Who counts as a woman? A critical discourse analysis of petitions against the participation of transgender athletes in women's sport

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the organizational anti-trans discourse on the presence of transgender athletes in women's sport. To achieve this, the petitions published from 2019 to 2022 on the websites of three US organizations (Save Women's Sports, Independent Council on Women's Sports, and the Women's Sports Policy Working Group) were analyzed. The analysis addressed the research questions of how this discourse defines trans women and trans bodies and reproduces the indispensability of sex segregation in sport competitions. The research revealed that the petitions’ authors identified trans athletes as biological males who have an advantage over cis women. The organizations demand that the protection of women's sport from trans women's participation and women's rights be based on the sex (assigned at birth) category. The article emphasizes that members and allies of these organizations perceive biomedical science as providing objective arguments for the sex dichotomy and the exclusion of trans women from sport competitions. At the same time, the petitions’ authors ignore sociocultural factors that influence the perception of gender dichotomy and athletic performance.

Keywords

transgender sport women anti-trans discourse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bianchi

(2017) Transgender women in sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 44(2): 229–242.

Braumüller

Menzel

Hartmann-Tews

(2020) Gender identities in organized sports—Athletes’ experiences and organizational strategies of inclusion. Frontiers in Sociology 5: 578213.

Briassoulis

(2010) Online petitions: New tools of secondary analysis? Qualitative Research 10(6): 715–727.

Cahn

(2015) Coming on strong: Gender and sexuality in women’s sport. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Devine

Hilton

Howe

, et al. (2022) When Ideology Trumps Science. A response to the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport’s Review on Transwomen Athletes in the Female Category. Available at: https://idrottsforum.org/devineetal221129/ (accessed 5 December 2022).

Devine

(2019) Gender, steroids, and fairness in sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 13(2): 161–169.

Dowling

(2001) The frailty myth: Redefining the physical potential of women and girls. New York: Random House.

Fairclough

(2005) Critical discourse analysis in trans-disciplinary research on social change: Transition, re-scaling, poverty and social inclusion. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 1: 37–58.

Faludi

(1991) Backlash: The undeclared war against women. New York: Crown.

10.

FINA (2022) Policy on eligibility for the men’s and women’s competition categories. Available at: https://resources.fina.org/fina/document/2022/06/19/525de003-51f4-47d3-8d5a-716dac5f77c7/FINA-INCLUSION-POLICY-AND-APPENDICES-FINAL-.pdf (accessed 7 February 2023).

11.

Gill-Peterson

(2014) The technical capacities of the body: Assembling race, technology, and transgender. TSQ 1(3): 402–418.

12.

Gleaves

Lehrbach

(2016) Beyond fairness: The ethics of inclusion for transgender and intersex athletes. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43(2): 311–326.

13.

Griffin

Carroll

(2011) NCAA Inclusion of Transgender Student-Athletes. Indianapolis: National Collegiate Athletic Association. Available at: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/2bc3fc_44693cb5d779311cabc005d959e9486d.pdf (accessed 12 July 2023).

14.

Hansson

Sveningsson

Ganetz

, et al. (2020) Legitimising a feminist agenda: The #metoo petitions in Sweden 2017-2018. Nordic Journal of Media Studies 2(1): 121–132.

15.

Harper

O’Donnell

Khorashad

, et al. (2021) How does hormone transition in transgender women change body composition, muscle strength and haemoglobin? Systematic review with a focus on the implications for sport participation. British Journal of Sports Medicine 55: 865–872.

16.

Hilton

Lundberg

(2021) Transgender women in the female category of sport: Perspectives on testosterone suppression and performance advantage. Sports Medicine 51: 199–214.

17.

Hines

(2019) The feminist frontier: On trans and feminism. Journal of Gender Studies 28(2): 145–157.

18.

Hoad

(2010) Run, caster semenya, run!’: Nativism and the translations of gender variance. Safundi 11(4): 397–405.

19.

IOC (2021) Framework on fairness, inclusion and non-discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sex variations. Available at: https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/News/2021/11/IOC-Framework-Fairness-Inclusion-Non-discrimination-2021.pdf (accessed 7 February 2023).

20.

Jacobsen

Devor

Hodge

(2022) Who counts as trans? A critical discourse analysis of trans Tumblr posts. Journal of Communication Inquiry 46(1): 60–81.

21.

Jones

Arcelus

Bouman

, et al. (2017) Sport and transgender people: A systematic review of the literature relating to sport participation and competitive sport policies. Sports Medicine 47: 701–716.

22.

Karkazis

Jordan-Young

(2018) The powers of testosterone: Obscuring race and regional bias in the regulation of women athletes. Feminist Formations 30(2): 1–39.

23.

