Influence of Low Birth Weight on the Intellectual Performance of Children at Entry to First Year of School

Abstract

Influence of low birth weight (LBW) on children at entry to school was studied by comparing a group of LBW children with a group of normal birth weight (NBW) children. A wide variety of study instruments was used to obtain required information and steps were taken to ensure quality of data. Influence of LBW on competency at entry to school was examined while accounting for the possible confounders of the relevant association.

LBW group was found to have a lower level of intellectual performance at the time of school entry. The significant factors influencing this association were: poor socio-economic status, lower duration of pre-school education, lack of availability of reading material and lower nutritional status. However the influence of LBW on performance at entry to school remained significant once the above confounders were controlled. This highlights the need to prevent LBW and to maximize the intellectual ability of LBW survivors by appropriate interventions.

Keywords

low birth weight intellectual performance school

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka. Vital Statistics 1945-1992. Ann Health Bull 1992:14–6.

2. Robinson N M , Robinson H B. A follow up study of children of low birth weight and control children at school age. J Pediatr 1965;3: 425–33

3. Drillien C M. School disposal and performance of children for different birth weight born 1953-1960. Arch Dis Child 1969;44: 562

4. McCormic MC , Gortmaker SL , Sobol AM. Very low birth weight children: behavior problems and school difficulty on a national sample. J Pediatr 1990;117:687–93.

5. Aylward GP , Pfeiffer SI , Wright A , Verhulst SJ. Outcome studies of low birth weight infants published in the last decade: A metaanalysis. J Pediatr. 1989;115:515–20.

6. The infant health and development program. Enhancing the outcomes of low birth weight premature infants: Multisite randomized trial. JAMA 1990;263: 3035–42.

7. Brooks-gunn J , Liaw FR , Klebanov PK. Effect of early intervention on cognitive function of low birth weight pre-term infants. J Pediatr 1992;120:320–9.

8. McCarton CM , Brooks-gunn J , Wallace F et al. Results at age 8 years of early intervention for low birth-weight premature infants. JAMA 1997;277:126–32.

9. Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and metaanalysis. Bull WHO 1987;65(5):663–737.

10.

10. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Willey and sons, 1981; 44–5.

11.

11. Ministry of Education, Sri Lanka. Entry Competency of Sri Lankan children (report). 1988.

12.

12. Schlessman JJ. Multivariate Analysis. In: Schlessman JJ , editor. Case control studies: multivariate Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982;227–80.

13.

13. Hollingshed AS , Redlish F. Social class and mental illness. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1958:381–7.

14.

14. Annonymus. Commentary on current World Health Organization definitions used in peri-natal statistics (editorial). Arch Dis Child 1986;61:708–10.

15.

15. Tanner J. Physical growth and development. In: Forfar JO , Arnil JC , editors. Text book of Pediatrics. Edinburgh: ED publisher, 1984: 278–330.

16.

16. Lloyd BW , Wheldall K. Perks Decontrolled study of intelligence and school performance of very low birth weight children from a defined geographical area. Dev Med Child Neurol 1988;30:36–42.

17.

17. Bjerre I , Hansen E. Psychomotor development and school adjustment of 7 year old children with low birth weight. Acta Paediatr Scand 1976;65:88–96.

18.

18. Andersson HW , Gotlieb SJ , Nelson KG. Home environment and cognitive abilities in infants born for small gestational age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;165(76): 82.

19.

19. Markestad T , Vik T , Ahlaten G et al. Small for gestational age infants born at term: growth and development during the first year of life. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 165(76): 93–101.