This article aims to deconstruct the idea of ‘grievance’ as the factor that anchors the behaviour of the emerging powers from the Global South, which have a shared history of colonialism. This article applies with postcolonialism as a broader theoretical concept, this article brings in its influence on the history of colonialism in terms of framing or shaping their behaviour towards the international order, which is fundamentally Western-led. The recent war in Ukraine and the approach of the Global South towards the war serve as a testament to their ambivalent stance regarding the understanding of war crimes and violations of international laws. In this study, cases have been selected from the Global South’s five emerging powers: Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico and South Africa. The rationale for selecting these case studies is that all five countries are democracies, serve as regional powers in their respective areas and share a common history of colonialism. The qualitative discourse analysis of the article analyses the role of historical grievances, economic interests and geopolitical considerations. The dataset follows primary and secondary sources, especially briefs, commentaries, reports and working papers from notable think tanks, press briefs, releases and speeches of leaders, spokespersons and diplomats. The results of the study show that historical grievances still work as a factor in characterizing the sceptical view of Western motives. The Global South is looking for the construction of a just and reasonable liberal international order.
AcemogluD. (2017, January30). The economic impact of colonialism. CEPR VoxEU. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/economic-impact-colonialism
2.
Agence France-Presse. (2023, September19). Brazil’s president urges ‘dialogue’ to achieve peace in Ukraine. Voice of America. https://www.voaafrica.com/a/brazil-s-president-urges-dialogue-to-achieve-peace-in-ukraine/7274628.html
3.
Agência Brasil. (2022, February22). Brazil calls for peaceful resolution of conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Agência Brasil. https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/en/internacional/noticia/2022-02/brazil-calls-peaceful-resolution-conflict-between-russia-and-ukraine
4.
AjilA. (2022). Politico-ideological violence: Zooming in on grievances. European Journal of Criminology, 19(2), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819896223
5.
AmmassariS. (2024, January12). Beyond grievances: The path to populist radical-right party membership. The Loop. https://theloop.ecpr.eu/beyond-grievances-the-path-to-populist-radical-right-party-membership/
6.
BakerJ. C. (2022, April20). Mexico’s face of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: Economic, political, and commercial consequences. Wilson Center. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/mexico-face-russias-invasion-ukraine-economic-political-and-commercial-consequences
7.
BallentineK., & ShermanJ. (Eds.). (2003). The political economy of armed conflict: Beyond greed and grievance. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
8.
BariievR. (2024). The Global South and the Russo-Ukrainian war: A strategic assessment. Rocznik Strategiczny, 29, 356–376. https://wnpism.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/17_RBariiev.pdf
9.
BarmanS. R. (2022, June3). Europe has to grow out of mindset that its problems are world’s problems: Jaishankar. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/europe-has-to-grow-out-of-mindset-that-its-problems-are-worlds-problems-jaishankar-7951895/
10.
Barnes-DaceyJ., & ShapiroJ. (2023, November20). The West should give up the battle of narratives with the Global South. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/11/20/west-global-south-narrative-rules-order/
11.
BhartiS. S., & NepalS. (2025). Comparing Indian and Western media reports on the ‘BRICS Summit 2024 and India’s Participation’. Asian Politics and Policy, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.70000
12.
BomprezziP., KharitinovI., & TrebeschC. (2024). Ukraine support tracker: Methodological update and new results on aid ‘allocation’. Kiel Institute for the World Economy. https://www.ifw-kiel.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/Subject_Dossiers_Topics/Ukraine/Ukraine_Support_Tracker/Ukraine_Support_Tracker_-_Research_Note.pdf
13.
BrosigM., & VermaR. (2024). The war in Ukraine, the Global South and the evolving global order. Global Policy, 15(4), 740–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13366
14.
CapelosT., SalmelaM., & KrisciunaiteG. (2022). Grievance politics: An empirical analysis of anger through the emotional mechanism of ressentiment. Politics and Governance, 10(4), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5789
15.
CassarC. (2023, March8). The legacy of colonialism today: Unequal power structures and lingering trauma. Anthropology Review. https://anthropologyreview.org/anthropology-glossary-of-terms/colonialism-acquiring-and-maintaining-control-over-another-country-or-territory/
16.
ChandraU. (2013). The case for a postcolonial approach to the study of politics. New Political Science, 35(3), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2013.813700
17.
ChivvisC. S., & Geaghan-BreinerB. (2024). Emerging powers and the future of American statecraft. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/04/emerging-powers-and-the-future-of-american-statecraft?lang=en
18.
CohenR. (2022, December31). Russia’s war could make it India’s world. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/31/world/asia/india-ukraine-russia.html
19.
