Migration and Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Neo-Migrants and Settled-Migrants in Delhi,India

Abstract

Understanding the blood pressure (BP) distribution within populations is fundamental to an understanding of the etiology of cardiovascular diseases and to develop effective preventive strategies. This study focuses on whether the BP levels and hypertension prevalence differ between neo-migrants and settled-migrants in the city of Delhi. Data on BP, anthropometry, social variables, and demographic variables were collected from a cross-sectional sample of 226 settled-migrants and 227 neo-migrants. Men possessed significantly higher BP levels than women. Settled-migrants possessed higher BP levels, except diastolic BP in males. The prevalence of hypertension ranges from 15% (neo-migrant women) to 25% (settled-migrant men), with no significant gender differences. Group differences were significant for men. Hypertension was more prevalent in older settled-migrants and younger neo-migrants. Recent migration was found to be a significant contributor to hypertension prevalence. Age contributed significantly to BP variation in both groups except in neo-migrant men. Pulse rate also contributed to systolic BP among neo-migrant women and settled-migrant men. Thus, urban residence and migration to urban areas can be a leading cause of increased prevalence of hypertension. Neo-migrants were subjected to more lifestyle insults and the stress generated during the adjustment process may be contributing to rise of BP even at younger ages.

Keywords

blood pressure hypertension migration urban India cross-sectional study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Whelton PK Epidemiology of hypertension. Lancet. 1994 ;344:101-106.

World Health Organization. World Health Report. Reducing Risks Promoting Healthy Lifestyle. Geneva, Switzerland : World Health Organization; 2002 .

Howson CP , Reddy KS , Ryan TJ , Bale RB Control of Cardiovascular Diseases in Developing Countries: Research, Development, and Institutional Strengthening. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1998.

Ezzati M. , Lopez AD , Rodgers A. , Vander Hoorn S. , Murray CJ The comparative risk assessment collaborating group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002;360:1347-1360.

Gupta R. Trends in hypertension epidemiology in India. J Hum Hypertens . 2004;18:73-78.

Sarvotham SG , Berry JN Prevalence of coronary heart disease in an urban population in northern India. Circulation. 1968;37:939-953.

Gupta SP , Malhotra KC Urban-rural trends in the epidemiology of coronary heart disease. J Assoc Physicians India. 1975;23:885-892.

Jajoo UN , Kalantri SP , Gupta OP , Jain AP , Gupta K. The prevalence of coronary heart disease in rural population from central India. J Assoc Physicians India. 1998;36:689-693.

Reddy BN Blood pressure and adiposity: a comparative study of socio-economically diverse groups of Andhra Pradesh, India. Am J Hum Biol. 1998;10:5-21.

10.

Reddy KK , Rao AP , Reddy TP Socioeconomic status and the prevalence of coronary heart disease risk factors . Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11:98-103.

11.

Kusuma YS , Babu BV , Naidu JM Prevalence of hypertension in some cross-cultural populations of Visakhapatnam district, South India. Ethn Dis. 2004;14:250-259.

12.

Reddy KS , Naik N. , Prabhakaran D. Hypertension in the developing world: a consequence of progress. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2006;6:399-404.

13.

Dressler WW , Santos JE Social and cultural dimensions of hypertension in Brazil: a review. Cad Saude Publica. 2000;16:303-315.

14.

Poulter NR , Khaw KT , Hopwood BE , et al. The Kenyan Luo migration study: observations on the initiation of a rise in blood pressure. BMJ. 1990;300:967-972.

15.

Bursztyn M. , Raz I. Blood pressure and insulin in Ethiopian immigrants: longitudinal study. J Hum Hypertens. 1995;9:245-248.

16.

Sobngwi E. , Mbanya JC , Unwin NC , et al. Exposure over the life course to an urban environment and its relation with obesity, diabetes, and hypertension in rural and urban Cameroon . Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:769-776.

17.

Census of India: Provisional Population Tables. New Delhi , India: Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, Government of India; 2001.

18.

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. Demographic profile. In: Economic Survey of Delhi, 2005-2006 . New Delhi, India: Planning Department, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi; 2006 :17.

19.

Lwanga SK , Lemeshow S. Sample Size Estimation in Health Studies. A Practical Manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1991.

20.

Rose GA , Blackburn H. , Gillum RF , Prinneas RJ Cardiovascular Survey Methods. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1982.

21.

National Institutes of Health. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. USA Publication No. 04-5230. 2004. Bestheda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2004.

22.

Weiner JS , Lourie, JA Practical Human Biology. London, UK: Academic Press; 1981.

23.

Labarthe DR Epidemiology and Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases. A Global Challenge . Rockville, MD: Aspen; 1998.

24.

Das SK , Sanyal K. , Basu A. Study of urban community survey in India: growing trend of high prevalence of hypertension in a developing country. Int J Med Res. 2005;2:70-78.

25.

Reddy KS , Prabhakaran D. , Chaturvedi V. , et al. Methods for establishing a surveillance system for cardiovascular diseases in Indian industrial populations. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84: 461-469.

26.

Kusuma YS , Babu BV , Naidu JM Blood pressure levels among a few cross-cultural populations of Visakhapatnam district, South India. Ann Hum Biol. 2002;29:502-512.

27.

Haldiya KR , Mathur ML , Sachdev R. , Saiyed HN Risk of high blood pressure in salt workers working near salt milling plants: a cross-sectional and interventional study. Environ Health . 2005;4:13.

28.

Deshmukh PR , Gupta SS , Dongre AR , et al. Relationship of anthropometric indicators with blood pressure levels in rural Wardha. Indian J Med Res . 2006;123:657-664.

29.

Perez-Fernandez R. , Marino AF , Cadarso-Suarez C. , et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Galicia (Spain) and association with related diseases. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;5:366-373.

30.

Rice T. , Nirmala A. , Reddy PC , Ramana PV , Sreeramakrishna K. , Rao DC Familial resemblance of blood pressure with residual household environmental effects in consanguineous and non-consanguineous families from Andhra Pradesh, India. Hum Biol. 1992;4:869-889.

31.

Gershater E. , McGarvey ST Fourteen year changes in adiposity and blood pressure in American Samoan adults. Am J Hum Biol. 1995;7:597-606.

32.

Mukhopadhyay B. , Mukhopadhyaya S. , Majumder PP Blood pressure profile of Lepchas of Sikhim Himalayas: epidemiological study. Hum Biol. 1996;68:131-145.

33.

Kusuma YS , Babu BV , Naidu JM Group- and sex-specific effects of age, body composition and pulse rate on blood pressure variability in some cross-cultural populations of Visakhapatnam district, South India. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2001;8:337-347.

34.

Dressler WW , Balieiro MC , Ribeiro RP , Dos Santos JE Cultural consonance and arterial blood pressure in urban Brazil. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:527-540.

35.

McEwan BS , Stellar, E. Stress and the individual: mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2093-2101.

36.

Thomas RB The evolution of human adaptability paradigms: towards a biology of poverty . In: Goodman AH , Leatherman TL , eds. Building a New Biocultural Synthesis: Political-Economic Perspectives on Human Biology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1998:43-74.

37.

Berkman L. The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosom Med. 1994;57:245-254.

38.

Niakara A. , Fournet F. , Gary J. , Harang M. , Nebie L. , Salem G. Hypertension, urbanization, social and spatial disparities: a cross-sectional population-based survey in a West African urban environment (Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso). Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 ;101:1136-1142.