An urbanizing country such as India has its own development challenges given the conditions of dystopias and discontent in the urban areas. In addition, three global agendas, namely the New Urban Agenda, Sustainable Development Goals and the Nationally Determined Contributions towards climate change mitigation also demand actions in the cities. The traditional urban planning approach, based on master/development planning, and stemming from it, urban planning education, is highly technocratic and unable to deal with the reality of development challenges. In addition, urban planning education in India suffers from over-regulation and standardization, which leaves educational institutions devoid of innovation. Thus, for urban planning education to be relevant in India there is a need to revise and broaden the scope of the urban planning profession, non-standardize its contents, pay attention to substantive aspects including issues of equity and sustainability, have a future-facing approach towards dealing with climate change and rethink its pedagogic methods. However, for these changes to occur, urban planning educational institutes must take the lead and initiate radical reforms in country’s higher education regulatory system.
AICTE (2012). Model curriculum for M. Plan/M. Tech (Planning). Government of India. http://old.aicte-india.org/downloads/Master_planning_101212.pdf
2.
AranyaR., & VaidyaC. (2016). Planning education for a smart urban India. In KumarA., MeshramD. S. & GowdaK. (Eds), Urban and regional planning education: Learning for India (pp. 33–45). Springer Nature.
3.
BatraL. (2009). A review of urbanization and urban policy in post-independent India. Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, Jawaharlal Nehru University. https://www.jnu.ac.in/sites/default/files/u63/12-A%20Review%20of%20Urban%20%28Lalit%20Batra%29.pdf
4.
BhanG., SrinivasS., & WatsonV. (Eds) (2018). Introduction. In The Routledge companion to planning in the global South (pp. 1–22). Routledge and Francis & Taylor.
5.
BhideA. (2013). The city produced: Urban development, violence and spatial justice in Mumbai. Tata Institute of Social Sciences. http://urk.tiss.edu/images/pdf/MumbaiCityProfile-1.pdf
6.
BhideA. (2020). Everyday violence and bottom up peace building initiatives by the urban poor: The Mandala story. International Development Planning Review, 42(1), 57–71.
7.
BurteH., & KamathL. (2017). The violence of worlding. Economic & Political Weekly, 52(7), 66–74.
8.
Census of India. (2011). Houselisting and Housing Census Data Highlights-2011. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/hlo/hlo_highlights.html
9.
ChandraP. (2017). Building universities that matter: Where are Indian institutions going wrong?Orient Blackswan.
10.
DesaiR. (2018). Urban planning, water provisioning and infrastructural violence at public housing resettlement sites in Ahmedabad, India. Water Alternatives, 11(1), 86–105.
11.
DesaiR., & SanghviS.. (2017). Water and conflict in Bombay hotel, Ahmedabad – Urban planning, governance and infrastructural violence. Economic & Political Weekly, 52(7), 49–57.
12.
DesaiR., MahadeviaD., & SanghviS. (2020). Urban planning, exclusion and negotiations in an informal subdivision: The case of Bombay hotel, Ahmedabad. International Development Planning Review, 42(1), 33–56.
13.
FainsteinS. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), 451–478.
14.
FaludiA. (1973). Planning theory. Pergamon Press.
15.
FischerF. (2009). Discursive planning: Social justice as discourse. In MarcuseP., ConnollyJ., NovyJ., OlivoI., PotterC. & SteilJ. (Eds), Searching of the just city: Debates in urban theory and practice (pp. 52–71). Routledge.
16.
ForesterJ. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press.
17.
FriedmannJ. (1996). The core curriculum in planning revisited. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15(2), 89–104.
18.
FriedmannJ. (2011). Insurgencies: Essays on planning theory. Routledge.
19.
IndorewalaH. (2015). The biggest flaw in Mumbai’s development plan: It misunderstands both development and planning. Scroll.in. https://scroll.in/article/718347/the-biggest-flaw-in-mumbais-development-plan-it-misunderstands-both-development-and-planning
20.
Institute Of Town Planners of India. (2017). List of planning courses and schools recognized by ITPI-2017. Institute of Town Planners of India. http://www.itpi.org.in/uploads/pdfs/list-of-recognized-schools-or-institutions-upto-2017.pdf
21.
KaliaR. (1987). Chandigarh: The making of an Indian city. Oxford University Press.
22.
KaliaR. (2004). Gandhinagar: Building national identity in postcolonial India. University of South Carolina Press.
23.
KumarR. S. (2018). Revised master plan 2031: Revisions only: Neither mastery nor planning?Citizen Matters. http://bengaluru.citizenmatters.in/revised-master-plan-2031-revisions-only-neither-mastery-nor-planning-22828
24.
