Much of the recent literature on the COVID-19 pandemic agrees on the uniqueness of this crisis. Assessments of the subsequent policy response in Europe diverge, however: while some see signs of policy change, others consider the empirical evidence to be inconclusive or, worse, consistent with a reinforcement of neoliberalism. The present article aims to contribute to that debate by providing a preliminary assessment of policy measures in the areas of health care, employment protection and pensions. Recent measures are viewed in terms of the neoliberal paradigm, which is used as a benchmark to identify any sign of innovation. While it is too early to talk about a true paradigmatic transformation, the evidence collected from international datasets and official documents confirms that ideas and policy measures show signs of change. The article also suggests that the study of ideas is a promising field of enquiry with which to improve our understanding of the pandemic and its effects.
AcemogluDRobinsonJ (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York, NY: Crown.
2.
AndorL (2020) SURE – EU capacity for stabilising employment and incomes in the pandemic. Intereconomics55(3): 139–142.
3.
BanC (2016) Ruling Ideas: How Global Neoliberalism Goes Local. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BanCBohleDNaczykM (2022) A perfect storm: COVID-19 and the reorganisation of the German meat industry. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research28(1) : 101–118.
5.
BaptistaIMarlierESpasovaS, et al. (2021) Social Protection and Inclusion Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Crisis. An Analysis of Policies in 35 Countries. European Social Policy Network (ESPN). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
6.
BlythM (2013) The austerity delusion: Why a bad idea won over the West. Foreign Affairs92(3): 41–56.
7.
BorioC (2020) The Covid-19 economic crisis: Dangerously unique. Business Economics55: 181–190.
8.
ButiMPapaconstantinouG (2021) The legacy of the pandemic: How Covid-19 is reshaping economic policy in the EU. CEPR Policy Insight109: 1–15.
9.
CapanoGHowlettMJarvisDSL, et al. (2022) Long-term policy impacts of the coronavirus: Normalization, adaptation, and acceleration in the post-COVID state. Policy and Society41(1): 1–12.
10.
CapocciaGKelemenRD (2007) The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics59(3): 341–369.
de La PorteCNataliD (2018) Agents of institutional change in EU policy: The social investment moment. Journal of European Public Policy25(6): 828–843.
18.
DosiG (2021) Policy lessons from medical responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Intereconomics56(6): 337–340.
19.
DosiGFantiLVirgillitoME (2020) Unequal societies in usual times, unjust societies in pandemic ones. LEM Papers Series From Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM) 2020/14. Pisa, Italy: Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, pp. 1–19.
20.
EbbinghausB (2015) The privatization and marketization of pensions in Europe: A double transformation facing the crisis. European Policy Analysis1(1): 56–73.
21.
EbbinghausBLehnerL (2022) Cui bono – business or labour? Job retention policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research28(1) : 47–64.
22.
EichorstWMarxPRinneU (2020) Manoeuvring through the crisis: Labour market and social policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intereconomics55(6): 375–380.
23.
Eurofound (2021) Covid-19: Policy Responses Across Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission (2020b) European Semester: Country-specific recommendations. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, COM(2020) 500 final, 20 May 2020, Brussels.
26.
ETUI (2021) Benchmarking Working Europe. Brussels: ETUI.
27.
FerreraMMiróMRonchiS (2021) Walking the road together? EU polity maintenance during the COVID-19 crisis. West European Politics44(5–6): 1329–1352.
GerbaudoP (2021) The Great Recoil: Politics After Populism and Pandemic. London: Verso Books.
32.
GreerSLKingEJMassard da FonsecaE, et al. (eds) (2021) Coronavirus Politics: The Comparative Politics and Policy of COVID-19. Ann Arbor, IL: University of Michigan Press.
33.
HayC (2004) The normalizing role of rationalist assumptions in the institutionalist embedding of neo-liberalism. Economy and Society33(4): 500–527.
