Gender discrimination has been an important socio-economic and cultural issue in Indian backdrop; though India is one of the fastest-growing nations in the world but she has ranked 108th (out of 144 countries) in 2016 on the global gender gap index. In order to explore the determinants of crimes (such as dowry death, rape, molestation and torture) in India, we consider 24 states and five time points (over 1995–2015). Rank correlation over time clearly suggests that states exhibiting higher incidence of molestation experience higher incidence of rape; we get similar results in case of torture and dowry death as well. We employ both global and local Moran’s indices for dowry death, which has the least reporting bias, and observe that space as well as neighbourhood effect does matter; on the contrary, we find that other types of crimes vary randomly. Specifically, spatial panel regression results on dowry death clearly show that space along with neighbourhood effect does matter towards variations of dowry death; only two variables namely female work force participation and police station significantly reduce the incidence of dowry death.
AdeyemiR., MayakiJ., ZewotirT., & RamroopS. (2021). Demography and crime: A spatial analysis of geographical patterns and risk factors of crimes in Nigeria. Spatial Statistics, 41, 100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100485
2.
AgarwalB., & PandaP. (2007). Toward freedom from domestic violence: The neglected obvious. Journal of Human Development, 8(3), 359–388.
3.
AlshbolA. (2011). Types and geographical patterns of crime: Anthropological study of some of the crimes committed in Jordan. Journal of the Social Sciences, 39, 37–81.
4.
AmaralS. (2017). Do improved property rights decrease violence against women in India? SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2504579 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2504579
5.
AmaralS., BhalotraS., & PrakashN. (2019). The Institute for Economic Development Working Papers Series dp-309, Boston University, Department of Economics.
6.
AndersonJ., & KrasK. (2007). Revisiting Albert Bandura’s social learning theory to better understand and assist victims of intimate personal violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 17, 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v17n01_05
7.
AnnamalaiE. (2006). India: Language situation. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04611-3
8.
AnselinL. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9.
AnselinL. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.
10.
AnselinL., & BeraA. K. (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In UllahA. & GilesD. E. A. (Eds.), Handbook of applied economics statistics. Marcel Dekker.
11.
AnselinL., GalloJ. L., & JayetH. (2008). Spatial panel econometrics. In MátyásL. & SevestreP. (Eds.), The econometrics of panel data. Advanced studies in theoretical and applied econometrics (Vol. 46). Springer.
12.
BabuB. V., & KarS. K. (2009). Domestic violence against women in eastern India: A population-based study on prevalence and related issues. BMC Public Health, 9, 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-129
13.
BaltagiB. H., & GriffinJ. M. (1997). Pooled estimators vs. their heterogeneous counterparts in the context of dynamic demand for gasoline. Journal of Econometrics, 77, 303–27.
14.
BaltagiB. H., & PirotteA. (2010). Panel data inference under spatial dependence. Economic Modelling, 27, 1368–1381.
15.
BarkerG., ContrerasM., HeilmanB., SinghA., VermaR., & NascimentoM. (2011). Initial results from the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2218.8646
16.
BasileK., HallJ., & WaltersM. (2013). Expanding resource theory and feminist-informed theory to explain intimate partner violence perpetration by court-ordered men. Violence Against Women, 19, 848–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213497105
17.
BhattacharjeeJ., & HaldarS. K. (2015). Economic growth of selected South Asian countries: Does institution matter?Asian Economic and Financial Review, 5(2), 356–70.
18.
BhattacharyaP. C., & SaxenaV. (2015). Socio-economic determinants of child and juvenile sex ratios in India: A longitudinal analysis with district-level data. Heriot-Watt University Economics Discussion Papers 1503, Department of Economics, School of Management and Languages, Heriot Watt University. https://ideas.repec.org/p/hwe/hwuedp/1503.html
19.
BhattacharyyaA., & HaldarS. K. (2020a). Socio-economic development and child sex ratio in India: Revisiting the debate using spatial panel data regression. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 22, 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-019-00089-7
20.
BhattacharyyaA., & HaldarS. K. (2020b). Does U feminisation work in female labour force participation rate? India: A case study. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63, 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-019-00202-8
21.
BohraN., SharmaI., SrivastavaS., BhatiaM., ChaudhuriU., & ParialS. (2015). Violence against women. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 57 (Suppl 2). S333–S338. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.161500
22.
CeccatoV. (2008). Crime and space. Ymer. 191–208.
23.
CerioliA., & RianiM. (1999). The ordering of spatial data and the detection of multiple outliers. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1999.10474812
24.
Clots-FiguerasI. (2011). Women in politics: Evidence from the Indian states. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 664–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.017
25.
CuiZ., & HazraD. (2017). Macroeconomic determinants of crime: Evidence from India. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3005019
26.
DahlbergL. L., & KrugE. G. (2002). Violence: A global public health problem. In KrugE. G., DahlbergL. L., MercyJ. A., ZwiA. B., & LozanoR. (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 1–21). World Health Organization.
27.
DalmiaS., & LawrenceP. (2005). The institution of dowry in India: Why it continues to prevail. The Journal of Developing Areas, 38, 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2005.0018
28.
DangG., KulkarniV. S., & GaihaR. (2017). What factors can explain the rise and inter-state variation in crimes against women in India?Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 152017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
29.
Das GuptaM. (2019). Is banning sex-selection the best approach for reducing prenatal discrimination?https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2019.1671015
30.
DesaiS. (1994). Gender inequalities and demographic behaviour, India. The Population Council.
31.
EdwardsA. (2017). Violence against women as sex discrimination: Judging the jurisprudence of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Equality and Non-Discrimination Under International Law.
32.
ElhorstJ. P. (2010). Spatial panel data models. In FischerM. & GetisA. (Eds.), Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer.
33.
