In a context in which multinational corporations are increasingly able to choose their locations of production, this article examines how social and political governance actors in host regional economies attempt to attract and retain foreign direct investment. Based on a comparative study of two regions in each of Canada, Ireland, Spain and the UK, it shows both national and in some cases sub-national variations in the nature of attempts to attract and retain foreign investment, as well as in the actors involved. The article also discusses how these differences in policy interact with the characteristics of specific foreign investors. Our findings support arguments that attempts to embed regime-shopping firms are facilitated by active governance from social as well as state actors.
AlmondP (2011) The sub-national embeddedness of international HRM. Human Relations64(4): 531–551.
2.
AlmondPFernerATregaskisO (2012) The changing context of regional governance of FDI in England. European Urban and Regional Studies. Epub ahead of print 3 October 2012. DOI:10.1177/0969776412459861.
3.
BaeJChenS-JLawlerJJ (1998) Variations in human resource management in Asian countries: MNC home-country and host-country effects. International Journal of Human Resource Management9(4): 653–670.
4.
BélangerJLévesqueCJalettePMurrayG (2013) Discretion in employment relations policy among foreign-controlled multinationals in Canada. Human Relations66(3): 307–332.
5.
ChristophersonSClarkJ (2009) Remaking Regional Economies: Power, labor and firm strategies in the knowledge economy. London: Routledge.
6.
DelteilVDieuaideP (2012) French multinational companies, new state regulations and changes in the employment relationship during the crisis: the exemplary case of the automobile sector. Transfer18(4): 429–446.
7.
EdwardsTZhangM (2008) Multinationals and national systems of employment relations: Innovators or adapters?Advances in International Management21: 33–58.
8.
ElgerTSmithC (2005) Assembling work: Remaking factory regimes in Japanese multinationals in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
FernerA (1997) Country of origin effects and HRM in multinational companies. Human Resource Management Journal7(1): 19–37.
10.
FernerAQuintanillaJVarulM (2001) Country-of-origin effects, host-country effects, and the management of HR in multinationals: German companies in Britain and Spain. Journal of World Business36(2): 107–127.
11.
FossNPedersenT (2000) Transferring knowledge in MNCs: the role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organisational context. LINK Discussion Paper. Copenhagen Business School, October.
12.
GodardJ (2004) Trade union recognition: statutory unfair labour practice regimes in the USA and Canada. Employment Relations Research Series No. 29. London: DTI.
13.
Gonzalez MenendezM (2011) The determinants of workplace direct participation: evidence from a regional survey. Work Employment & Society25(3): 397–416.
14.
HudsonR (1994) New production concepts, new production geographies? Reflections on changes in the automobile industry. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers19: 331–345.
15.
KristensenPHMorganG (2007) Multinationals and institutional competitiveness. Regulation and Governance1: 197–212.
16.
KristensenPHMorganG (2012) From Institutional Change to Experimentalist Institutions. Industrial Relations51(s1): 413–437.
17.
KristensenPHZeitlinJ (2005) Local players in global games: The strategic constitution of a multinational corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
LamA (2003) Organizational Learning in Multinationals: R&D Networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK. Journal of Management Studies40(3): 673–703.
19.
LevyDL (2008) Political Contestation in Global Production Networks. Academy of Management Review33(4): 943–963.
20.
LoganJ (2002) Consultants, lawyers, and the ‘union free’ movement in the USA since the 1970s. Industrial Relations Journal33(3): 197–214.
21.
MonaghanS (2012) Attraction and Retention of Foreign Direct Investment. The Role of Subnational Institutions in a Small, Highly Globalised Economy. Irish Journal of Management31(2): 45–63.
22.
MorganGKristensenP (2006) The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations59: 1467–1490.
23.
MuellerF (1996) National Stakeholders in the Global Contest for Corporate Investment. European Journal of Industrial Relations2(3): 345–368.
24.
MullerM (1998) Human resource and industrial relations practices of UK and US multinationals in Germany. International Journal of Human Resource Management9(4): 732–749.
25.
Muller CamenMAlmondPGunniglePQuintanillaJTempelA (2001) Between Home and Host Country: Multinationals and Employment Relations in Europe. Industrial Relations Journal32(5): 435–448.
26.
O’BroinDWatersE (2007) Governing below the centre: local governance in Ireland. Dublin: New Island Books.
27.
PhelpsNFullerC (2001) Taking care of business: aftercare and the state – multinational enterprise nexus in Wales. Environment and Planning C19(6): 817–832.
28.
RutherfordTHolmesJ (2008) ‘The flea on the tail of the dog’: power in global production networks and the restructuring of Canadian automotive clusters. Journal of Economic Geography8(4): 519–544.
29.
RutherfordTHolmesJ (2013) (Small) differences that (still) matter? Cross-border regions and work place governance in the Southern Ontario and US Great Lakes automotive industry. Regional Studies47(1): 116–127.
30.
Saka-HelmhoutAGeppertM (2011) Different Forms of Agency and Institutional Influences within Multinational Enterprises. Management International Review51(5): 567–592.
31.
SchmittMSadowskiD (2003) A cost-minimization approach to the international transfer of HRM/IR practices: Anglo-Saxon multinationals in the Federal Republic of Germany. International Journal of Human Resource Management14(3): 409–430.
32.
SorgeA (1991) Strategic Fit and the Societal Effect: Interpreting Cross-National Comparisons of Technology, Organization and Human Resources. Organization Studies12(2): 161–190.
33.
StreeckW (1991) More Uncertainties: German Unions Facing 1992. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society30(3): 317–349.
34.
TraxlerFWoitechB (2000) Transnational Investment and National Labour Market Regimes: A Case of ‘Regime Shopping’?European Journal of Industrial Relations6(2): 141–159.