IIPP (2020a) Reshaping global health systems in response to Covid-19. COVID-19 Briefing Paper 03. IIPP Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. London: IIPP.
36.
IIPP (2020b) Inequality, unemployment and precarity. Covid-19 Briefing Paper 02. IIPP Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. London: IIPP.
37.
ILO (2021) World Employment and Social Outlook. Trends 2021. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.
IrvinG (2011) The crisis and the European social model. In: DegryseCNataliD (eds) Social Developments in the European Union 2010. Brussels: ETUI/OSE, pp. 23–52.
40.
JonesLHameiriS (2021) Covid-19 and the failure of the neoliberal regulatory state. Review of International Political Economy. EPub ahead of print 1 March 2021. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2021.1892798.
41.
LadiSTsarouhasD (2020) EU economic governance and Covid-19: Policy learning and windows of opportunity. Journal of European Integration42(8): 1041–1056.
42.
MahoneyJThelenK (eds) (2010) Explaining Institutional Change: Agency, Ambiguity and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
ManciniC (2021) Explorative analysis of European economic post-Covid-19 crisis recovery strategy through the lenses of the new-developmental paradigm. Unpublished work.
MeardiGTassinariA (2022) Crisis corporatism 2.0? The role of social dialogue in the pandemic crisis in Europe. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research28(1): 83–100.
46.
MoreiraAHickR (2021) Covid-19, the Great Recession and social policy: Is this time different?Social Policy and Administration55(2): 261–279.
47.
NataliD (2020) Pensions at the time of Covid-19: Recent changes and future challenges. ETUI Policy Brief 13/20. Brussels: ETUI, pp. 1–5.
48.
NataliDRaitanoM (2022) Digitalization and automation: What challenges for European pension policies? In: BusemeyerMKemmerlingAMarxP, et al (eds) Digitalization and the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 274–289.
49.
ObingerHPetersenKStarkeP (eds) (2018) Warfare and Welfare: Military Conflicts and Welfare State Development in Western Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
OECD (2020a) COVID-19, Protecting People and Societies. Paris: OECD.
51.
OECD (2020b) Beyond Containment: Health Systems Responses to COVID-19 in the OECD. Paris: OECD.
52.
OECD (2020c) OECD Employment Outlook 2020: Worker Security and the COVID-19 Crisis. Paris: OECD.
53.
OECD (2021) Pensions at a Glance. Paris: OECD.
54.
PavoliniESabatinelliSVesanP (2021) I servizi in Italia alla prova della pandemia. Uno sguardo di insieme. Politiche sociali/Social policies8(2): 211–232.
55.
PochetP (2022) From one crisis to another: Changes in the governance of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research28(1): 119–133.
56.
RainoneS (2020) An Overview of the 2020–2021 Country-Specific Recommendations (CSRs) in the Social Field: The Impact of Covid-19. Background Analysis 2020.01. Brussels: ETUI.
57.
ReinhartCMRogoffKS (2011) This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
SchmidtV (2016) Reinterpreting the rules ‘by stealth’ in times of crisis: A discursive institutionalist analysis of the European Central Bank and the European Commission. West European Politics37(6): 1032–1052.
59.
SchmidtVThatcherM (2015) Theorizing ideational continuity: The resilience of neo-liberal ideas in Europe. In: SchmidtVThatcherM (eds) Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–52.
60.
Sjölander-LindqvistALarssonSFavaN, et al. (2020) Communicating about COVID-19 in four European countries: Similarities and differences in national discourses in Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden. Frontiers in Communication: Political Communication and Society. Epub ahead of print 13 November 2020. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2020.593325.
61.
StarkePKaaschAVan HoorenF (2013) The Welfare State as Crisis Manager. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
62.
SumonjaM (2021) Neoliberalism is not dead. On political implications of Covid-19. Capital and Class45(2): 173–181.
63.
SymeonidisGTiniosPChouzourisM (2021) Public pensions and implicit debt: An investigation for EU member states using ageing working group 2021 projections. Risks9(11): 190.