ElhorstJ. P. (2012). Dynamic spatial panels: Models, methods and inferences. Journal of Geographical Systems, 14, 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-011-0158-4
34.
GannonT., CollieR., WardT., & ThakkerJ. (2008). Rape: Psychopathology, theory and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 982–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.005
35.
GhooiR., & DeshpandeS. (2013). Violence against women in India: A case for research in tackling the menace. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2272617
36.
GoodeW. (1971). Force and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 33(4), 624–636. https://doi.org/10.2307/349435
37.
HazraD., & CuiZ. (2018). Macroeconomic determinants of crime: Evidence from India. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-018-0127-6
38.
HimabinduB. L., AroraR., & PrashanthN. S. (2014). Whose problem is it anyway? Crimes against women in India. Global Health Action, 7, 23718. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23718
39.
IyerL., ManiA., MishraP., & TopalovaP. (2012). The power of political voice: Women’s political representation and crime in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(4), 165–93. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.4.165
40.
JeyaseelanV., KumarS., JeyaseelanL., ShankarV., YadavB. K., & BangdiwalaS. I. (2015). Dowry demand and harassment: Prevalence and risk factors in India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 47(6), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932014000571
41.
JiangW. (2000). The relationship between culture and language. Elt Journal, 54. https://10.1093/elt/54.4.328
42.
JinL., DaiX., ShiA., & ShiL. (2015). Detection of outliers in mixed regressive—Spatial autoregressive models. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 45. https://10.1080/03610926.2014.941493
43.
KelejianH., PruchaI., & YuzefovichY. (2006). Estimation problems in models with spatial weighting matrices which have blocks of equal elements. Journal of Regional Science, 46, 507–515. https://10.1111/j.1467-9787.2006.00449.x
KulkarniP. M. (2007). Estimation of missing girls at birth and child ages in India. UNPFA. https://www.unfpa.org/gender/case_studies.htm
46.
LeSageJ. P., & PaceR. K. (2010). Spatial econometric models. In FischerM. & GetisA. (Eds.), Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer.
47.
LiH., CalderC., & CressieN. (2007). Beyond Moran’s I: Testing for spatial dependence based on the spatial autoregressive model. Geographical Analysis, 39, 357–375. https://10.1111/j.1538-4632.2007.00708.x
48.
LinT.-C., & AdseraA. (2013). Son preference and children’s housework: The case of India. Population Research and Policy Review, 32, 553–584. https://10.1007/s11113-013-9269-6
49.
MastutiW., DjuraidahA., & ErfianiE. (2019). Robust spatial regression model on original local government revenue in Java 2017. Indonesian Journal of Statistics and Its Applications, 4. https://10.29244/ijsa.v4i1.573
50.
MishraP. K., MishraS., & SarangiM. (2020). Do women’s advancement and gender parity promote economic growth? Evidence from 30 Asian countries. Millennial Asia, 11. https://10.1177/0976399619900603
51.
North Eastern Council (2008). Region and North Eastern Council, NER Vision 2020, North Eastern region Vision, Ministry of Development of NER and NEC, Govt. of India. Retrieved January4, 2019, from http://necouncil.gov.in/about-us/nec-vision-2020-0
52.
NyeF. I. (1979). Choice, exchange, and the family. In BurrW. R., HillR., NyeF. I., & ReissI. L. (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol 2, pp. 1–41). Free Press.
53.
PakM., GulciS., & OkumuşA. (2018). A study on the use and modeling of geographical information system for combating forest crimes: An assessment of crimes in the eastern Mediterranean forests. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6445-x
54.
PowersR., CochranJ., MaskalyJ., & SellersC. (2017). Social learning theory, gender, and intimate partner violent victimization: A structural equations approach. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35. https://10.1177/0886260517710486
55.
PrasadB. (1994). Dowry-related violence: A content analysis of news in selected newspapers. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 25(1), 71–89. Retrieved July2, 2020, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41602309
56.
PrescottS., & LetkoC. (1977). Battered women: A social psychological perspective. In RoyM. (Ed.), Battered women (pp. 72–96). Van Nostrand.
57.
RamA., VictorC. P., ChristyH., HembromS., CherianA. G., & MohanV. R. (2019). Domestic violence and its determinants among 15–49-year-old women in a rural block in south India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 44(4), 362–367. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_84_19
58.
RashadA., & SharafM. (2017). Income inequality and violence against women: Evidence from India, Working Papers 2017-13, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
59.
RigerS., & KrieglsteinM. (2000). The impact of welfare reform on men’s violence against women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005193603532
60.
RobitailleM.-C. (2013). Determinants of stated son preference in India: Are men and women different?Journal of Development Studies, 49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.682986
61.
RoyD. (2018). From non-places to places: Transforming partition rehabilitation camps through the gendered quotidian. Millennial Asia, 9, 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399617753752
62.
SarangiA. (2006). Ambedkar and the linguistic states: A case for Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 151–157. https://doi.org/10.2307/4417674
63.
SenA. (1990). More than 100 million women are missing. In The New York review of books (Vol 37). https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1990/12/20/more-than-100-million-women-are-missing/
64.
SenA. (2015). The country of first boys and other essays. Oxford University Press.
65.
TynerJ. (2012). Space, place, and violence: Violence and the embodied geographies of race, sex, and gender (pp. 1–226). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802120
66.
United Nations (2015). The world’s women 2015, trends and statistics. United Nations Economic and Social Affairs.
67.
VicenteG., GoicoaT., Fernandez-RasinesP., & UgarteM. (2019). Crime against women in India: Unveiling spatial patterns and temporal trends of dowry deaths in the districts of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12545
68.
YodanisC. (2004). Gender inequality, violence against women, and fear: A cross-national test of the feminist theory of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 655–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504263868
