Abstract
Background
We have previously shown that, compared with general anesthesia (GA), the procedure of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) facilitates faster recovery of elderly patients from total knee replacement (TKR). Here, we investigated whether the faster recovery is associated with decreased perioperative stress and inflammation and decreased incidences of postoperative complications.
Methods
After randomization, 165 patients aged ≥65 years underwent TKR under GA or PNB. The primary outcomes were the perioperative inflammation and stress levels, based on the serum C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white-blood cell and neutrophil counts, and blood-sugar level. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative complications, including cardiovascular, respiratory, and hepatic or renal complications, insomnia, delirium, electrolyte disturbances, and nausea and vomiting.
Results
The two groups were not significantly demographically different (p > .05). Of the cytokines related to stress and inflammation, the differences of time points were statistically significant between the two groups (p < .01), but two-way ANOVA revealed no interaction between the time points and groups. Incidences of postoperative complications were far lower in PNB group than in GA group (p = .006). Incidences of postoperative respiratory complications (p = .005) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (p = .040) were significantly lower in PNB group than in GA group. There were no significant differences in other complications between the two groups (p > .05).
Conclusions
PNB does not alleviate the stress and inflammation in elderly patients post TKR but significantly reduces the incidences of postoperative complications, especially respiratory complications, and nausea and vomiting. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01871012)
Introduction
Total knee replacement (TKR) is the most common and effective surgical option for moderate-to-severe knee arthritis. The frequency of this surgery in a society is proportional to the percentage of the elderly population with comorbidities and complications, which has been increasing with the aging of modern societies.1,2 To date, either general anesthesia (GA) or local anesthesia (LA) has been used for knee arthroplasty. However, with the increased application of ultrasound and nerve-detection technologies in the clinic, a new procedure called peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) has recently emerged as an alternative approach to the spinal anesthesia during knee surgery, and most likely, it will gradually replace GA and LA as the primary anesthetic during knee arthroplasty.3,4
PNB has emerged as a safe and effective anesthesia method and is widely used in lower limb surgery to provide the optimal perioperative analgesia. 5 There is evidence of the effects of regional anesthesia, such as PNB, on the neuroendocrine response on the functions of immune cells, on gene expression, and on the secretion of inflammatory mediators including cytokines, with considerable advantages over general anesthesia in various surgical procedures.6,7 During surgical procedures, nerve signals at the surgical site are usually completely or partially interrupted by nerve blocks with local anesthetics, and C-fiber blockade may inhibit peripheral inflammation in the corresponding innervated zone. 8 Furthermore, in postoperative patients, peripheral nerve blocks have been shown to attenuate postoperative inflammatory response in knee arthroplasty.9,10
We have previously found that, compared with GA, lumbar plexus and sciatic blocks facilitate faster recovery of the physiological functions, including the cognitive function, of elderly patients post TKR.11–15Perioperative inflammatory response has central involvement in both postoperative complications and postoperative recovery. 16 However, it is currently unclear whether the rapid postoperative recovery of elderly patients who underwent TKR under PNB is associated with reduced perioperative inflammatory response or postoperative complications. Thus, this study aimed to clarify this association. The primary goal of this study was the assessment of the surgery-induced stress and inflammation. The secondary goal was the assessment of the postoperative complications.
Methods
This cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01871012) was performed at the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital between June 2013 and September 2013. The research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital.
Interventions management
PNB, GA, and postoperative pain management were performed as we have previously reported. 11
Randomization, sample-size estimation, and outcome measures
Randomization was performed as we have previously reported. 11 The sample sizes were estimated using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test.
The primary outcomes were perioperative stress and inflammation levels, based on the serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESRs), white-blood cell (WBC) counts, neutrophil (N) percentages, and blood-sugar levels before the surgery (baseline, BL) and on day 1 (D1), D3, D5, and D7 after the surgery. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative complications, including postoperative cardiovascular, respiratory, and hepatic or renal complications, insomnia, delirium, electrolyte disturbances, and PONV.
Statistical analysis
The variables were presented as percentages, numbers, or means ± SDs. Biological data were compared between the groups and time points via two-way ANOVA. The categorical variables (i.e., comorbidities, complications, and gender) were compared using the chi-square test. All the statistical tests were two-sided with a significance level of p < .05.
Results
A total of 356 patients aged ≥65 years were recruited from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital between June 2013 and September 2013. Of them, 138 patients failed the inclusion criteria, did not consent to the study, or voluntarily withdrew before the randomization, and the remaining 218 patients completed the enrollment. Additionally, 5 patients were discharged <7 d after the surgery and were lost to follow-up. We excluded 27 patients from the remaining 213 elderly patients because of having used corticosteroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 14 d before the surgery. Finally, 186 patients were included in the study (96 in GA group and 90 in PNB group) (Figure 1). Flowchart showing subjects enrollment and analysis.
Patient characteristics
Demographic and preoperative data of the study patients.
ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; CAD, coronary artery disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chi-square test.
Levels of inflammation-related cytokines and organ-injury markers
The mean level of each inflammation-related cytokine per group of patients is shown in Figure 2. The mean serum CRP levels in both groups started rising on D1, reached the highest levels on D3, and gradually decreased with time. Although the mean ESRs started rising on D1 as well, they reached the highest levels on D5. Other markers of inflammation, such as WBC count, N percentage, serum IL-6, and blood sugar reached their highest levels on D1 and gradually decreased with time in both groups. Of the cytokine levels, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that the differences of time points were statistically significant between the two groups (p < .01), and there was no interaction between the time points and groups (Figure 2). Cytokine levels of inflammation between GA group and PNBs group.