CondonC. (2023, October10). Yellen resists pressure for reform of IMF voting shares. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-10-10/yellen-resists-pressure-for-reform-of-imf-voting-shares?embedded-checkout=true
20.
EichengreenB. (2018). The populist temptation: Economic grievance and political reaction in the modern era. Oxford University Press.
21.
FabriciusP. (2023, February3). Abstaining in absentia: Does SADC have a common position on Ukraine?ISS Africa. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/abstaining-in-absentia-does-sadc-have-a-common-position-on-ukraine
22.
FlindersM., & HinterleitnerM. (2022). Party politics vs. grievance politics: Competing modes of representative democracy. Society, 59(6), 672–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-022-00686-z
23.
FlintC. (2021). Introduction to geopolitics (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003138549
24.
GhilèsF. (2023). The Global South does not buy the Western stance on Ukraine. CIDOB (Barcelona Centre for International Affairs). https://www.cidob.org/publicaciones/global-south-does-not-buy-western-stance-ukraine
25.
GordonJ. (2023, June28). The brutal impact of sanctions on the Global South. Yale Journal of International Law. https://www.yjil.yale.edu/the-brutal-impact-of-sanctions-on-the-global-south/
26.
GowanR. (2023, March9). The Global South and the Ukraine War at the UN. Crisis Group. https://www.crisisgroup.org/global-ukraine/global-south-and-ukraine-war-un
27.
HarrisB., & LeahyJ. (2023, April15). Lula vows partnership with China to ‘balance world geopolitics’. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/766ed3aa-3f51-4035-8573-43254c9756d5
28.
The Hindu. (2025, February24). India abstains on UNGA resolution calling for de-escalation, peaceful resolution of Ukraine war. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/india-abstains-on-unga-resolution-calling-for-de-escalation-peaceful-resolution-of-ukraine-war/article69260943.ece
29.
HoganE., & PatrickS. (2024, May20). A closer look at the Global South. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/05/global-south-colonialism-imperialism?lang=en
30.
HolzscheiterA. (2014). Between communicative interaction and structures of signification: Discourse theory and analysis in international relations. International Studies Perspectives, 15(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12005
31.
HossainN., JoshiA., & PandeS. (2023). The politics of complaint: A review of the literature on grievance redress mechanisms in the global South. Policy Studies, 45(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2193387
32.
HossainS. (2022, December26). Third World or Global South? It’s time to redefine. South Asia Monitor. https://www.southasiamonitor.org/perspective/third-world-or-global-south-its-time-redefine
33.
HurrellA., & SenguptaS. (2012). Emerging powers, North–South relations and global climate politics. International Affairs, 88(3), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01084.x
34.
KeenD. (2000). Incentives and disincentives for violence. In BerdalM. R. & MaloneD. (Eds.), Greed and grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars (pp. 19–42). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
35.
KhylkoM., & KhylkoО. (2024). Navigating Global South’s ambivalent stance on Russia–Ukraine war. Evropský politický a právní diskurz, 11(4), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.46340/eppd.2024.11.4.1
36.
KlingebielS. (2023). Geopolitics, the Global South and development policy (IDOS Policy Brief No. 14/2023). German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS). https://doi.org/10.23661/ipb14.2023
37.
KriesiH., WangC., KurerT., & HäusermannS. (2020). Economic grievances, political grievances, and protest. In KriesiH., LorenziniJ., WüestB. & HausermannS. (Eds.), Contention in times of crisis: Recession and political protest in thirty European countries (pp. 149–183). Cambridge University Press.
38.
KurerT., HäusermannS., WüestB., & EnggistM. (2019). Economic grievances and political protest. European Journal of Political Research, 58(3), 866–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12318
39.
LeesN. (2021). The Brandt Line after forty years: The more North–South relations change, the more they stay the same?Review of International Studies, 47(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021052000039X
40.
LehoczkiB. (2023). Populist sovereigntism and international cooperation: The case of Brazil and Hungary. Contemporary Politics, 30(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2023.2267364
41.
McilhennyW. (2023, May2). Brazil: A voice for all? In Alliances in a shifting global order: Rethinking transatlantic engagement. German Marshall Fund. https://www.gmfus.org/news/alliances-shifting-global-order-rethinking-transatlantic-engagement-global-swing-states
42.
MercoPress. (2022, June28). Argentine president tells G7 dialogue was needed to solve Ukraine crisis. https://en.mercopress.com/2022/06/28/argentine-president-tells-g7-dialogue-was-needed-to-solve-ukraine-crisis
43.
