Sustainable performance has become a crucial research focus in the context of regional economic integration, particularly within the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). This study used the Web of Science (WoS) database to screen 53 articles. The study employed bibliometric analysis to map the intellectual landscape and research trends in sustainable performance among RCEP countries. Using VOSviewer and Scimago Graphica, the co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence, and thematic clusters were analyzed to uncover key research areas and influential contributions. The findings highlight the increasing emphasis on environmental policies, green innovation, trade liberalization, and economic resilience in the region. Leading scholars and collaborative networks that are driving sustainability research within RCEP economies were identified. Despite significant progress, gaps remain in policy harmonization, technological innovation, and cross-border sustainability initiatives. This study offers valuable insights for policymakers, businesses, and researchers by outlining future research directions and emphasizing the need for stronger regional cooperation and policy frameworks to promote sustainable development. Moreover, the study enhances insights into sustainable performance in RCEP countries. It contributes to the ongoing discourse on balancing economic growth with environmental responsibility amid global sustainability challenges.
AkramH. W., AhmadA., DanaL.-P., KhanA., & AkhtarS. (2024). Do trade agreements enhance bilateral trade? Focus on India and Sri Lanka. Sustainability, 16(2), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020582
2.
AltinF. G., & YalçınkayaM. (2023). Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): Evaluation of trade relations between member countries using the social network analysis method. International Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 5(4), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.54821/uiecd.1395797
3.
AndersonK. (2022). Agriculture in a more uncertain global trade environment. Agricultural Economics, 53(4), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12726
4.
AsubiaroT., OnaolapoS., & MillsD. (2024). Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage. Scientometrics, 129(3), 1469–1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04948-x
5.
BroschekJ., & GoffP. M. (2021). Explaining sub-federal variation in trade agreement negotiations: The case of CETA. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(3), 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13287
6.
BukarU. A., SayeedM. S., RazakS. F. A., YogarayanS., AmoduO. A., & MahmoodR. A. R. (2023). A method for analyzing text using VOSviewer. MethodsX, 11, 102339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102339
7.
ButolloF., StaritzC., MaileF., & WuttkeT. (2024). The end of globalized production? Supply-chain resilience, technological sovereignty, and enduring global interdependencies in the post-pandemic era. Critical Sociology, 51(4–5), 779–798https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241239872
8.
ChenJ., GuoZ., & LeiZ. (2024). Research on the mechanisms of the digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises for carbon emissions reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 449, 141817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141817
9.
CuiW., QiaoC., & SongY. (2025). The influence of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership on agricultural value chain participation: Insights from a global trade analysis project model simulation. Applied Economics, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2446592
10.
DiK., ChenW., ZhangX., ShiQ., CaiQ., LiD., LiuC., & DiZ. (2023). Regional unevenness and synergy of carbon emission reduction in China’s green low-carbon circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 420, 138436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138436
11.
DonthuN., KumarS., MukherjeeD., PandeyN., & LimW. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
12.
DumitrescuE.-I., & HurlinC. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
13.
FengY., SunM., PanY., & ZhangC. (2024). Fostering inclusive green growth in China: Identifying the impact of the regional integration strategy of Yangtze River Economic Belt. Journal of Environmental Management, 358, 120952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120952
14.
GallettaS., MazzùS., NacitiV., & PaltrinieriA. (2024). A PRISMA systematic review of greenwashing in the banking industry: A call for action. Research in International Business and Finance, 69, 102262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102262
15.
GaoH., FuD., WangS., WeiM., ZouL., & LiuJ. (2024). Exploring publications in 3 major orthodontic journals: A comparative bibliometric analysis of two 10-year periods (2002–2011 and 2012–2021). American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 166(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.03.015
16.
GhoshS., MandalM. C., & RayA. (2022). A PDCA based approach to evaluate green supply chain management performance under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2022.2027292
17.
GronthyU. U., BiswasU., TapuS., SamadM. A., & NahidA. A. (2023). A bibliometric analysis on arrhythmia detection and classification from 2005 to 2022. Diagnostics, 13(10), 1732. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101732
18.
HerzallahD., Liébana-CabanillasF., Muñoz-LeivaF., & ZarcoC. (2025). Past, present, and future of social commerce: A bibliometric analysis. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02103-z
19.
HsiehP. L. (2025). Green regionalism in world trade law. World Trade Review, 24(2),172–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745624000120
20.
HuX., ChengR., ZhaoJ., WangR., ZhangT., LeiH., & LiuB. (2024). Promotion strategy of low-carbon multimodal transportation considering government regulation and cargo owners’ willingness. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04829-6
21.
JiaZ., & YangX. (2023). Assessment of the role of renewable energy financing and information and communication technology in carbon neutrality: Evidence from RCEP economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 33636–33649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24354-1
22.
JiangY., NiH., NiY., & GuoX. (2023). Assessing environmental, social, and governance performance and natural resource management policies in China’s dual carbon era for a green economy. Resources Policy, 85, 104050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104050
23.
