The global annual waste generated every year is more than two billion tonnes (Statista, 2025), and when this waste is disposed of in landfills, it adversely affects many people’s lives. Recycling can not only reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills, but reusing resources is also good for the environment (Biswas et al., 2021, Waste-Wise Cities: Best Practices in Municipal Solid Waste Management). While recycling has been around for some time, there is scant research on whether Gen Z’s recycling behaviour, in particular, has become a habit and is therefore here to stay or not. The global pandemic caused by COVID-19 provides an apt backdrop to evaluate whether or not recycling has become a way of life for Gen Z. This study is based on a survey conducted through a questionnaire that was administered to undergraduate students. With the onset of COVID-19, more effort is being spent on understanding the importance of public health and how one person’s well-being affects another person in a neighbourhood. Gen Zs, who arguably constitute a significant group of decision-makers that will affect the future of recycling, will determine the success of future recycling endeavours. Therefore, understanding the decision-making of this group will help in advancing research that specifically studies how a nation’s sustainability agenda can be strengthened.
AboelmagedM. (2021). E-waste recycling behaviour: An integration of recycling habits into the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 124182.
2.
Aguilar-LuzónM. D., Garcia-MartinezJ. M. A., Calvo-SalgueroA., & SalinasJ. M. (2012). Comparative study between the theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm model regarding the environment, on Spanish housewives’ recycling behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2797–2833.
3.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
4.
AjzenI. (1996). The directive influence of attitudes on behavior. In GollwitzerP. M. & BarghJ. A. (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 385–403). The Guilford Press.
5.
AlokP. K. (2020, June20). Lawless lawmaking in a COVID-19 world. Economic & Political Weekly, 55(25).
6.
ÅstrømA., & RiseJ. (2001). Socio-economic differences in patterns of health and oral health behaviour in 25-year-old Norwegians. Clinical Oral Investigations, 5, 122–128.
7.
BambergS., AjzenI., & SchmidtP. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 175–187.
8.
BiswasA., ParidaS., ChaudharyK., SinghR., TewariS., & SinghS. (2021). Waste-Wise Cities: Best Practices in Municipal Solid Waste Management. Centre for Science and Environment and NITI Aayog.
9.
BoulayA., RobinsonG. M., BarrS., ShawG., & MetcalfeA. (2020). Exploring household dynamics for recycling in the United Kingdom: A case study of recycling habits in Greater London. In TudorT. & DutraC. J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of waste, resources and the circular economy (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346347
10.
BrownR. J., CondorS., MathewsA., WadeG., & WilliamsJ. A. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organisation. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273–286.
11.
Bureau of International Recycling. (2020, May4). COVID-19: Update by BIR member national associations—The world moves tentatively into reopening phase. Retrieved, 3April2024, from https://www.bir.org/en/news-press/news/1000000228-covid-19-update-by-bir-member-national-associations-the-world-moves-tentatively-into-reopening-phase
12.
CharngH. W., PiliavinJ. A., & CalleroP. L. (1988). Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(4), 303–317.
13.
ChoM. (2019). Campus sustainability: An integrated model of college students’ recycling behavior on campus. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(6), 1042–1060.
14.
CornerA., MarkowitzE., & PidgeonN. (2014). Public engagement with climate change: The role of human values. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(3), 411–422.
ErscheK. D., LimT. V., WardL. H., RobbinsT. W., & StochlJ. (2017). Creature of habit: A self-report measure of habitual routines and automatic tendencies in everyday life. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 73–85.
17.
Erudera. (2023). Canada International Student Statistics. Retrieved, 30March2025, from https://erudera.com/statistics/canada/canada-international-student-statistics/
18.
EversN. F. G., GreenfieldP. M., & EversG. W. (2021). COVID-19 shifts mortality salience, activities, and values in the United States: Big data analysis of online adaptation. Human Behavior & Emerging Technologies, 3, 107–126.
19.
FarrellA. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324–327.
20.
