Until recently, the political influence of trade unions primarily relied on ties to labour-friendly political parties. Since the 1990s, however, party-union relations have deteriorated, forcing unions to consider complementary political strategies. This article reviews different direct democratic instruments at local, national and EU levels. We distinguish popular consultations initiated by government from above from citizens’ initiatives initiated from below and discuss corresponding trade union experiences in Germany, Italy, Ireland, Slovenia and Switzerland. We also analyse the successful right2water European Citizens Initiative (ECI) of the European Federation of Public Service Unions and the failed fair transport ECI of the European Transport Workers’ Federation at EU level. Whereas unions have successfully used direct democratic instruments to (i) defend social achievements or (ii) as a lever to extract policy concessions, direct democracy is also challenging. Successful direct democratic campaigns require unions that are able to mobilise their own rank-and-file and to inspire larger sections of society.
AfonsoAFontanaMPapadopoulosY (2010) Does Europeanisation weaken the Left?Policy & Politics38(4): 565–582.
2.
AllernEHBaleT (eds) (2017) Left-of-Centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
AmableB (2017) Structural Crisis and Institutional Change in Modern Capitalism: French Capitalism in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BéthouxEErneRGoldenD (2018) A primordial attachment to the nation? French and Irish workers and trade unions in past EU referendum debates. British Journal of Industrial Relations. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12303(accessed 22 March 2018).
5.
BeveridgeRNaumannM (2014) Global norms, local contestation: Privatisation and de/politicisation in Berlin. Policy & Politics42(2): 275–291.
BielerA (2017) Fighting for public water: The first successful European Citizens’ Initiative. Interface9(1): 300–326.
8.
CrouchC (2004) Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
9.
CulpepperPD (2014) The political economy of unmediated democracy: Italian austerity under Mario Monti. West European Politics37(6): 1264–1281.
10.
Della PortaDAndrettaMFernandesT. (2016) Late Neoliberalism and Its Discontents in the Economic Crisis: Comparing Social Movements in the European Periphery. Cham: Palgrave, an imprint of Springer.
11.
DobnerP (2013) Quer zum Strom: eine Streitschrift über das Wasser. Berlin: Verlag Klaus Wagenbach.
12.
DølvikJE (1997) Redrawing Boundaries of Solidarity?Oslo: FAFO/Arena.
13.
ErneR (2002) Obligatorisches Referendum, Plebiszit und Volksbegehren — drei Typen direkter Demokratie im europäischen Vergleich. In: SchillerTMittendorfV (eds) Direkte Demokratie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 76–87.
14.
ErneR (2015) A supranational regime that nationalizes social conflict: Explaining European trade unions’ difficulties in politicizing European economic governance. Labor History56(3): 345–368.
15.
ErneRImbodenN (2015) Equal pay by gender and by nationality: A comparative analysis of Switzerland’s unequal equal pay policy regimes across time. Cambridge Journal of Economics39(2): 655–674.
16.
ErneRSchiefS (2017) Strong ties between independent organizations. In: AllernEHBaleT (eds) Left-of-Centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 226–245.
17.
ErneRGrossAKaufmannB. (1995) Transnationale Demokratie. Impulse für ein demokratisch verfasstes Europa. Zurich: Realotopia.
Eurotopia (1995) Eurotopia Thesen vom Herbst 1995. Keine Demokratie ohne Europa. Kein Europa ohne Demokratie. In: ErneRGrossAKaufmannBKlegerH (eds) Transnationale Demokratie. Impulse für ein demokratisch verfasstes Europa. Zurich: Realotopia, pp. 422–430.
20.
GearyJ (2016) Economic crisis, austerity and trade union responses: The Irish case in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations22(2): 131–147.
21.
GobinCErneR (2017) La CES face à une Europe austéritaire. Les mondes du travail20: 71–81.
22.
GreerI (2008) Von sozialen Bewegungen lernen: Ein Impuls für deutsche Gewerkschaften. WSI Mitteilungen4: 205–211.
23.
GroteJSchmitterPC (1999) The renaissance of national corporatism. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research5(1–2): 34–63.
24.
Gumbrell-McCormickRHymanR (2013) Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
HäusermannS (2010) The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HymanR (2010) Trade unions and ‘Europe’: Are the members out of step?Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations65(1): 3–29.
27.
KaufmannB (2012) Transnational ‘babystep’: The European citizens’ initiative. In: SetäläMSchillerT (eds) Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe: Procedures and Consequences of Agenda-setting by Citizens. Houndmills: Palgrave McMillan, pp. 228–242.
28.
KriesiHTrechselA (2008) The Politics of Switzerland: Continuity and Change in a Consensus Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MairP (2013) Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London and New York: Verso Books.
30.
MattinaLCarrieriM (2017) Left-of-centre parties and trade unions in Italy. In: AllernEHBaleT (eds) Left-of-Centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 170–186.
PapadopoulosY (2005) Implementing (and radicalizing) art. I-47.4 of the constitution. Journal of European Public Policy12(3): 448–467.
33.
ParsonN (2017) Left-wing parties and trade unions in France. In: AllernEHBaleT (eds) Left-of-Centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 112–129.
34.
PasquinoGValbruzziM (2017) Italy says no: The 2016 constitutional referendum and its consequences. Journal of Modern Italian Studies22(2): 145–162.
35.
PellegriniL (2012) Liberalizzazione del commercio: Forse ci siamo?Consumatori, Diritti e Mercato2: 30–36.
RutherfordTFrangiL (2016) Overturning Italy’s Article 18: Exogenous and endogenous pressures, and role of the state. Economic and Industrial Democracy. Epub ahead of print 11 March. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X16635830.
40.
SchmitterPCGroteJ (1997) The Corporatist Sisyphus: Past, Present and Future. EUI SPS Working Paper 1997/04. Florence: European University Institute. Available at:http://hdl.handle.net/1814/284(accessed 16 August 2018).
41.
SchmitterPCStreeckW (1999) The Organization of Business Interests: Studying the Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies. MPIfG Discussion paper 99/1. Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
42.
SetäläMSchillerT (eds.) (2012) Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
SpierT (2017) Growing apart? Trade unions and centre-left parties in Germany. In: AllernEHBaleT (eds) Left-of-Centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 130–148.
44.
StanSHelleIErneR (2015) European collective action in times of crisis. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research21(2): 131–139.
45.
StanojevićMKlaričM (2013) The impact of socio-economic shocks on social dialogue in Slovenia. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research19(2): 217–226.
46.
VisserJ (2015) ICTWSS Data Base. Version 5.0. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies AIAS, October 2015. Open access database. Available at: http://www.uva-aias.net/nl/data/ictwss(accessed 16 August 2018).
47.
VogiatzoglouM (2015) Workers’ transnational networks in times of austerity: Italy and Greece. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research21(2): 215–228.
48.
WylerR (2012) Schweizer Gewerkschaften und Europa 1960–2005. Münster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot.
