Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2026-1
Effect of Contracting Management of Primary Health Care Services on Utilization,Coverage,Quality,and Equity in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This systematic review, conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, aimed to synthesize evidence on the effect of contracting the management of primary health care (PHC) services on utilization, coverage, quality of care, and equity in low- and lower-middle-income countries. Published research and gray literature were searched using PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Google Scholar with relevant keywords. Outcome indicators included overall utilization or coverage for any sickness, maternal care, child care, quality of care, and equitable utilization. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA to calculate pooled estimates of percentage differences in outcomes. A total of 47 137 titles were screened, of which 18 studies met the final inclusion criteria. The review found that PHC contracting significantly increased utilization of PHC services for any sickness by 17%, facility deliveries by 19%, and family planning services by 12%. No significant effect was observed for community antenatal care or skilled birth attendance. Positive effects were also seen for patient satisfaction, while equitable utilization of services showed mixed results. Overall, contracting demonstrated benefits in improving service utilization, coverage, quality of care, and equity. However, assessments that are more rigorous are needed to strengthen the quality of evidence.
MuldoonLKHoggWELevittM.Primary care (PC) and primary health care (PHC). What is the difference?Can J Public Health. 2006;97(5):409-411. doi:10.1007/BF03405354
3.
ShiL.The impact of primary care: a focused review. Scientifica. 2012;2012:432892. doi:10.6064/2012/432892
4.
EzePIdemiliCJLawaniLO.Evaluating health systems’ efficiency towards universal health coverage: a data envelopment analysis. Inquiry. 2024;61:469580241235759. doi:10.1177/00469580241235759
5.
NambiarDSankarDHNegiJNairASadanandanR.Monitoring universal health coverage reforms in primary health care facilities: creating a framework, selecting and field-testing indicators in Kerala, India. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(8):e0236169. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236169
6.
LewinSLavisJNOxmanAD, et al. Supporting the delivery of cost-effective interventions in primary health-care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Lancet. 2008;372(9642):928-939. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61403-8
7.
RohdeJCousensSChopraM, et al. 30 years after Alma-Ata: has primary health care worked in countries?Lancet. 2008;372(9642):950-961. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61405-1
AmeliONewbranderW.Contracting for health services: effects of utilization and quality on the costs of the basic package of health services in Afghanistan. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(12):920-928. doi:10.2471/BLT.08.053108
ZaidiSDasJKJamalW.Government purchasing initiatives involving private providers in the Eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review of impact on health service utilization. BMJ Open. 2023;13(2):e063327. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063327
14.
JoudyianNDoshmangirLMahdaviMTabriziJSGordeevVS.Public-private partnerships in primary health care: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):4. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05979-9
15.
TabriziJSAzami-AghdashSGharaeeH.Public-private partnership policy in primary health care: a scoping review. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720943769. doi:10.1177/2150132720943769
16.
LiuXHotchkissDRBoseS.The effectiveness of contracting-out primary health care services in developing countries: a review of the evidence. Health Policy Plan. 2008;23(1):1-13. doi:10.1093/heapol/czm042
17.
OdendaalWAWardKUnekeJ, et al. Contracting out to improve the use of clinical health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;4(4):CD008133. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008133.pub2
ChaimaniAMavridisDSalantiG.A hands-on practical tutorial on performing meta-analysis with STATA. Evid Based Ment Health. 2014;17(4):111-116. doi:10.1136/eb-2014-101967
21.
GuyattGHOxmanADVistGE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-926. doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
22.
McMaster University Evidence Prime. GRADEpro guideline development tool [Software] 2025. Accessed August 19, 2025. https://gradepro.org
23.
ImtiazAFarooqGHaqZUAhmedAAnwarS.Public-private partnership and utilization of maternal and child health services in district Abbottabad, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29(2):275-279.
24.
MalikMAVan de PoelEVan DoorslaerE.Did contracting affect the use of primary health care units in Pakistan?Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(7):1032-1041. doi:10.1093/heapol/czx040
25.