MurshedS. M., & TadjoeddinM. Z. (2009). Revisiting the greed and grievance explanations for violent internal conflict. Journal of International Development, 21(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1478
44.
NairS. (2017). Introducing postcolonialism in international relations theory. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2017/12/08/postcolonialism-in-international-relations-theory/
45.
NugentC. (2022, May4). Lula talks to TIME about Ukraine, Bolsonaro, and Brazil’s fragile democracy. TIME. https://time.com/6173232/lula-da-silva-transcript
46.
PatrickS., & HugginsA. (2023, August15). The term ‘Global South’ is surging. It should be retired. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2023/08/the-term-global-south-is-surging-it-should-be-retired?lang=en
47.
PatrickS., MbeteS., SpektorM., GuihongZ., NovosseloffA., HeusgenC., MukherjeeR., LipscyP. Y., Ruiz Cabañas IzquierdoM., AdebajoA., KolosovskiyA., NgJ., SinghP., YinancB., GowanR., & DayalA. (2023, June28). UN Security Council reform: What the world thinks. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2023/06/28/un-security-council-reform-what-world-thinks-pub-90032
48.
RahmanH. (2023, September6). Anxiety, not ambition, behind rise of the Global South against US-led world order. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3233398/anxiety-not-ambition-behind-rise-global-south-against-us-led-world-order?module=perpetual_scroll_0&pgtype=article
49.
RaslanR. A. A. (2021). Transfer of technology: A North–South debate?Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 11(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2021.03.04
50.
RodkiewiczW. (2023, April7). An anti-colonial alliance with the Global South: The new foreign policy concept. OSW Commentary. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2023-04-07/anti-colonial-alliance-global-south-new-foreign-policy-concept
51.
RoussetN. (2022, November8). COP27: How responsible are industrialised countries for climate change?The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/cop27-how-responsible-are-industrialised-countries-for-climate-change-193965
52.
SadieY. (2023). The South African government’s stance on the Russia–Ukraine war as reflected in the South African newspaper media. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 9(4), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.9-4-2
53.
Sanz SabidoR. (2019). Postcolonial critical discourse analysis: Theory and method. In The Israeli–Palestinian conflict in the British press (pp. 19–53). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52646-5_2
54.
SebastianL. C., & PriamarizkiA. (2024). Indonesia’s Russia–Ukraine war stance and the Global South: Between solidarity and transactionalism. Global Policy, 15(4), 783–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13380
55.
SenS. (2023). Decolonising to reimagine international relations: An introduction. Review of International Studies, 49(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210523000177
56.
SeshadriC. (2023, November23). Western sanctions on Russia and the Global South’s stance. Royal United Services Institute. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/western-sanctions-russia-and-global-souths-stance?trk=public_post_comment-text
57.
StuenkelO. (2023, November2). Why the Global South is accusing America of hypocrisy. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/11/02/israel-palestine-hamas-gaza-war-russia-ukraine-occupation-west-hypocrisy
58.
StuenkelO. D. C. (2024). The New World Order and the Global South. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 40(2), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grae008
59.
TicknerA. B., & SmithK. (Eds.). (2020). International relations from the global south: Worlds of difference (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756233
60.
TellisA. J. (2022, April25). What is in our interest? India and the Ukraine war. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2022/04/what-is-in-our-interest-india-and-the-ukraine-war?lang=en
61.
ThalangC. N. (2023). Unpacking Thailand’s conceptions of and position within the liberal international order. International Affairs, 99(4), 1519–1536. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad168
62.
TurnerM. (2024). The Global South and the Russia–Ukraine war: Nonalignment and Western responses on the Cusp of a multipolar world. In Security in Context report: The Global South in an era of great power competition. Security in Context. https://www.securityincontext.org/posts/the-global-south-and-the-russia-ukraine-war-nonalignment-and-western-responses-on-cusp-of-multipolar-world
63.
UN News. (2012, September29). Africa must have due representation in Security Council, ministers tell UN debate. https://news.un.org/en/story/2012/09/422132
64.
United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2021, December1). The future of industrialization in a post-pandemic world: Industrial Development Report 2022. https://www.unido.org/news/future-industrialization-post-pandemic-world-industrial-development-report-2022
65.
WojnaB. (2022, April20). Within the world of ambiguities: Mexico’s stance on Russia’s war against Ukraine. Wilson Center. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/within-world-ambiguities-mexico-face-russias-war-against-ukraine
66.
YongL. (2021, May). Why industrial development matters now more than ever. Industrial Analytics Platform. https://iap.unido.org/articles/why-industrial-development-matters-now-more-ever
