The Use of Total Assets as a Proxy for Socioeconomic Status in Northern Vietnam

Abstract

Recently, total assets have become a popular method to capture socioeconomic status (SES) for health research/intervention done in developing countries. Although, this method is suitable for areas in a rural setting, there are 2 major issues in applying this method: (a) which durable assets/infrastructure or housing characteristics truly reflect the family SES and (b) how to aggregate different variables to get a derived index of SES and produce a range of critical points differentiating socioeconomic levels. This study aims to validate the use of total asset as proxy for SES by addressing these issues. Results indicated that (a) variables reflecting family SES in rural setting area include variables capturing access to utilities and infrastructure, housing characteristics, and durable asset ownership; (b) principal component analysis is a suitable method to construct a derived index from multiple variables; and (c) the derived index is a valid indicator for SES in rural setting area.

Keywords

indicator of socioeconomic status total assets principal component analysis low birth weight

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cameron

Norman

. Socioeconomic status and the health of the population. Med Care. 1995;33: DS43-DS50.

Robert

. Socioeconomic position and health: the independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Annu Rev Sociol. 1999;25:509-516.

Krieger

Williams

Moss

. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:341-378.

McKenzie

. Measure Inequality With Asset Indicators (BREAD Working Paper No. 042). Cambridge, MA: Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development, Center for International Development, Harvard University; 2003.

Montgomery

Gragnolati

Burke

Paredes

. Measuring living standards with proxy variables. Demography. 2000;37:155-174.

Vyas

Kumaranayake

. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21:459-468.

Howe

Hargreaves

Huttly

. Issues in the construction of wealth indices for the measurement of socio-economic position in low-income countries. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2008;5:3.

Abeyasekera

. Multivariate methods for index construction. In: The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations, ed. Household Sample Surveys in Developing and Transition Countries. New York, NY: United Nations; 2005:367-388.

Jolliffe

. Principal Component Analysis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002.

10.

Hirve

Ganatra

. Determinants of low birth weight: a community based prospective cohort study. Indian J Pediatr. 1994;31:1221-1225.

11.

Filmer

Pritchett

. Estimating wealth effect without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001;38:115-132.

12.

Hargreaves

Morison

Gear

. Assessing household wealth in health studies in developing countries: a comparison of participatory wealth ranking and survey techniques from rural South Africa. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2007;4:4.

13.

Howe

Hargreaves

Gabrysch

Huttly

SRA

. Is the wealth index a proxy for consumption expenditure? A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63:871-877.