JinX., JiangW., FangD., WangS., & ChenB. (2024). Evaluation and driving force analysis of the water-energy‑carbon nexus in agricultural trade for RCEP countries. Applied Energy, 353, 122143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122143
24.
KirbyA. (2023). Exploratory bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications, 11(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010010
25.
KwilinskiA. (2023). The relationship between sustainable development and digital transformation: Bibliometric analysis. Virtual Economics, 6(3), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2023.06.03(4)
26.
LiX., XuQ., & WangH. (2022). Environmental effects of the establishment of pilot free trade zones: Evidence from Chinese resource-based enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(8), 21384–21403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23722-1
27.
LimentaM. (2023). Shaping trade in goods relevant to renewable energy generation: The RCEP’s potential and limitation. Asia Pacific Law Review, 31(2), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2023.2216057
28.
LiuY., DongK., WangK., & Taghizadeh-HesaryF. (2024). Moving towards sustainable city: Can China’s green finance policy lead to sustainable development of cities?Sustainable Cities and Society, 102, 105242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105242
29.
MachadoJ. A. F., & Santos SilvaJ. M. C. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009
30.
MahmoodS., MisraP., SunH., LuqmanA., & PapaA. (2024). Sustainable infrastructure, energy projects, and economic growth: Mediating role of sustainable supply chain management. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05777-6
31.
MahmoodS., SunH., IqbalA., AlhussanA. A., & El-kenawyE.-S. M. (2024). Green finance, sustainable infrastructure, and green technology innovation: Pathways to achieving sustainable development goals in the belt and road initiative. Environmental Research Communications, 6(10), 105036. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad898f
32.
MishrifA., & KhanA. (2024). Do free trade agreements facilitate FDI spillover effects on domestic firms? Empirical evidence from Oman. Economies, 12(6), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12060141
33.
MohantyS., & Christopher B.P. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of the use of the Gamification Octalysis Framework in training: Evidence from Web of Science. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02243-3
34.
NaveedM., AliN., KhanS. A., & ShahzadK. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of library automation software research from 2001–2022: Evidence from the Web of Science (WoS). Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2023-0194
35.
PanS., ZhangX., & BhuiyanM. A. (2023). Analysis of the economic effect of RCEP under the “Indo-Pacific strategy”: The GTAP model. Kybernetes, 53(11), 4235–4252. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-02-2023-0241
36.
PangD., JinX., ZhengK., & TienN. H. (2024). A road toward green growth: Optimizing the role of mineral resources, fintech innovation and effective governance in G-20 economies. Resources Policy, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104983
37.
PesaranM. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
38.
PesaranM. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
39.
PesaranM. H., & YamagataT. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
40.
PhungT. Q., RasoulinezhadE., & Luong Thi ThuH. (2022). How are FDI and green recovery related in Southeast Asian economies?Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(6), 3735–3755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09398-0
41.
PrakashN., & SethiM. (2022). Emissions-foreign trade nexus: Establishing the need to harmonize environment and economics in RCEP. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 40(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-04-2022-0093
42.
RahmanN., RahmanM. N., ManiniM. M., & SharmaK. (2023). Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: The case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 51(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-023-00281-1
43.
RahmanN., & SharmaK. (2023). Exploring the impact of RCEP on Malaysia: Insights from select manufacturing industries. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 40(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-11-2022-0258
44.
RamachandranR., BabuV., & MurugesanV. P. (2023). Human resource analytics revisited: A systematic literature review of its adoption, global acceptance and implementation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(7), 2360–2390. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-04-2022-0272
45.
RenW., NiJ., JiaoW., & LiY. (2023). Explore the key factors of sustainable development: A bibliometric and visual analysis of technological progress. Sustainable Development, 31(1), 492–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2405
46.
RuiZ., PengW., QinX., & WangJ. (2023). Assessing carbon cap-and-trade policies on hybrid renewable energy investments: Implications for pricing and capacity decisions. Resources Policy, 86, 104113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104113
47.
SahidA., MalehY., & OuazzaneK. (2025). Changing landscape of fake news research on social media: A bibliometric analysis. Quality & Quantity, 59(Suppl. 2), 901–954https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02048-9
48.
ShiY. (2023). China’s shipping market supervision system under the RCEP: Influence, challenges and countermeasures. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1155452
49.
ShouX., ShiQ., & ZhangX. (2024). The adaptation and transformation of Yiwu’s foreign trade enterprises amid major changes unseen in a century (2001–2021). Transnational Corporations Review, 16(4), 200080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tncr.2024.200080
50.
Sierra-CasanovaC., Lechuga SanchoM. P., & Ramos-RodríguezA. R. (2024). What science says about entrepreneurs’ well-being: A conceptual structure review. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 37(3), 355–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/arla-01-2024-0005
51.
