Profile of General Practices in Malaysia

Abstract

In this survey all practices under the headings of “Clinics”, “Medical Practitioners” and “Medical Practitioners - Registered” in the Yellow Pages telephone directories for the thirteen states of Malaysia were selected. Those excluded were clinics or medical practitioners who advertised themselves as specialists in other disciplines. A total of 2291 practices were surveyed and a response rate of 51.2% was obtained. 383(33%) of the general practitioners were trained locally for the first degree. 258(22%) had at least one postgraduate qualification. 69(6%) possessed a postgraduate qualification in primary care medicine. About 80% of general practitioners participated in continuing medical education and 4% did research in the last 3 years. 42% were involved in community activities. 75% ran solo practices. Over 90% of the practices opened six or seven days a week. The mean workload per doctor per day was 44.66. Most practices provided a comprehensive range of services including curative, preventive, dispensing services, counselling, laboratory tests, and home visits. 43% of practices had a computer.

Keywords

Computer practice profile primary health care services profile

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Ho TM. The Present Problems and Future Needs of Primary Health Care in Malaysia. Int J Health Serv 1988;18(2):281–91.

2. Health Facts. Information and Documentation System Unit. Ministry of Health, Malaysia, Februry 1997.

3. Aljunid. Role of Primary Care Doctors in Private Sector: An Overview. Paper presented in National Conference in Managed Care, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, August 1996.

4. Fernandez VL. 1985 Singapore Medical Association Lecture. Health Care: Today and Tomorrow. Singapore Med J 1987;28(4): 283–7.

5. Research Committee of the College of General Practitioners, Singapore. General Practice Profile. Singapore Fam Physician 1983;IX(3):112–22.

6. Sturmberg JP. Re-skilling general practice. Results from the Medical Educators Workshop, November 1994. Aust Fam Physician 1995;24(7):1285–7.

7. Grol R , Baker R , Wensing M , Jacobs A. Quality Assurance in general practice: the state of the art in Europe. Fam Pract 1994 Dec;11(4): 460–7.

8. Leesc B , Bosanquet N. Family doctors and change in practice strategy since 1986. Br Med J 1995 Mar 18; 310(6981): 705–8.

9. Bocrma WGW , Van Der Zee J , Fleming DM. Service profiles of general practitioners in Europe. Br J Gen Pract 1997 Aug;47:481–6.

10.

10. Khoo EM , Goh TK. Profile of the general practices participating in the undergraduate teaching programme of the University of Malaya. Med J Malaysia 1996;51(3): 365–71.

11.

11. Lydeard S. The Questionnaire as a Research Tool. Fam Pract 1991;8:84–91.

12.

12. Yeoh PH. Medical manpower needs by the year 2000. (Editorial). Med J Malaysia 1988;43(3): 195–9.

13.

13. Kelly MH , Murray TS. General practitioners' views on continuing medical education. Br J Gen Pract 1994 Oct;44(387):469–71.

14.

14. Barnard A , Kamien M. The reading habits of RACGP Training Program doctors. Aust Fam Physician 1994 Sep;23(9): 1752–6, 1758, 1760.

15.

15. Pitts J , Vincent S. General practitioners' reasons for not attending a higher professional education course. Br J Gen Pract 1994 Jun;44(383):271–3.

16.

16. Fernandez VL. Continuing Medical Education - The Family Physician. Singapore Med J 1987 June; 28(3):259–62.

17.

17. The Royal College of General Practitioners, UK. General practitioner workload. RCGP information sheet No.3. November 1997.

18.

18. Bolton P , Gay R. Review of computer usage among RACGP members. Aust Fam Physician 1995 Oct;24(10):1882–5.

19.

19. Sullivan F , Mitchell E. Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports. Br Med J 1995 Sep 30;311(7009):848–52.

20.

20. Purves IN. The paperless general practice (editorial). Br Med J 1996 May4;312(7039):1112–3.

21.

21. Volodin V. WHO's role and activities in the promotion of diagnostic ultrasound in developing countries. The Fam Physician 1990;2(1):47–50.

22.

22. Smith LF.

Should general practitioners have any role in maternity care in the future?

Br J Gen Pract 1996 Apr;46(405):243–7.

23.

23. Aylin P , Majeed FA , Cook DG. Home visiting by general practitioners in England and Wales. Br Med J 1996 Jul 27;313(7051):207–10.

24.

24. The Royal College of General Practitioners, UK. Profile of UK practices RCGP information sheet No. 2. September 1997.

25.

25. O'Cathain A , Froggctt M , Taylor MP. General practice based physiotherapy: its use and effect on referrals to hospital orthopaedics and rheumatology outpatient departments. Br J Gen Pract 1995 Jul;45(396):352–4.

26.

26. Leese B , Bosanquet N. Change in general practice and its effects on service provision in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics. Br Med J 1995 Aug 26;311(7004):546–50.