The process of labour migrants’ destination selection is a multifaceted journey, intricately shaped by a myriad of interconnected factors. In the Indian context, competitive federalism has amplified the pull factors that attract migrants to new destinations. While Maharashtra, Delhi and Gujarat continue to attract large interstate migration, new corridors are emerging in traditionally less migrant-reliant regions. This study explores how destination location attributes influence migrant workers’ choices when they have multiple options for destination places. Using primary data from Surat in Gujarat and Kochi in Kerala, we offer a comparative analysis employing exploratory factor analysis and qualitative methods to examine key destination attributes. The findings reveal that Gujarat attracts migrants primarily for its abundant job opportunities and ease of employment, whereas Kerala attracts migrant labour with higher wages. These variations stem from the distinct demographics, economic structures and cultural contexts of Surat and Kochi.
AbbasR. (2016). Internal migration and citizenship in India. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(1), 150–168.
2.
AbbasR., & VarmaD. (2014). Internal labour migration in India raises integration challenges for migrants. Migration Information Source, 3. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/internal-labor-migration-india-raises-integration-challenges-migrants
3.
AggarwalV., & SinghS. (2020). Handbook of internal migration in India. Handbook of internal migration in India (1st ed., pp. 703–719). Sage Publications Pvt. Ltd.
4.
AhmedN. (2018). Mobile people, immobile structures: A study of internal migrants in India and access to social protection [Doctoral thesis, University of Sussex, PhD in Migration Studies, Department of Geography, University of Sussex].
5.
BhagatR. B. (2016). Internal migration in India: Are the underclass more mobile?India Migrations Reader (p. 122). Taylor & Francis.
6.
BhavnaniR. R., & LacinaB. (2018). Nativism and economic integration across the developing world: Collision and accommodation. Elements in political economy. Cambridge University Press.
7.
BloemraadI. (2013). The promise and pitfalls of comparative research design in the study of migration. Migration Studies, 1(1), 27–46.
8.
BorjasG. J. (1992). Ethnic capital and intergenerational mobility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), 123–150.
9.
BorjasG. J. (1999). Heaven’s door: Immigration policy and the American economy. Princeton University Press.
10.
BremanJ. (1996). Footloose Labour: Working in India’s Informal Economy (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
11.
BremanJ. (2015). Interview: A footloose scholar. New Left Review, 94. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii94/articles/jan-breman-a-footloose-scholar
12.
BremanJ. (2019). Capitalism, inequality, and labour in India (pp. 161–173). Cambridge University Press.
13.
BremanJ., & DasA. N. (2000). Down and out: Labouring under global capitalism. Amsterdam University Press.
14.
C. S., P. L., & NairS. B. (2017). Urbanization in Kerala—What does the census data reveal?Indian Journal of Human Development, 11(3), 356–386.
15.
CashinP., & SahayR. (1995). Internal migration, center–state grants and economic growth in the states of India [IMF working papers, 95(66)]. IMF.
16.
Census of India. (2011). Provisional population totals. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Retrieved from http://censusindia.gov.in
17.
ChackoP. (2018). The right turn in India: Authoritarianism, populism, and neoliberalisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1446546
18.
ChandrasekharS., & SharmaA. (2014). Internal migration for education and employment among youth in India. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
19.
ChathukulamJ., & TharamangalamJ. (2021). The Kerala model in the time of COVID-19: Rethinking state, society, and democracy. World Development, 137, 105207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105207
20.
DasB. (1997). Slum dwellers in Surat city: A socio-demographic profile. Indian Journal of Social Work, 58. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:74603139
21.
DasB., & SahuG. B. (2019). Coping with cities and connecting with villages: Migrant workers in Surat city. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 62, 89–112.
22.
DesaiK. (2020). Exploitation and liberation: Case study of women workers in Surat’s unorganised sector. Social Change, 50(1), 12–27.
23.
EngelshovenM. (1999). Diamonds and Patels: A report on the diamond industry of Surat. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 33(1–2), 353–377.
24.