Federation of Canadian Municipalities. (n.d.). Six sustainability ideas that have gone mainstream in Canada. Green Municipal Fund. Retrieved, 30March2025, from https://fcm.ca/en/resources/gmf/six-sustainability-ideas-have-gone-mainstream-in-canada-article-series
21.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
22.
GeigerJ. L., StegL., van der WerffE., & ÜnalA. B. (2019). A meta-analysis of factors related to recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 64, 78–97.
23.
GreenfieldP. M., BrownG., & DuH. (2021). Shifts in ecology, behavior, values, and relationships during the coronavirus pandemic: Survival threat, subsistence activities, conservation of resources, and interdependent families. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 2, 100017.
24.
GuadagnoliE., & VelicerW. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265.
25.
HairJ. F., HowardC. M., & NitzlC. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110.
26.
HoE. (2018). Exploring the social dimensions of multi-residential recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 77–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.027
27.
HoggM. A., Cooper-ShawL., & HolzworthD. W. (1993). Group prototypicality and depersonalized attraction in small interactive groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 452–465.
28.
ICEF Monitor. (2024, January24). Canada hosted more than 1 million international students in 2023. ICEF. Retrieved, 30March2025, from https://monitor.icef.com/2024/01/canada-hosted-more-than-1-million-international-students-in-2023/
29.
IrfanM., ZhaoZ. Y., RehmanA., OzturkI., & LiH. (2021). Consumers’ intention-based influence factors of renewable energy adoption in Pakistan: A structural equation modeling approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 432–445.
30.
JabeenG., YanQ., AhmadM., FatimaN., & QamarS. (2019). Consumers’ intention-based influence factors of renewable power generation technology utilization: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117737.
31.
Kapur-BakshiS., KaurM., & GautamS. (2021). Circular economy for plastics in India: A roadmap. The Energy and Resources Institute.
32.
KazaS., YaoL., Bhada-TataP., Van WoerdenF., & IonkovaK. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Group.
33.
KeizerK., & SchultzP. W. (2018). Social norms and pro-environmental behaviour. InEnvironmental psychology: An introduction (pp. 179–188). Wiley.
34.
KhanF., AhmedW., & NajmiA. (2019). Understanding consumers’ behavior intentions towards dealing with plastic waste: Perspective of a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 142, 49–58.
35.
KianpourK., JusohA., MardaniA., StreimikieneD., CavallaroF., Md. NorK., & ZavadskasE. K. (2017). Factors influencing consumers’ intention to return end-of-life electronic products through reverse supply chain management for reuse, repair and recycling. Sustainability, 9(9), 1657.
36.
LoureiroS. M. C., & KaufmannH. R. (2016). Committing millennials toward recycling and environmental preservation. Journal of Promotion Management, 22(2), 224–237.
37.
MaJ., YinZ., HipelK. W., & LiM. (2023). Exploring factors influencing the application accuracy of the theory of planned behavior in explaining recycling behavior. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(3), 445–470.
38.
MannettiL., PierroA., & LiviS. (2004). Recycling: Planned and self-expressive behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 227–236.
39.
MohantyS., & DilipkumarB. (2021, April24). Millennials wear innovator hat in combating Covid-19. The Economic Times. Retrieved, 30March2025, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/millennials-wear-innovator-hat-in-combating-covid-19/articleshow/82225868.cms
40.
NiauraA. (2013). Using the theory of planned behavior to investigate the determinants of environmental behavior among youth. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 63(1), 74–81.
41.
NigburD., LyonsE., & UzzellD. (2010). Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 259–284.
42.
OfstadS., TobolovaM., NayumA., & KlöcknerC. (2017). Understanding the mechanisms behind changing people’s recycling behavior at work by applying a comprehensive action determination model. Sustainability, 9(2), 204.
43.
ParzonkoA. J., BalińskaA., & SieczkoA. (2021). Pro-environmental behaviors of Generation Z in the context of the concept of homo socio-economicus. Energies, 14(6), 1597.
44.
