PiehCO’RourkeTBudimirSProbstT. Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0238906.
3.
LovibondPFLovibondSH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33:335-343.
4.
FletcherGJSimpsonJAThomasG. The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: a confirmatory factor analytic approach. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2000;26:340-354.
5.
XiongJLipsitzONasriF, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:55-64.
6.
Günther-BelCVilaregutACarratalaETorras-GaratSPérez-TestorC. A mixed-method study of individual, couple, and parental functioning during the state-regulated COVID-19 lockdown in Spain. Fam Process. 2020;59:1060-1079.
7.
KayserKAcquatiCReeseJBMarkKWittmannDKaramE. A systematic review of dyadic studies examining relationship quality in couples facing colorectal cancer together. Psychooncology. 2018;27:13-21.
8.
StanleySMMarkmanHJ. Helping couples in the shadow of COVID-19. Fam Process. 2020;59:937-955.
9.
ArafatSMYMohamedAAKarSKSharmaPKabirR. Does COVID-19 pandemic affect sexual behaviour? A cross-sectional, cross-national online survey. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113050. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113050
10.
PanzeriMFerrucciRCozzaAFontanesiL. Changes in sexuality and quality of couple relationship during the Covid-19 lockdown. Front Psychol. 2020;11:565823.