FotheringhamA. S., ChampionT., WymerC., & CoombesM. (2000). Measuring destination attractivity: A migration example. International Journal of Population Geography, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1220(200011/12)6:63.3.CO;2-X
25.
GaikwadN., & NellisG. (2017). The majority–minority divide in attitudes toward internal migration: Evidence from Mumbai. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 456–472.
26.
GeisW., UebelmesserS & WerdingM. (2008). How do migrants choose their destination country?: An analysis of institutional determinants [CESifo Working Paper, No. 2506, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo, Institute (CESifo)].
27.
Government of India (GoI). (2017a). India on the move and churning: New evidence. Economic Survey of India 2016–17 (pp. 264–284). Ministry of Finance Department of Economic Affairs Economic Division, Government of India. https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget2017-2018/es2016-17/echap12.pdf
28.
Government of India (GoI). (2017b). From competitive federalism to competitive sub-federalism: Cities as dynamos. Economic Survey of India 2016–17 (pp. 300–319). Ministry of Finance Department of Economic Affairs Economic Division, Government of India. https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget2017-2018/es2016-17/echap14.pdf
29.
Government of India (GoI). (2017c). Report of the working group on migration. Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, Government of India. https://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/1566.pdf
30.
GreeneJ. C., & CaracelliV. J. (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/advancesinmixedm0000unse_q7w2.
31.
GreenwoodM. J. (1971). An analysis of the determinants of internal labour mobility in India. The Annals of Regional Science, 5(1), 137–151.
32.
HattieJ. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing uni-dimensionality of tests and ltenls. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139–164.
33.
HirwayI., & ShahN. (2011). Labour and employment under globalisation: The case of Gujarat. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(22), 57–65.
34.
HirwayI., SinghU. B., & SharmaR. (2014). Migration and development study of rural to urban temporary migration to Gujarat. Centre for Development Alternatives.
35.
HuY., & RitchieJ. (1993). Measuring Destination attractiveness: A contextual approach. Journal of Travel Research, 32(2), 25–34.
36.
JainP., & SharmaA. (2019). Super-exploitation of Adivasi migrant workers: The political economy of migration from southern Rajasthan to Gujarat. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 31(1), 63–99.
37.
JayaramN., & VarmaD. (2020). Examining the ‘labour’ in labour migration: migrant workers’ informal work arrangements and access to labour rights in urban sectors. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63(4), 999–1019.
38.
JolliffeI. T. (1972). Discarding variables in a principal component analysis. I: Artificial data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics), 21(2), 160–173.
39.
KallungalD. (2021). 55.6% of migrant workers in Kerala have major diseases: Study. The New Indian Express. Retrieved July19, 2024, from. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2021/Sep/02/556-migrant-workers-in-kerala-have-major-diseases-study-2353043.html
40.
KannanK. P. (2015a). Political economy of labour and development in Kerala. Economic & Political Weekly, 33(52), 7–8.
41.
KannanK. P. (2015b). Growth without inclusion: The Gujarat ‘model’ for India’s development exposed. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 58(4), 653–676.
42.
KannanK. P. (2018). Wage inequalities in India [Working paper 482, Centre for Development Studies]. https://14.139.171.199:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/487
43.
KantorP., RaniU., & UnniJ. (2006). Decent work deficits in informal economy: Case of Surat. Economic & Political Weekly, 41(21), 2089–2097.
44.
KoneZ. L., LiuM. Y., MattooA., OzdenC., & SharmaS. (2018). Internal borders and migration in India. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(4), 729–759.
45.
KumarN. A. (2014). Interstate unskilled migrants of Kerala, South India: The push and pull factors of long distance migration within a country. Semantic Scholar.
46.
LaiY., ShibuyaK., & FongE. (2022). The intention to migrate from more developed to less developed areas: Evidence from Hong Kong. Asian Population Studies, 18(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2022.2087933
47.
LeeE. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063
48.
MalhotraN., & DeviP. (2016). Analysis of factors affecting internal migration in India. Amity Journal of Economics, 1(2), 34–51.
49.
MaydaA. M. (2007, May). International migration: A panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateral flows [Working/Discussion Paper No. 07/07, Discussion Paper Series 07/07, Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration].