Knox

Anderson

Heather

(2019) Transwomen in elite sport: Scientific and ethical considerations. Journal of Medical Ethics 45(6): 395–403.

24.

Magubane

(2014) Spectacles and scholarship: Caster semenya, intersex studies, and the problem of race in feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 39(3): 761–785.

25.

Movement Advancement Project (2023) Equality Maps: Bans on Transgender Youth Participation in Sports. Available at: https://www.mapresearch.org/equality-maps/youth/sports_participation_bans (accessed 23 April 2023).

26.

Moyer

(2022b) An NCAA Policy On Trans Athletes Shouldn’t Take Sport Out of Young Athletes’ Lives. Global Sport Matters, 22 March. Available at: https://globalsportmatters.com/science/2022/03/22/ncaa-policy-trans-athletes-participation-inclusion/ (accessed 12 July 2023).

27.

Moyer

(2022a) Revising trans-exclusionary narratives in women’s sports activism. Who are the “women” of women’s athletics? In: Magrath

(eds) Athletes’ Activism. Contemporary Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 88–98.

28.

NCAA (2022) Board of Governors updates transgender participation policy. Available at: https://www.ncaa.org/news/2022/1/19/media-center-board-of-governors-updates-transgender-participation-policy.aspx (accessed 4 March 2023).

29.

Pape

(2019) Expertise and non-binary bodies: Sex, gender and the case of Dutee Chand. Body & Society 25(4): 3–28.

30.

Pearce

Erikainen

Vincent

(2020) TERF Wars: An introduction. The Sociological Review 68(4): 677–698.

31.

Pigozzi

Bigard

Steinacker

, et al. (2022) Joint position statement of the International Federation of Sports Medicine (FIMS) and European Federation of Sports Medicine Associations (EFSMA) on the IOC framework on fairness, inclusion and non-discrimination based on gender identity and sex variations. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine 8: e001273.

32.

Pike

(2021) Safety, fairness, and inclusion: Transgender athletes and the essence of rugby. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 48(2): 155–168.

33.

Pike

Hilton

Howe

(2021) Faster, higher, stronger. The biological and ethical challenges to including transgender athletes in women’s sports. Ottawa, Ontario: Macdonald-Laurier Institute. Available at: https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Dec2021_Faster_higher_stronger_Pike_Hilton_Howe_PAPER_FWeb.pdf (accessed 7 February 2023).

34.

Posbergh

(2022) Defining “woman”: A governmentality analysis of how protective policies are created in elite women’s sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 57(8): 1350–1370.

35.

Posbergh

(2023) Contradiction of cohesion? Tracing questions of protection and fairness in scientifically driven elite sport policies. Sociology of Sport Journal. Epub ahead of print 14 April 2023. DOI: 10.1123//ssj.2022-0198.

36.

Schilt

Westbrook

(2015) Bathroom battlegrounds and penis panics. Contexts 14(3), 26–31.

37.

Schultz

(2021) Girls are caught in between cis athlete advocates and trans inclusion activists. Outsports, 5 April. Available at: https://www.outsports.com/2021/4/5/22324504/cisgender-girls-women-athletes-trans-inclusion-activists-womens-sports-policy-working-group (accessed 7 February 2023).

38.

Sharrow

(2017) Female athlete” politic: Title IX and the naturalization of sex difference in public policy. Politics, Groups, and Identities 5(1): 46–66.

39.

Sharrow

(2021) Sports, transgender rights and the bodily politics of cisgender supremacy. Laws 10(3): 63.

40.

Sullivan

(2011) Gender verification and gender policies in elite sport: Eligibility and “fair play.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 35(4): 400–419.

41.

Sykes

(2006) Transexual and transgender policies in sport. Women in Sport and Physical-Activity Journal 15: 3–13.

42.

The Birth of ICONS: Inaugural Conference Recap (2022) Video material. Available at: https://www.iconswomen.com/2022-kickoff-conference/ (accessed 27 April 2023).

43.

The GLAAD Accountability Project (n.d.) Available at: https://www.glaad.org/gap/organization/save-womens-sports (accessed 27 April 2023).

44.

Tumin

(2023) Title IX and the New Rule of Transgender Athletes Explained. The New York Times. 7 April. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/article/title-ix-transgender-athletes-school-sports.html (accessed 17 July 2023).

45.

Van Dijk

(1995) Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese Discourse 1: 17–27.

46.

Van Dijk

(2001) Critical discourse analysis. In: Tannen

Schiffrin

(eds) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 352–371.

47.

Vertinsky

(1990) The eternally wounded woman: Women, doctors, and exercise in the late nineteenth century. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

48.

Westbrook

Schilt

(2014) Doing gender, determining gender: Transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society 28(1): 32–57.