Through a gravity model, the paper attempts to analyse the impact of exchange rate uncertainty on India’s gross bilateral trade flows between its top five trading partners and its SAARC partners. Categorising the industries into five segments, namely, agricultural raw materials, chemicals, textile and clothing, metals and all other commodities, over 18 years (2000–2018), a panel data technique has been applied to examine the effect. The empirical result suggests that even though an exchange rate uncertainty shrinks the bilateral trade flows of agricultural raw materials for SAARC members, it enhances the trade flows across all industry verticals for the top five trading partners. Following the gravity model of trade, the study further suggests that the volume of bilateral trade between countries is proportional to the product of each country’s economic growth and inversely proportional to the distance between them.
AristotelousK. (2001). Exchange-rate volatility, exchange-rate regime, and trade volume: Evidence from the UK–US export function (1889–1999). Economics Letters, 72(1), 87–94.
2.
ArizeA. C., OsangT., & SlottjeD. J. (2000). Exchange-rate volatility and foreign trade: Evidence from thirteen LDCs. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 18(1), 10–17.
3.
ArizeA. C., OsangT., & SlottjeD. J. (2008). Exchange-rate volatility in Latin America and its impact on foreign trade. International Review of Economics & Finance, 17(1), 33–44.
4.
AyeG. C., GuptaR., MoyoP. S., & PillayN. (2015). The impact of exchange rate uncertainty on exports in South Africa. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 6(1), 1550004.
5.
BatraA. (2006). India’s global trade potential: The gravity model approach. Global Economic Review, 35(3), 327–361.
6.
BhattacharyaS. K., & BhattacharyayB. N. (2007). Gains and losses of India–China trade cooperation: A gravity model impact analysis(CESifo Working Paper, No. 1970). Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich.
7.
BhattacharyyaR., & BanerjeeT. (2006). Does the gravity model explain India’s direction of trade? A panel data approach. Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad(Working paper 2006-09-01).
8.
BurangeL. G., & KarnikN. N. (2014). An analysis of India’s bilateral merchandise trade with SAARC(Working Paper 5). http://iire.in/ojs/index.php
9.
ChenX., YangZ., & LiuX. (2008). Empirical analysis of Xinjiang’s bilateral trade: Gravity model approach. Chinese Geographical Science, 18, 9–16.
10.
ChoG., SheldonI. M., & McCorristonS. (2002). Exchange rate uncertainty and agricultural trade. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4), 931–942.
11.
EvenettJ. S., & KellerW. (2002). On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 281–316.
12.
FrankelJ. A., & RoseA. (2002). An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 437–466.
13.
HaiderS., & AdilM. H. (2017). An analysis of impact of exchange rate volatility on the Indian manufacturing exports. University Library of Munich, Germany.
14.
HiranthaS. W. (2004). From SAPTA to SAFTA: Gravity analysis of South Asian free trade. European Trade Study Group (ETSG).
15.
HooperP., & KohlhagenS. W. (1978). The effect of exchange rate uncertainty on the prices and volume of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 8(4), 483–511.
16.
HooyC. W., & ChoongC. K. (2010). The impact of exchange rate volatility on world and intra-trade flows of SAARC countries. Indian Economic Review, 45(1), 67–86.
17.
JainR., & SinghJ. B. (2009). Trade pattern in SAARC countries: Emerging trends and issues. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 30(3), 73–117.
18.
KepaptsoglouK., TsamboulasD., KarlaftisM. G., & MarzanoV. (2009). Free trade agreement effects in the Mediterranean region: An analytic approach based on SURE gravity model. Transportation Research Record, 2097(1), 88–96.
19.
KleinM. W. (1990). Sectoral effects of exchange rate volatility on United States exports. Journal of International Money and Finance, 9(3), 299–308.
20.
KienN. T. (2009). Gravity model by panel data approach: An empirical application with implications for the ASEAN free trade area. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 26, 266–277.
21.
KumarR. (2020). India & South Asia: Geopolitics, regional trade and economic growth spillovers. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 29(1), 69–88.
22.
MohantyS. (2005). Is South Asian economic cooperation sustainable?: Strategy for meaningful transition from SAPTA to SAFTA. Global Trade Analysis Project.
23.
PolakJ. J. (1998). The IMF monetary model at 40. Economic Modelling, 15(3), 395–410.
24.
RahmanM. M. (2010). The factors affecting Bangladesh’s exports: Evidence from the gravity model analysis. The Journal of Developing Areas, 44, 229–244.
25.
SauerC., & BoharaA. K. (2001). Exchange rate volatility and exports: Regional differences between developing and industrialized countries. Review of International Economics, 9(1), 133–152.
26.
SukarA. H., & HassanS. (2001). US exports and time-varying volatility of real exchange rate. Global Finance Journal, 12(1), 109–119.
27.
YamarikS., & GhoshS. (2015). Broad versus regional integration: What matters more for economic development?The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 24(1), 43–75.
