The effects of a unilateral cut in emissions (e.g., by Annexure 1 countries in Kyoto) are analysed in a dynamic two-country two-commodity model. If the fossil fuel is priced at marginal cost, then a unilateral cut reduces total emissions (the carbon leakage is less than 100%). But if the fuel is priced above marginal cost, then a ‘green paradox’ appears, that is, the price of the fuel will fall until its use (over time) exhausts the entire stock. Here, a unilateral policy is self-defeating and it is necessary to get binding commitments on fossil fuel use from all the countries. The production and trade implications for the participant and non-participant countries are analysed.
AcemogluD.AghionP.BursztynL.HemousD. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166.
2.
BabikerM. H. (2005). Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. Journal of International Economics, 65(2), 421–445.
3.
BarrettS. (2003). Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BondE. W.IwasaK.NishimuraK. (2011). A dynamic two country Heckscher–Ohlin model with non-homothetic preferences. Economic Theory, 48(1), 171–204.
5.
BurniauxJ.-M.MartinsJ. O. (2000). Carbon emission leakage: A general equilibrium view (OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 242)Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
6.
ChakravortyU.LeachA.MoreauxM. (2011). Would hotelling kill the electric car? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(3), 281–296.
7.
ChatterjiS.GhoshalS.WalshS.WhalleyJ. (2011). Unilateral measures emissions mitigation (NBER Working Paper No. 15441)Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
ChenZ. (1992). Long-run equilibria in a dynamic Heckscher–Ohlin model. Canadian Journal of Economics, 25(4), 923–943.
9.
CopelandB.TaylorS. (2005). Free trade and global warming: A trade theory view of the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49(2), 205–234.
10.
MariaDi C. Werfvan der E. (2008). Carbon leakage revisited: Unilateral climate policy with directed technical change. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39(2), 55–74.
11.
DuttaP.RadnerR. (2012). Capital growth in a global warming model: Will China and India sign a climate treaty? Economic Theory, 49(2), 411–443.
12.
EichnerT.PethigR. (2011). Carbon leakage, the green paradox and perfect futures markets. International Economic Review, 52(3), 767–805.
13.
FinusM. (2001). Game theory and international environmental cooperation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14.
GerlaghR. (2011). Too much oil. CESifo Economic Studies, 57(1), 79–102.
15.
GraftonQ.KompasT.van LongN. (2010). Bio-fuels subsidies and the green paradox (CESifo Working Paper No. 2960)Munich: CESifo.
16.
HenrietF. (2012). Optimal extraction of a polluting nonrenewable resource with R&D toward a clean backstop technology. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 14(2), 311–347.
17.
HoelM. (2010). Is there a green paradox (CESifo Working Paper No. 3168)Munich: CESifo.
18.
IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007 (Vols. I, II, III). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19.
IshikawaJ.KiyonoK. (2006). Greenhouse gas emission controls in an open economy. International Economic Review, 47(2), 431–450.
20.
SenP. (2012). Fossil fuel use restrictions and the world interest rate (Mimeo).Delhi: Delhi School of Economics.
21.
SenP. (2016). Unilateral emission cuts and carbon leakages in a dynamic north–south trade model. Environment and Resource Economics, 64(1), 131–152.
22.
SinnH.-W. (2008). Public policies against global warming: A supply side approach. International Tax and Public Finance, 15(4), 360–394.
23.
SmuldersS.TsurY.ZemelA. (2010). Announcing climate policy: Can a green paradox arise without scarcity? (CESifo Working Paper No. 3307). Munich: CESifo.
24.
StrandJ. (2010). Optimal fossil-fuel taxation with backstop technologies and tenure risk. Energy Economics, 32(2), 418–422.
25.
Van der PloegF.WithagenC. (2010). Is there really a ‘green paradox’? (OxCarre Discussion Paper No. 35). Oxford: Oxford University.
26.
Van der PloegF.WithagenC. (2011). Growth and the optimal carbon tax: When to switch from exhaustible resources to renewable? (OxCarre Discussion Paper No. 55. Oxford: Oxford University
27.
Van der PloegF.WithagenC. (2012). Too much coal, too little oil. Journal of Public Economics, 96(1), 62–77.
28.
Van der PloegF.WithagenC. (2015). Global warming and the green paradox: A review of adverse effects of climate policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 9(2), 285–303.
29.
WhalleyJ. (2011). What role for trade in a post 2012 global climate policy regime? (NBER Working Paper No. 17498). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
