A tripartite alliance formed by the African National Congress, the South African Communist Party and the Congress of South African Trade Unions has been ruling the country with wide parliamentarian majorities. The country remains more consensual and politically inclusive than any of the other African countries in the post-independence era. This article examines three performance’s aspects of the party dominance systems: legitimacy, stability and violence. As we are living in a period in which an unprecedented number of countries have completed democratic transitions, it is politically and conceptually important that we understand the specific tasks of crafting democratic consolidation.
ArensteinR. (1990). Multi-nationalism: How many nations in the New South Africa?Indicator South Africa, 7, 12–15.
2.
ArianA., & BarnesS. H. (1974). The dominant party system: A neglected model of democratic stability. The Journal of Politics, 36(3), 592–614.
3.
BarkanJ. (2005). Emerging legislature or rubber stamp? The South African national assembly after ten years of democracy (CSSR Working Paper 134).
4.
BrattonM., & WalleN. (1994). Neopatrimonial regimes and political transitions in Africa. World Politics, 46(4), 453–489.
5.
ChuY. H. (1999). A born again dominant party? The transformation of the Koumintang and Taiwan’s regime transition. In GiliomeeH., & SimkinsC. H. (Eds.), The awkward embrace: One party domination and democracy (pp. 46–95). Harwood Academic Publishers.
6.
CoxG. (1997). Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. Cambridge University Press.
7.
DahlR. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
8.
DahlR. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
9.
De JagerN., & Du ToitP. (2013). Friend or foe? Dominant party systems in Southern Africa: Insights from the developing world. UCT Press.
10.
Du ToitP. (1999). Bridge or bridgehead? Comparing the party systems of Botswana, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi. In GiliomeeH., & SimkinsC. H. (Eds.) The awkward embrace: One party domination and democracy (pp. 193–217). Harwood Academic Publishers.
11.
Du ToitP. (2001). South Africa’s brittle peace—The problem of post-settlement violence. Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
DuvergerM. (1954). Political parties. Wiley.
13.
FriedmanS. (1999). No easy stroll to dominance: Party dominance, opposition and civil society in South Africa. In GiliomeeH., & SimkinsC. (Eds.), The awkward embrace: One party domination and democracy (pp. 97–127). Harwood Academic Publishers.
GiliomeeH., & SimkinsC. (1999). The dominant party regimes of South Africa, Mexico, Taiwan and Malaysia: A comparative assessment. In GiliomeeH., & SimkinsC. (Eds.), The awkward embrace: One party domination and democracy (pp. 1–45). Harwood Academic Publishers.
16.
GreeneK. (2008). Dominant party strategy and democratisation. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 16–31.
17.
GurrT. R. (1993). Minorities at risk. United States Institute of Peace.
18.
HorowitzD. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. University of California Press.
19.
HorowitzD. (1991). Democratic South Africa? Constitutional engineering in a divided society. Oxford University Press.
20.
HoweH. M. (1994). The South African defence force and political reform. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 32(1), 29–51.
21.
HuntingtonS. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
22.
HuntingtonS. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.
23.
KothariR. (1964). The Congress system in India. Asian Survey, 4(12), 937–948.
24.
KothariR. (1970). Continuity and change in India party’s system. Asian Survey, 10(11), 1161–1173.
25.
LaaksoM., & TaageperaR. (1979). Effective number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3–27.
26.
LaverM. J., & SchofieldN. (1990). Multiparty government: The politics of coalition in Europe. Oxford University Press.
27.
LevitskyS., & WayL. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge University Press.
28.
LewisW. A. (1965). Politics in West Africa. Oxford University Press.
29.
LijphartA. (1977). Democracy in plural societies. Yale University Press.
30.
LijphartA. (1987). Choosing an electoral system for democratic elections in South Africa: An evaluation of the principal options. In Occasional paper, critical choices for South African society. University of Cape Town Institute for the Study of Public Policy.
31.
LiphartA. (1991, March31). Negotiations on a democratic SA still on track, says expert. Sunday Times, p. 5.
32.
LijphartA. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. The American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.
33.
LijphartA. (1997). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press.
34.
LijphartA. (2008). Thinking about democracy. Power sharing and majority rule in theory and practice. Routledge.
35.
LinzJ., & StepanA. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. John Hopkins University Press.
36.
LipsetS. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69–105.
37.
LipsetS. M., & RokkanS. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: An introduction. In LipsetS. M., & RokkanS. (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. Free Press.
38.
ManceboA. (2016). La Transformación de los sistemas electorales. El Estudio de Caso de Sudáfrica. Revista Latinoamericana de Política Comparada, 11, 133–56.
39.
MattesR. (2004). Voter information government evaluations and party images 1994–2004. Working paper. Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town.
40.
MattesR., & SouthallR. (2002). Popular attitudes towards the South African electoral system: Report to the electoral task team. Democracy and Governance, Occasional paper, 1. HSRC Publishers.
41.
MattesR., & SouthallR. (2004). Popular attitudes toward the South African electoral system. Democratization, 11(1): 51–76.
42.
NeumannS. (1956). Modern political parties. Approaches to comparative politics. University of Chicago Press.
43.
PempelT. J. (1990). Uncommon democracies: The one-party dominant regimes. Cornell University Press.
44.
PennockJ. R. (1979). Democratic political theory. Princeton University Press.
45.
PiomboJ. (2004). Political institutions, social demographics and the decline of ethnic mobilisation in South Africa, 1994–99 (Working paper). Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town.
46.
PiomboJ., & NijzinkL. (2005). Electoral politics in South Africa: Assessing the first democratic decade. Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
PowellG. B. (1981). Party systems and political system performance: Voting participation, government stability and mass violence in contemporary democracies. American Political Science Review, 75, 861–879.
48.
PrzeworskiA. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
49.
ReynoldsA. (1999). Electoral systems and democratisation in Southern Africa. Oxford University Press.
50.
RosemaM. (2007). Low turnout: Threat to democracy or blessing in disguise? Consequences of citizens’ varying tendencies to vote. Electoral Studies, 26(3), 612–623.
51.
SartoriG. (1976). Parties and party systems. Cambridge University Press.
52.
SchlemmerL., & MøllerV. (1997). The shape of South African society and its challenges. Social Indicators Research, 41, 15–50.
53.
SiskT. (1885). Democratisation in South Africa: The elusive social contract. Princeton University Press.
54.
SouthallR. (1998). The centralisation and fragmentation of South Africa’s dominant party system. African Affairs, 97(389), 443–469.
55.
SouthallR. (2005). The dominant party debate in South Africa. Afrika Spectrum, 39(1): 61–82.
56.
SchattschneiderE. E. (1942). Party government. Taylor and Francis.
57.
StollH. (2013). Changing societies, changing party systems. Cambridge University Press.
58.
TaageperaR., & GrofmanB. (1985). Rethinking Duverger’s law: Predicting the effective number of parties in plurality and PR systems-parties minus issues equals one. European Journal of Political Research, 13, 341–352.
59.
TaylorC. H., & HudsonM. (1973). World handbook of political and social indicators. Yale University Press.