50.
MunshiK., & RosenzweigM. (2016). Networks and misallocation: Insurance, migration, and the rural-urban wage gap. American Economic Review, 106(1), 46–98.
51.
NagM, PeterB., & VermaD. (2023). Surat or Kerala: Exploring caste dynamics in labour migration across two key interstate labour migration corridors from Odisha’s Ganjam district. Odisha Economic Journal, 55(1), 113–130.
52.
NarayanaD., VenkiteswaranC. S., & JosephM. P. (2013). Domestic migrant labour in Kerala. Gulati Institute of Finance and Taxation.
53.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
54.
PapolaT. S., & KannanK. P. (2017). Towards an India wage report (No. 994971390602676). International Labour Organization.
55.
ParidaJ. K., & RamanK. R. (2021). A study on in-migration, informal employment and urbanization in Kerala. https://spb.kerala.gov.in/sites/default/files/inline-files/In-migrationEmploymnt.pdf
56.
ParidaJ. K., JohnM. E., & SunnyJ. (2020). Construction labour migrants and wage inequality in Kerala. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 22(2), 414–442.
57.
ParwezS. (2016). A comparative study of Gujarat and Kerala developmental experiences. International Journal of Rural Management, 12(2), 104–124.
58.
PatelH. C., MoitraM., & KanthariaS. L. (2012). Working conditions of male construction worker and its impact on their life: A cross sectional study in Surat city. National Journal of Community Medicine, 3(04), 652–656.
PeterB., & NarendranV. (2017). God’s own workforce: Unravelling labour migration to Kerala. Perumbavoor: Centre for Migration and Inclusive Development. https://cmid.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Gods-Own-Workforce-CMID-Web.pdf
61.
Prasad-AleyammaM. (2018). Cards and carriers: Migration, identification and surveillance in Kerala, South India. Contemporary South Asia, 26(2), 191–205.
62.
RajanS. I., PeterB., MishraU. S., & NarendranV. (2018). Impact of demographic transition in Kerala on migration and labour force. India migration report 2019. Routledge India.
63.
RejaM. S., & DasB. (2019). Labour migration within India: Motivations and social networks. South Asia Research, 39(2), 125–142.
64.
SahuG. B., & DasB. (2008). Income remittances and urban labour markets: Oriya migrant workers in Surat city. Adhikar.
65.
ShaikhZ. (2016). Every 3rd Indian migrant, most headed south. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/tamil-nadu-kerala-daily-wages-migrant-population-4410694/2748
66.
SinghD. P. (2007). Migration in Mumbai: Trends in fifty years. Demography India, 36(2), 315–327.
67.
SolankiA., & ZankhariaK. (2015). Migrant construction workers in the unorganized sector of Surat city—A socio-economic analysis. Semantic Scholar. https://eprajournals.com/IJES/article/9221/abstract
68.
SrivastavaR. (2020). Integrating migration and development policy in India: A case study of three Indian states. WP, 3, 10–18.
69.
SrivastavaR., & PandeyA. K. (2017). Internal and international migration in South Asia: drivers, interlinkage and policy issues. https://www.unescogym.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/06/Internal-and-International-Migration-in-South-Asia.pdf
70.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
71.
ThomasJ., & JayeshM. (2019). Labour market in Kerala: Examining the role of industrial and employment policies. Globalization, labour market institutions, processes and policies in India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7111-0_19
72.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural, Organization (UNESCO). (2013). Social inclusion of internal migrants in India, UNESCO.
73.
ZachariahK. C., & RajanS. I. (2005). Unemployment in Kerala at the turn of the century: Insights from CDS gulf migration studies. https://14.139.171.199:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/272
74.
ZachariahK. C., & RajanS. I. (2020). Economic and social dynamics of migration in Kerala, 1998—2003: Analysis of panel data. Dynamics of Indian migration (pp. 361–377). Routledge India.
75.
ZavodnyM. (1997). Welfare and the locational choices of new immigrants. Economic review—Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (pp. 2–10). Economist Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