ZaidiSRiazARabbaniF.Can contracted-out health facilities improve access, equity, and quality of maternal and newborn health services? Evidence from Pakistan. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:54. doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0041-8
26.
TanzilSZahidieAAhsanAKaziAShaikhBT.A case study of outsourced primary healthcare services in Sindh, Pakistan: is this a real reform?BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:277. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-277
27.
LoevinsohnBHaqIUCouffinhalAPandeA.Contracting-in management to strengthen publicly financed primary health services—the experience of Punjab, Pakistan. Health Policy. 2009;91(1):17-23. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.10.015
MartinezJPearsonMEnglandR. Third Party Evaluation Report of the PPHI in Pakistan: Findings, Conclusion and Recommendations. Technical Resource Facility; 2011. Accessed May 23, 2023. https://www.pphisindh.org/TPE.pdf
30.
RiazBKAliLAhmadSAIslamMZAhmedKRHossainS.Community clinics in Bangladesh: a unique example of public-private partnership. Heliyon. 2020;6(5):e03950. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03950
31.
AlbisMLFBhadraSKChinB. Impact evaluation of contracting primary health care services in urban Bangladesh. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):854. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4406-5
32.
HeardANathDKLoevinsohnB.Contracting urban primary healthcare services in Bangladesh—effect on use, efficiency, equity and quality of care. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18(7):861-870. doi:10.1111/tmi.12113
33.
SchwartzJBBhushanI.Improving immunization equity through a public-private partnership in Cambodia. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(9):661-667.
ArurAPetersDHansenPMashkoorMASteinhardtLCBurnhamG.Contracting for health and curative care use in Afghanistan between 2004 and 2005. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25(2):135-144. doi:10.1093/heapol/czp045
37.
AlongeOGuptaSEngineerCSalehiASPetersDH.Assessing the pro-poor effect of different contracting schemes for health services on health facilities in rural Afghanistan. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(10):1229-1242. doi:10.1093/heapol/czu127
38.
GatakaaHOmbechEOmondiR.Expanding access to maternal, newborn and primary healthcare services through private-community-government partnership clinic models in rural Kenya: the Ubuntu-Afya kiosk model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):914. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4759-9
39.
BaigMBPandaBDasJKChauhanAS.Is public-private partnership an effective alternative to government in the provision of primary health care? A case study in Odisha. J Health Manag. 2014;16(1):41-52. doi:10.1177/0972063413518679
40.
FarahbakhshMSadeghi-BazarganiHNikniazATabriziJSZakeriAAzamiS.Iran’s experience of health cooperatives as a public-private partnership model in primary health care: a comparative study in East Azerbaijan. Health Promot Perspect. 2012;2(2):287-298. doi:10.5681/hpp.2012.034
41.
SlackKSavedoffWD.Public Purchaser-Private Provider Contracting for Health Services: Examples From Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank; 2023.
42.
CristiaJPradoAGPeluffoC.The impact of contracting in and contracting out basic health services: the Guatemalan experience. World Dev. 2015;70:215-227. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.02.003
43.
MillsAPalmerNGilsonL, et al. The performance of different models of primary care provision in Southern Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(5):931-943. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.015
44.
MudendaDChompololaAChitahBWakeWMapowaCC. Provider Purchasing and Contracting for Health Services: The Case of Zambia. International Household Survey Network; 2008. Accessed June 3, 2023. https://catalog.ihsn.org/citations/37500
45.
ChansaCMukanuMMChama-ChilibaCM.Looking at the bigger picture: effect of performance-based contracting of district health services on equity of access to maternal health services in Zambia. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(1):36-46. doi:10.1093/heapol/czz130
46.
LawnJERohdeJRifkinSWereMPaulVKChopraM.Alma-Ata 30 years on: revolutionary, relevant, and time to revitalize. Lancet. 2008;372(9642):917-927. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61402-6
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