PratapV., DayashankarM., & BijuS. (2020). Role of psychosocial factors in effective design of solid waste management programmes: Evidence from India. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 11(2), 266–280.
45.
RajaeeM., HoseiniS. M., & MalekmohammadiI. (2019). Proposing a socio-psychological model for adopting green building technologies: A case study from Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 45, 657–668.
46.
RajanS. I. (2020). COVID-19-led migrant crisis: A critique of policies. Economic & Political Weekly, 55(48), 13–16.
47.
RajanS. I., & CherianA. P. (2021). COVID-19: Urban vulnerability and the need for transformations. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 12(2), 310–322.
48.
RussellS. V., YoungC. W., UnsworthK. L., & RobinsonC. (2017). Bringing habits and emotions into food waste behaviour. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 125, 107–114.
49.
SantanaF. N., FischerS. L., JaegerM. O., & Wong-ParodiG. (2020). Responding to simultaneous crises: Communications and social norms of mask behavior during wildfires and COVID-19. Environmental Research Letters, 15, 111002.
50.
SchoemanD. C., & RampediI. T. (2022). Drivers of household recycling behavior in the city of Johannesburg, South Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 6229.
51.
SharmaH. B., VanapalliK. R., CheelaV. R. S., RanjanV. P., JaglanA. K., DubeyB., GoelS., & BhattacharyaJ. (2020). Challenges, opportunities, and innovations for effective solid waste management during and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105052.
52.
SortheixF. M., ParkerP. D., LechnerC. M., & SchwartzS. H. (2019). Changes in young Europeans’ values during the global financial crisis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(1), 15–25.
53.
SparksP., & ShepherdR. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with “green” consumerism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388–399.
54.
Statista. (2025, March27). Global waste generation - statistics & facts. Statista. Retrieved, 30March2025, from https://www.statista.com/topics/4983/waste-generation-worldwide/
55.
Statistics Canada. (2024, January22). Is the recent spike in international students affecting domestic university enrolment at Canadian public postsecondary institutions?StatsCAN Plus. Retrieved, 30March2025, from https://www.statcan.gc.ca/o1/en/plus/5435-recent-spike-international-students-affecting-domestic-university-enrolment-canadian
56.
StegL., de GrootJ., DreijerinkL., AbrahamseW., & SieroF. (2011). General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Society & Natural Resources, 24(4), 349–367.
57.
StrykerS. (1968). Identity salience and role performance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30(4), 558–564.
58.
StrykerS., & BurkeP. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.
59.
SyedQ., SopwithW., ReganM., & BellisM. A. (2003). Behind the mask: Journey through an epidemic—Some observations of contrasting public health responses to SARS. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(11), 855–856.
60.
TerryD. J., HoggM. A., & WhiteK. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social self-identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 225–244.
61.
UsherA. (2023, September27). A brief look at international students in Canada, part 2. Higher Education Strategy Associates. Retrieved, 30March2025, from https://higheredstrategy.com/a-brief-look-at-international-students-in-canada-part-2/
62.
VerplankenB., & AartsH. (1999). Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: Is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity?European Review of Social Psychology, 10(1), 101–134.
63.
WalshF. (2020). Loss and resilience in the time of COVID-19: Meaning making, hope, and transcendence. Family Process, 59, 898–911.
64.
WhitmarshL. (2008). Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research, 11(3), 351–374.
65.
WoodW., & RüngerD. (2016). Psychology of habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 289–314.
66.
YanG., PengY., HaoY., IrfanM., & WuH. (2021). Household head’s educational level and household education expenditure in China: The mediating effect of social class identification. International Journal of Educational Development, 83, 102400.
67.
ZhangJ., & MuQ. (2018). Air pollution and defensive expenditures: Evidence from particulate-filtering facemasks. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92(C), 517–536.
68.
ZhangY., WuS., & RasheedM. I. (2020). Conscientiousness and smartphone recycling intention: The moderating effect of risk perception. Waste Management, 101, 116–125.
