Implications of The National Employment Savings Trust for Vulnerable Sectors of the UK Labour Market: A Reduced-Form Statistical Evaluation

Abstract

The National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) is a new pension scheme that will be introduced for employees on modest incomes in the UK from 2012. This paper draws out the implications of the NEST, focusing upon low-paid employees and their employers using data from the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings. The results suggest that the NEST will increase labour costs by between 0.6 and 0.8 per cent on average, and have a disproportionate effect on low pay industries and private sector firms employing fewer than 25 employees. The analysis highlights the potential role of the minimum wage to shield low pay workers from paying a share of the subsidies that the NEST will afford to its members.

Keywords

Pension saving low pay employer pension

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brewer

Browne

Emmerson

Goodman

Muriel

Tetlow

(2007), ‘Pensioner poverty over the next decade: what role for tax and benefit reform?’, IFS Commentary103.

Choi

J.J.

Laibson

Madrian

B.C.

Metrick

(2002), ‘Defined contribution pensions: plan rules, paticipation choices, and the path of least resistance’, Tax Policy and the Economy, 16, pp. 67–113.

DWP (2006), Personal Accounts: a new way to save, Norwich, The Stationary Office.

DWP (2006a), Security in Retirement: towards a new pensions systemNorwich, The Stationary Office.

DWP (2009), ‘Saving for retirement: implications of pensions reforms on financial incentives to save for retirement’, DWP Research Report558.

DWP (2010), Workplace Pension Reform Regulations Impact Assessment, 12 January.

Emmerson

Wakefield

(2009), ‘Amounts and accounts: reforming private pension enrolment’, IFS Commentary110.

Forth

Stokes

(2008), ‘Employers' pension provision survey 2007’, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report545.

Levell

May

O'Dea

Phillips

(2009), ‘A survey of the UK benefit system’, Institute for Fiscal Studies Briefing Note, 13.

10.

Madrian

B.C.

Shae

D.F.

(2001), ‘The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behaviour’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, pp. 1149–87.

11.

McKay

(2006), ‘Employers' pension provision survey 2005’, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report 329.

12.

OECD (2009), Pensions at a Glance 2009, Paris, OECD Publishing.

13.

PPI (2007), ‘Will personal accounts increase pension saving’, Briefing Note 42.

14.

Pensions Commission (2004), Pensions: Challenges and Choices, Norwich, The Stationary Office.

15.

Pensions Commission (2005), A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century, Norwich, The Stationary Office.

16.

van de Ven

George

(2011), ‘Financial implications of the National Employment Savings Trust’, Report to the Low Pay Commission, www.lowpay.gov.uk/lowpay/research/pdf/NIESRFinal.pdf.