KumarA., MeshramD. S., & GowdaK. (2016). Urban and regional planning education: Learning for India. Springer Nature.
25.
KumarA., VidhyarthiS., & PrakashP. (2021). City planning in India, 1947–2017. Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group.
26.
MahadeviaD. (2019). Climate change mitigation and the SDGs in urban India: Synergies and conflicts. In AbdullahH. (Ed.), Cities in world politics: Local responses to global challenges (pp. 33–42). CIDOB.
27.
MahadeviaD., MishraA., & JosephY. (2017). Ecology vs housing and the land rights in Guwahati. Economic & Political Weekly, 52(7), 58–65.
28.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2010). India’s urban awakening: Building inclusive cities, sustaining economic growth. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured%20Insights/Urbanization/Urban%20awakening%20in%20India/MGI_Indias_urban_awakening_full_report.ashx
29.
Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation. (2012). Report of the technical group on urban housing shortage (TG-12). Government of India. http://nbo.nic.in/pdf/urban-housing-shortage.pdf
30.
Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation. (2016). India Habitat III national report. Government of India. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/Habitat-III_India-National-Report.pdf
31.
PathakM., ShuklaP. R., GargA., & DholakiaH. (2015). Integrating climate change in city planning: Framework and case studies. In Mahendra DevS. & YedlaS. (Eds), Cities and sustainability: Issues and strategic pathways (pp. 151–177). Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer India.
32.
RamanathanU. (2006). Illegality and the urban poor. Economic & Political Weekly, 41(29), 3193–3197.
33.
ReviA., SatterthwaiteD. E., Aragón-DurandF., Corfee-MorlotJ., KiunsiR. B. R., PellingM., RobertsD. C., & SoleckiW. (2014). Urban areas. In FieldC. B., BarrosV. R., DokkenD. J., MachK. J., MastrandreaM. D., BilirT. E., ChatterjeeM., EbiK. L., EstradaY. O., GenovaR. C., GirmaB., KisselE. S., LevyA. N., MacCrackenS., MastrandreaP. R., & WhiteL. L. (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects (contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change) (pp. 535–612). Cambridge University Press.
34.
RoyA. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87.
SarinM. (1982). Urban planning in the third world: The Chandigarh experience. Mansell Publishing Limited.
37.
SetoK. C., DhakalS., BigioA., BlancoH., DelgadoG. C., DewarD., HuangL., InabaA., KansalA., LwasaS., McMahonJ. E., MüllerD. B., MurakamiJ., NagendraH., & RamaswamiA. (2014). Human settlements, infrastructure and spatial planning. In EdenhoferO., Pichs-MadrugaR., SokonaY., FarahaniE., KadnerS., SeybothK., AdlerA., BaumI., BrunnerS., EickemeierP., KriemannB., SavolainenJ., SchlömerS., von StechowC., ZwickelT. and MinxJ. C. (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change (contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change). Cambridge University Press.
38.
ShawA. (1996). Urban policy in post-independent India: An appraisal. Economic & Political Weekly, 31(4), 224–228.
39.
SietchipingR., ReidJ., & OmwambaJ. (2016). Implementing the SDGs and the New Urban Agenda. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 7(2), 10–12.
40.
TaylorN. (1998). Urban planning theory since 1945. SAGE Publications.
41.
United Nation. (2017). New Urban Agenda. United Nations. http://uploads.habitat3.org/hb3/NUA-English.pdf
42.
ValenciaS. C., SimonD., CoreseS., NordqvistJ., OlokoM., SharmaT., BuckN. T., & VersaceI. (2019). Adapting the sustainable development goals and the New Urban Agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 11(1), 4–23.
43.
VargheseS. (2020, February3). Hafeez Contractor on why Indians don’t deserve good architecture. https://indianexpress.com/article/express-sunday-eye/hafeez-contractor-architecture-6242493/
44.
VermaD., & Gita. 2003. An account of the discussion series on ‘Delhi Master Plan 2021 – Gearing up for citizens’ participation. In Delhi master plan (2021) revision monitor, Master Plan Implementation Support Group (MPISG). Architexturez Imprints. https://architexturez.net/doc/az-cf-21754
45.
WatsonV. (2016). Locating planning in the New Urban Agenda of the urban sustainable development goal. Planning Theory, 15(4), 435–448.
46.
ZinkernagelR., EvansJ., & NeijL. (2018). Applying the SDGs to cities: Business as usual or new dawn?Sustainability, 10, 3201.