SikderM., WangC., YeboahF. K., & WoodJ. (2022). Driving factors of CO2 emission reduction in the logistics industry: An assessment of the RCEP and SAARC economies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(1), 2557–2587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02840-3
52.
SinghV. K., SinghP., KarmakarM., LetaJ., & MayrP. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
53.
SongY., WangZ., SongC., WangJ., & LiuR. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence on renewable energy supply chain vulnerability: Evidence from 61 countries. Energy Economics, 131, 107357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107357
54.
TanH., MongG. R., WongS. L., WongK. Y., ShengD., NyakumaB. B., OthmanM. H. D., KekH. Y., RazisA. F. A., WahabN. H. A., WahabR. A., LeeK. Q., ChiongM. C., & LeeC. H. (2024). Airborne microplastic/nanoplastic research: A comprehensive Web of Science (WoS) data-driven bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31228-7
55.
TangY., & ImranM. (2024). Trade-offs and synergies: Examining the impact of natural resource rents and energy efficiency on financial development in the RCEP context. Natural Resources Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12561
56.
WangC. A., WangL., ZhaoS., YangC., & AlbitarK. (2024). The impact of Fintech on corporate carbon emissions: Towards green and sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5776–5796. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3778
57.
WeilC., BibriS. E., LongchampR., GolayF., & AlahiA. (2023). Urban digital twin challenges: A systematic review and perspectives for sustainable smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 99, 104862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104862
58.
WenY., ShuR., GaoC., & YanS. (2024). Assessing the synergistic effect of “pollution and carbon reduction” and “economic growth”: A perspective from bilateral trade between China and RCEP countries. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1415808
59.
WesterlundJ. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
60.
XuL., & YangJ. (2024). Carbon pricing policies and renewable energy development: Analysis based on cross-country panel data. Journal of Environmental Management, 366, 121784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121784
61.
XueF., ChenT., & XuM. (2024). Effects of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership entry into force on aquatic products trade among parties. Sustainability, 16(23), 10620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310620
62.
YanaseA., & KurataH. (2022). Domestic product standards, harmonization, and free trade agreements. Review of World Economics, 158(3), 855–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-021-00446-x
63.
YangM., ChenL., WangJ., MsigwaG., OsmanA. I., FawzyS., RooneyD. W., & YapP.-S. (2022). Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01499-6
64.
YangL., & KumarasingheP. (2024). Analysis of the impact of RCEP on the industrial and innovation chains of China’s textile and clothing industry. PLoS One, 19(8), e0309708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309708
65.
YeJ., & DelaE. (2023). The effect of green investment and green financing on sustainable business performance of foreign chemical industries operating in Indonesia: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility. Sustainability, 15(14), 11218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411218
66.
YinC., SuX.-N., WangW.-C., & CuiY.-X. (2024). Structural imbalance and integrated economic development of RCEP countries on perspective of industrial network. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 209, 123728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123728
67.
YoshinoN., RasoulinezhadE., & Taghizadeh-HesaryF. (2022). Economic impacts of carbon tax in a general equilibrium framework: Empirical study of Japan. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 23(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333222500144
68.
YuH., ZhaoY., QiaoG., & AhmadM. (2023). Can green financial reform policies promote enterprise development? Empirical evidence from China. Sustainability, 15(3), 2692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032692
69.
YuwonoT., SurosoA., & NovandariW. (2024). Information and communication technology in SMEs: A systematic literature review. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00392-6
70.
ZhaiD. (2025). RCEP rules on cross-border data flows: Asian characteristics and implications for developing countries. Asia Pacific Law Review, 33(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2024.2417949
71.
ZhangS., DouW., JiR., AfthanorhanA., & HaoY. (2024). Can green finance promote the low-carbon transformation of the energy system? New evidence from city-level data in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 365, 121577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121577
72.
ZhangX., HanS., ZhengX., & ChenY. (2025). Does the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership promote forest product exports? Evidence on bilateral export performance from China. Forests, 16(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16010064
73.
ZhaoL., & RasoulinezhadE. (2023). Role of natural resources utilization efficiency in achieving green economic recovery: Evidence from BRICS countries. Resources Policy, 80, 103164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103164
74.
ZhouJ., WangL., HuangQ., & CaiH. (2024). An empirical study on the impact of tariff reduction on China’s textile industry under the background of RCEP. Economics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2022-0102
75.
ZhuN., & HuangS. (2023). Impact of the tariff concessions of the RCEP agreement on the structure and evolution mechanism of manufacturing trade networks. Social Networks, 74, 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2023.01.008
76.
ZhuangW., PanG., GuW., ZhouS., HuQ., GuZ., WuZ., LuS., & QiuH. (2023). Hydrogen economy driven by offshore wind in regional comprehensive economic partnership members. Energy & Environmental Science, 16(5), 2014–2029. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ee02332f
77.
ZreikM. (2022). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) for the Asia–Pacific region and world. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 40(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-02-2022-0035
