Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
An Analysis of Trade Between Belt and Road Initiative and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Countries in Context of Regional Trade Agreements
This study investigates the nuanced relationship between globalisation and regional trade agreements (RTAs) in fostering international trade among belt and road initiative (BRI) nations and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) countries between 1999 and 2019. This research uses a structural gravity model with ordinary least squares (OLS) and Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Model (PPML) estimation techniques. The findings highlight the need to pair RTAs with globalisation-friendly policies to create fair and inclusive trade systems. Improving infrastructure like roads, ports and digital networks, along with advancing technology, can help member nations maximise their trade potential. Policymakers should focus on reducing gaps, such as poor transportation or limited internet access, that hinder some countries from fully benefiting. Addressing these issues not only makes trade more efficient but also ensures that the advantages of RTAs are shared more equally. Over time, these efforts can drive sustainable economic growth by boosting industries, creating jobs and improving living standards across participating nations.
AielloF., CardamoneP., & AgostinoM. R. (2010). Evaluating the impact of nonreciprocal trade preferences using gravity models. Applied Economics, 42(29), 3745–3760.
2.
AitkenN. D. (1973). The effect of the EEC and EFTA on European trade: A temporal cross-section analysis. The American Economic Review, 63(5), 881–892.
3.
AndersonJ. E., MilotC. A., & YotovY. V. (2011). The incidence of geography on Canada’s services trade (No. w17630). National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
AndersonJ. E., & Van WincoopE. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.
5.
AndersonJ. E., & YotovY. V. (2016). Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements, 1990–2002. Journal of International Economics, 99, 279–298.
6.
ArvisJ. F., & ShepherdB. (2013). The Poisson quasi-maximum likelihood estimator: A solution to the ‘adding up’ problem in gravity models. Applied Economics Letters, 20(6), 515–519.
7.
BaierS. L., & BergstrandH. (2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95.
8.
BaierS. L., BergstrandJ. H., & ClanceM. (2015). Heterogeneous economic integration agreement effects. Journal of Development Economics, 135, 587–608.
9.
BaierS. L., BergstrandJ. H., & ClanceM. W. (2017). Heterogeneous economic integration agreements’ effects, gravity, and welfare (No. 2017–05). https://ideas.repec.org/p/not/notgep/17-05.html
10.
BaniyaS., RochaN., & RutaM. (2020). Trade effects of the New Silk Road: A gravity analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 146, 102467.
11.
BergstrandJ. H., LarchM., & YotovY. V. (2015). Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation. European Economic Review, 78, 307–327.
12.
BlomqvistH. C. (2004). Explaining trade flows of Singapore. Asian Economic Journal, 18(1), 25–43.
13.
BradaJ. C., & MendezJ. A. (1985). Economic integration among developed, developing and centrally planned economies: A comparative analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(4), 549–556.
14.
BrandiC. A. (2017). Sustainability standards and sustainable development–synergies and trade‐offs of transnational governance. Sustainable Development, 25(1), 25–34.
15.
BreussF., & EggerP. (1999). How reliable are estimations of East-West trade potentials based on cross-section gravity analyses?Empirica, 26, 81–94.
16.
BunM. J., & KlaassenF. (2002). The importance of dynamics in panel gravity models of trade. Available at SSRN 306100.
17.
CipollinaM., & SalvaticiL. (2010). Reciprocal trade agreements in gravity models: A meta‐analysis. Review of International Economics, 18(1), 63–80.
18.
ColeS., & TenreyoS. (2021). Economic integration and growth. IMF Economic Review, 69(3), 467–469.
19.
DaiM., YotovY. V., & ZylkinT. (2014). On the trade-diversion effects of free trade agreements. Economics Letters, 122(2), 321–325.
20.
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2024). Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP). https://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/in-force/rcep
21.
DisdierA. C., & HeadK. (2008). The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1), 37–48.
22.
DuJ., & ZhangY. (2018). Does one belt one road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment?China Economic Review, 47, 189–205.
23.
DupuyL., & AgarwalaM. (2014). International trade and sustainable development. In AtkinsonG., DietzS., NeumayerE., & AgarwalaM. (Eds.), Handbook of Sustainable Development (pp. 399–417). Edward Elgar Publishing.
24.
ElliottR. J., & IkemotoK. (2004). Afta and the Asian crisis: Help or hindrance to ASEAN intra‐regional trade?Asian Economic Journal, 18(1), 1–23.
25.
EhizuelenM. M. O. (2017). More African countries on the route: The positive and negative impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative. Transnational Corporations Review, 9(4), 341–359.
26.
EndohM. (1999). The transition of postwar Asia-Pacific trade relations. Journal of Asian Economics, 10(4), 571–589.
27.
FallyT. (2015). Structural gravity and fixed effects. Journal of International Economics, 97(1), 76–85.
28.
FeenstraR. C. (2015). Advanced international trade: theory and evidence. Princeton University Press.
29.
FontouraM. P., Martínez-GalánE., & Dias ProencaI. M. (2008). Trade potential in an enlarged European union: A recent approach. Portuguese Economic Journal, 7(3).
30.
GhoshS., & YamarikS. (2004). Are regional trading arrangements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis. Journal of International Economics, 63(2), 369–395.
31.
HalkosG., & GkampouraE. C. (2021). Where do we stand on the 17 sustainable development goals? An overview on progress. Economic Analysis and Policy, 70, 94–122.
32.
HeadK., & MayerT. (2014). Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. In GopinathG., HelpmanE., & RogoffK. (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 131)–195). Elsevier.
33.
HeidB., LarchM., & YotovY. (2015). A simple method to estimate the effects of non-discriminatory trade policy within structural gravity models [Unpublished]. http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2015/Papers/439.pdf
34.
InamdarN. (2023, October2). Can India-Europe corridor rival China’s belt and road?BBC NEWS. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66957019
35.
ManzoorH., & MirP. A. (2023). General equilibrium trade policy analysis among one belt one road nations using structural gravity framework. Foreign Trade Review, 58(4), 484–503.
36.
MargalitY. (2012). Lost in globalisation: International economic integration and the sources of popular discontent. International Studies Quarterly, 56(3), 484–500.
37.
MelitzJ., & ToubalF. (2014). Native language, spoken language, translation and trade. Journal of International Economics, 93(2), 351–363.
38.
PöyhönenP. (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90, 93–100.
39.
ShibasakiR., TanabeS., KatoH., & LeeP. T. W. (2019). Could Gwadar Port in Pakistan be a new gateway? A network simulation approach in the context of the Belt and Road initiative. Sustainability, 11(20), 5757.
40.
SiliverstovsB., & SchumacherD. (2009). Estimating gravity equations: To log or not to log?Empirical Economics, 36, 645–669.
41.
SilvaJ. S., & TenreyroS. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658.
42.
SinghJ., ShreetiV., & UrdhwaresheP. (2022). The impact of bilateral investment treaties on FDI inflows into India: Some empirical results. Foreign Trade Review, 57(3), 310–323.
43.
TinbergenJ. (1962). In HartogF. (Ed.), Shaping the world economy; suggestions for an international economic policy.
44.
VinesD. (2018). The BRI and RCEP: Ensuring cooperation in the liberalisation of trade in Asia. Economic & Political Studies, 6(3), 338–348.
45.
WoolridgeJ. M. (2011, March). Thoughts on heterogeneity in econometric models. In Presidential Address at the annual meeting for the Midwest Economics Association (MEA), St. Louis, Missouri, March (pp. 19–20).
46.
World Bank. (2017). Cambodia: Sustaining strong growth for the benefit of all. World Bank Group. https://hubs.worldbank.org/docs/imagebank/pages/docprofile.aspx?nodeid=27520556
47.
YotovY. V. (2012) A simple solution to the distance puzzle in international trade. Economics Letters, 117(3), 794–798.
48.
YotovY. V., PiermartiniR., MonteiroJ.-A., & LarchM. (2016). An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: The structural gravity model. World Trade Organization.
49.
YuS., QianX., & LiuT. (2019). Belt and road initiative and Chinese firms’ outward foreign direct investment. Emerging Markets Review, 41, 100629.