Mean serum level of creatine kinase isoenzyme-MB gradually rose during the perioperative period but started decreasing on D5 in both groups. Mean levels of HB and protein content gradually declined after the surgery in both groups. The levels of LDH and creatinine were not significantly different between the two groups. Of the levels of organ-injury markers, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that the differences of time points were statistically significant between the two groups (p < .01), and there was no interaction between the time points and groups (Figure 3). Organ injury markers between GA group and PNBs group.
Perioperative complications
Perioperative complications of the subjects between GA group and PNB group.
GA: General Anesthesia; PNB: Peripheral Nerve Blocks; PONV: Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Chi-square test.
Discussion
This study demonstrated that the application of PNB instead of GA during TKR does not affect the postoperative stress and inflammation levels but can significantly reduce the incidences of postoperative complications, especially respiratory complications, as well as nausea and vomiting in elderly Chinese patients.
Inflammatory mediators and stress are usually implicated in the physiological responses of the body or in the pathogeneses of several chronic diseases associated with aging or osteoarthritis, and their levels can dramatically increase by trauma or surgery. Negative consequences of surgical trauma or stress include insomnia, fatigue, prolonged recovery, and postoperative complications. 17 Naturally, elderly patients generally have reduced functional reserves of organ systems, and thus they are less tolerant to surgical trauma than young patients. Consequently, perioperative complications more frequently occur in elderly patients than in young patients. 18
Several studies have shown that postoperative changes in serum levels of certain cytokines are correlated with the degree of postoperative systemic inflammatory response. Substances released by sensory nerve endings produce inflammation in the target tissue after surgical procedures, which is a progress of neurogenic inflammation response. 19 The key point of neurogenic inflammation is the activation of the primary afferent, which cause dorsal root reflexes in the spinal cord. In addition, Blocking the nerve through local anesthetics can reduce the release of substances, such as substance P and calcitonin gene–related peptide, and block neural transmission at the site of tissue injury, thereby alleviating the neurogenic inflammatory response. 20 However, the exact mechanisms are still largely unclear.
Serum levels of IL-6 and CRP are considered excellent markers for the inflammatory phase and prognosis after knee or hip replacement.21–23 Nevertheless, other studies have shown that pre-mature assessment of the IL-6 and CRP levels is not helpful in the diagnosis of sepsis and that fluctuations in the levels after a trauma or surgery should be evaluated with caution. 24 Multiple animal or human experiments have suggested that the physiological advantages of PNB are beyond its pharmacological effects on inflammation.25,26
Other studies have shown that PNB has no positive effect in reducing inflammation in the body. 25 The effects of neuraxial blockade with local anesthetics on postoperative inflammatory response are still controversial. For example, a previous study suggested that a combined continuous lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocks with 0.2% ropivacaine contributed to the attenuation of postoperative inflammatory response, which was demonstrated by decreased CRP and IL-6 concentrations in plasma 24 and 48 h postoperatively.(9 Another clinical study using more extensive nerve blocks, have also indicated attenuated ex vivo pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 production after visceral surgery. 27 However, Moore and coworkers found that the circulating CRP and IL-6 response to pelvic surgery was unaffected by extradural analgesia, 28 which is consistent with the present study where PNB has no positive effect in reducing inflammation.
Several investigators have reported that postoperative changes in serum IL-6 level are not associated with increases in post-operative serum CRP level. 29 PNB does not affect plasma IL-6 level, but this observation may result from the limited sensitivity of ELISA to detect cytokine concentrations. 30 In addition, plasma cytokine levels in patients after a knee operation may be insensitive to the clinical anti-inflammatory treatments. The anti-inflammatory effect of PNB may be related to inhibition of neurogenic inflammation rather than systemic inflammation. It is also possible that the inflammation and tissue damage caused by knee surgery is too strong to outweigh the anti-inflammatory effect of PNB. Another study has found that epidural analgesia instead of GA during abdominal surgery can decrease the postoperative levels of inflammatory factors.31,32
The effect of PNB on biological indicators of inflammation appears to depend on several factors, such as the types of inflammatory markers, the assays used for the assessment, anesthesia techniques, age, and types of surgery. In addition, the therapeutics used and the pathological states of patients may also influence inflammation. Several studies have indicated that corticosteroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may affect the systemic inflammatory response. Therefore, this study excluded 27 patients who took such drugs within 2 weeks before the surgery, in case these drugs may affect the postoperative inflammatory response.
This study did not find any serious organ dysfunction in the assessed elderly patients after the surgery. Additionally, there was no significant difference in levels of organ-injury markers between the two groups. However, incidences of postoperative complications were significantly higher in GA group than in PNB group. The incidence of pulmonary complications after mechanical ventilation was significantly higher in GA group than in PNB group. Laryngeal masks irritate the pharynx, causing significant increases in oral secretions during GA. Since the airway protective reflex is suppressed, some secretions may enter the trachea and bronchi, resulting in pulmonary inflammation. Furthermore, the reduced dosage of general anesthetics during the perioperative period may be another reason underlying the reduced incidences of postoperative pulmonary complications and PONV.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that PNB has no significant effect on post-TKR stress and inflammation but significantly reduces the incidences of postoperative complications, especially postoperative respiratory complications and PONV, in elderly Chinese patients.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Hong Zhang for proofreading activity. Participating Investigator: The authors acknowledge Wei Pan who served as scientific advisor. Participating Investigator: The authors acknowledge Ying Zhao who collected data.
Authors’ contributions
Author Jianwen Jin and author Junle Liu have given substantial contributions to the conception or the design of the manuscript, author Maowei Gong and author Bin Lu to acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors have participated to drafting the manuscript, author Shujun Pei revised it critically. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors report no involvement in the research by the sponsor that could have influenced the outcome of this work.
