015) State-Business Alliances and Economic Development: Turkey, Mexico and North Africa.
London / New York, NY:
Routledge.
66.
PendletonA (2016) The employment effects of takeovers. In: CremersJVitolsS (eds) Takeovers with or without Workers Voice: Workers’ Rights under the EU Takeover Bids Directive.
Brussels:
ETUI, pp. 71–85.
67.
PoliE (2016) Antitrust Institutions and Policies in the Globalising Economy.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan.
68.
SabićDVujadinovićSMilinčićM (2012)
The impact of FDI on the transitional economy in Serbia. Changes and challenges. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica9(3): 65–84.
UvalicM (2010) Serbia’s Transition: Towards a Better Future.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan.
76.
van ApeldoornBHornL (2007)
The marketisation of European corporate control: A critical political economy perspective. New Political Economy12(2): 211–235.
77.
van der ZwanN (2014)
Making sense of financialization. Socio-Economic Review12(1): 99–129.
VliegenthartAHornL (2007)
The role of the EU in the (trans)formation of corporate governance regulation in Central Eastern Europe: The case of the Czech Republic. Competition & Change11(2): 137–154.
80.
VliegenthartAOverbeekH (2010) Corporate governance regulation in East Central Europe. In: OverbeekHvan ApeldoornBNölkeA (eds) The Transnational Politics of Corporate Governance Regulation.
London:
Routledge, pp. 177–197.
81.
WiggerA (2012)
The political interface of financialisation and the regulation of mergers and acquisitions in the EU. Journal of European Integration34(6): 623–641.
82.
WiggerANölkeA (2007)
Enhanced roles of private actors in EU business regulation and the erosion of Rhenish Capitalism: The case of antitrust enforcement. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies45(2): 487–513.
YOIKK (2016) The coordination council for the improvement of the investment environment. Available at: http://www.yoikk.gov.tr/detay.cfm?MID=266 (accessed 22 May 2017).
