Settlements in the Civil Wars of Myanmar and Sri Lanka: The Success,Failure and Deception of the Peace Process

Abstract

The civil wars in Myanmar and Sri Lanka were both long-lasting ethnic conflicts. While the government of Myanmar is still fighting with several ethnic armed groups, a series of ceasefires were reached with around 25 armed groups during 1989–2009, and more after 2011. Sri Lanka also went through a period of seemingly successful peace process during 2002–2003 when the government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) agreed to a permanent ceasefire under Norway’s mediation. However, the peace agreement soon failed and the military defeated the Tamils in 2009. Although the two wars had different outcomes—one in relatively successful ceasefires and the other in a military victory, the minorities in both countries are still under the dominance and oppression of the federal government. This paper tries to account for the difference in the settlements of the two wars as well as for the reasons why more durable peace could not be achieved in both cases. It argues that the Myanmar government used the ceasefires as its tool for state consolidation while showing no genuine commitment to a political solution. On the other hand, the Sri Lankan peace process failed because the two parties had completely different visions for a political settlement. Thus, for a peace process to be truly successful, both sides must come to an agreement on a political solution through power-sharing.

Keywords

Settlement of ethnic conflict peace process state power Sri Lanka Myanmar

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burma News International. (2015). Achieving peace through ceasefires. BNI Analysis Paper 1: Burma News International Peace Monitoring team. Retrieved 2 May 2015, from http://mmpeacemonitor.org/research/reports

Callahan

M. P.

(2007). Political authority in Burma’s ethnic minority states: Devolution, occupation and coexistence. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Cunningham

D. E.

, Gleditsch

K. S.

, & Salehyan

(2009). It takes two: A dyadic analysis of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 570–597.

Fearon

J. D.

(2004). Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others? Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 275–301.

Goodhand

, & Korf

(2011). Caught in the peace trap? In Goodhand

, Spencer

& Korf

(Eds.), Conflict and peacebuilding in Sri Lanka: Caught in the peace trap? (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Routledge.

Hartzell

, Hoddie

, & Rothchild

(2001). Stabilizing the peace after civil war: An investigation of some key variables. International Organization, 55(01), 183–208.

Hartzell

C. A.

, & Hoddie

(2007). Crafting peace: Power-sharing institutions and the negotiated settlement of civil wars. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Holt

(2011). Aid, peacebuilding and the resurgence of war: Buying time in Sri Lanka. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mattes

, & Savun

(2010). Information, agreement design, and the durability of civil war settlements. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 511–524.

10.

Nadarajah

, & Vimalarajah

(2008). The politics of transformation: The LTTE and the 2002–2006 peace process in Sri Lanka (Berghof Transitions Series No. 4). Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.

11.

, & Min

(2007). Assessing Burma’s ceasefire accords. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

12.

Raw

(2001). Views from Myanmar: An ethnic minority perspective. In Taylor

R. H.

(Ed.), Burma: Political economy under military rule (pp. 159–163). London: C. Hurst & Co.

13.

Schiff

(2014). On success and failure: Readiness theory and the Aceh and Sri Lanka peace processes. International Negotiation (Hague, Netherlands), 19(1), 89–126.

14.

Smith

(2011). The military dynamics of the peace process and its aftermath. In Goodhand

, Spencer

& Korf

(Eds.), Conflict and peacebuilding in Sri Lanka: caught in the peace trap? (pp. 74–91). New York: Routledge.

15.

South

(2008). Ethnic politics in Burma: States of conflict. New York: Routledge.

16.

Steinberg

D. I.

(2007). Legitimacy in Burma/Myanmar: Concepts and implications. In Ganesan

& Hlaing

K. Y.

(Eds.), Myanmar: State, society and ethnicity (pp. 109–142). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

17.

Stokke

(2006). Building the Tamil Eelam State: Emerging state institutions and forms of governance in LTTE-controlled areas in Sri Lanka. Third World Quarterly, 27(6), 1021–1040.

18.

Uyangoda

(2011). Government–LTTE peace negotiations in 2002–2005 and the clash of state formation projects. In Goodhand

, Spencer

& Korf

(Eds.), Conflict and peacebuilding in Sri Lanka: Caught in the peace trap? (pp. 16–38). New York: Routledge.

19.

Walter

B. F.

(1997). The critical barrier to civil war settlement. International Organization, 51(3), 335–364.

20.

Zartman

I. W.

(2000). Ripeness: The hurting stalemate and beyond. In National Research Council (Ed.), International conflict resolution after the Cold War (pp. 225–250). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.