Effect of Board Diversity,Promoter’s Presence and Multiple Directorships on Firm Performance

Abstract

Purpose: This article analyses the effect of board diversity on the financial performance of non-financial firms listed in the Nifty Index. Specifically, it examines the mediation effect of the promoter’s presence and multiple directorships on the financial performance of the firm, that is, return on net worth (RONW), return on equity (ROE) and its sales growth.

Methodology: The article uses the hierarchical regression model to analyse the effect of board diversity on financial performance. The presence of the promoters on the board and multiple directorships are taken as the control variables.

Findings: Empirical results show the significant effect of the promoter’s presence on the board on the firm’s earnings and a significant positive effect of firm age, board size, age diversity and experience diversity on the financial performance. However, we do not find any statistically significant relationship between firm size and financial performance in any model. The results also show that the age and experience of the female directors are significantly less compared to the male directors. However, the age and experience of the non-executive directors and independent directors are found to be higher among the other positions held by the directors. We also find a negative relationship between multiple directorships in other firms and the financial performance of the firm.

Value: The article proposes that there should be a greater number of independent directors in a firm that has its promoter on the board. One recommendation for the board is to reduce the number of directorships held in other boards to ensure more constructive contribution towards the firm’s financial performance. The article studies the effect of the promoter’s presence on the board and multiple directorships held by board members on the financial performance of the firm.

Keywords

Age diversity experience diversity return on net worth sales growth multiple directorships financial performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdul Latif

Kamardin

Mohd

K. T. N.

CheAdam

(2013). Multiple directorships, board characteristics and firm performance in Malaysia. Management . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5923/j.mm.20130302.07

Adams

R. B.

Ferreira

(2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

Allison

P. D.

(1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2094626

Amason

A. C.

Shrader

R. C.

Tompson

G. H.

(2006). Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.008

Bantel

K. A.

Wiersema

M. F.

(1992). Top management team demography and process. The Academy of Management Journal . Retrieved from https://doi.org/138.232.236.8

Bhatt

R. R.

Bhattacharya

(2015). