Anderson, James E. (1979), ‘A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation’ , American Economic Review, 69 (1): 106–16 .
2.
Anderson, James E. E. and Eric Van Wincoop (2001), ‘Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle’, NBER working paper no. 8079 .
3.
Baldwin, R.E. (1994), Towards an Integrated Europe. London: CEPR .
4.
Bhagwati, J.N. (1992), ‘Regionalism and Multilateralism’ , The World Economy, 15 (5): 535–56 .
5.
Bhagwati, J.N. (1993), ‘Regionalism and Multilateralism; An Overview’, in J. de Melo and A. Panagari ya (eds), New Dimensions in Regional Integration, pp. 22–51. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bergstrand, Jeffrey (1985), ‘The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67 (August): 474–81.
7.
Bergstrand, Jeffrey (1989), ‘The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor—Proportions Theory in International Trade’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71 (February): 143–53.
8.
Breuss, F. and P. Egger (1997), ‘The Use and Misuse of Gravity Equations in European Integration Research’, WIFO Working Paper .
9.
Deardorff, Alan V. (1995), ‘Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?’, in Jeffrey A. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp . 7–28.
10.
Egger, P. (2000), ‘A Note on the Proper Econometric Specification of Gravity Equation’ , Economics Letters, 66: 25–31 .
11.
Egger, P. (2001), ‘An Econometric View on the Estimation of Gravity Potentials and the Calculation of Trade Potentials’, Working Paper, Austrian Institute of Economic Research, Vienna .
12.
Feenstra, Robert C. , James A. Markusen and Andrew K. Rose (2001), ‘Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate among Alternative Theories of Trade’ , Canadian Journal of Economics, 34 (2): 430–47 .
13.
Frankel, J. (1997), Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System, Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics .
14.
Frankel, J. , E. Stein and S. Wei (1995), ‘Trading Blocs and the Americas: The Natural, the Unnatural and the Super Natural’ , Journal of Development Economics, 47 (1): 61–95 .
15.
Ghosh, Madanmohan (2002), ‘The Revival of Regional Trade Arrangements: Implications for Indian Trade Policy’, in Parthasarathi Banerjee and Frank-Jurgen Richter (eds), Economic Institutions in India: Sustainability under Liberalization and Globalization, pp. 237–62. London, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
Gros, D. and A. Gonciarz (1996), ‘A Note on the Trade Potential of Central and Eastern Europe’ , European Journal of Political Economy, 12: 709–21 .
17.
Hamilton, Carl , and L. Alan Winters (1992), ‘Opening up Trade with Eastern Europe’ , Economic Policy, 14: 77–176 .
18.
Helpman, E. (1987), ‘Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries’ , Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 1: 62–81 .
19.
Helpman, E. and P.R. Krugman (1985), Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press .
20.
Harrigan, James (2002), ‘Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?’, NBER Working Paper no. W 8675 (December).
21.
Hassan, M. Kabir (2001), ‘Is SAARC a Viable Economic Block? Evidence from Gravity Model’ , Journal of Asian Economies, 12 (2): 263–90 .
22.
Helliwell, John F. (1997), ‘National Borders, Trade, and Migration’, NBER Working Paper no. 6027.
23.
Hummels, David (1999), ‘Toward a Geography of Trade Costs’, manuscript, Purdue University .
24.
Krishnakumar, Jaya (2002), ‘A SUR-EC-AR System Gravity Model of Trade’, University of Geneva .
25.
Krugman, P. (1991), ‘Is Bilateralism Bad?’, in E. Helpman and A. Raz in (eds), International Trade and Trade Policy, pp. 9–23. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.
26.
Lahiri, S. (1998), ‘Controversy: Regionalism vs Multilateralism’ , Economic Journal, 108 (449): 1126–27 .
27.
Lai Huiwen , and Daniel Trefler (1999), ‘The Gains from Trade: Standard Errors with the CES Monopolistic Competition Model’, manuscript, University of Toronto .
28.
Linnemann, H. (1966), An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North Holland .
29.
Matyas, L. (1997), ‘Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model’ , The World Economy, 20: 363–68 .
30.
Mehta, R. and S.K. Bhattacharya (2000), ‘The South Asian Preferential Trading Arrangement: Impact on Intra-Regional Trade’ , The Asia Pacific Journal of Economics and Business, 4 (1): 92–111 .
31.
Olsen, E. (1971), International Trade Theory and Regional Income Differences. Amsterdam: North Holland .
32.
Panagariya, A. (1995), ‘The Free Trade Area of the Americas: Good for Latin America?’ , The World Economy, 19: 485–515 .
33.
Poyhonen, P. (1963), ‘A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries’ , Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, 90: 93–99 .
34.
Srinivasan, T.N. and G. Canonero (1993), ‘Preferential Trading Arrangements in South Asia: Theory, Empirics and Policy’, IED/International Economics Seminars, 1 May, Boston University .
Tinbergen, J. (1962), Shaping the World Economy: Suggesstions for an International Economic Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund. UNCTAD (2003), Handbook of Statistics (CD ROM).
37.
Wang, Z.K. and L.A. Winters (1991), ‘The Trading Potential of Eastern Europe, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 610, CEPR, London.
38.
Wooldridge, J.M. (2000), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cincinnati: South Western College Publishing .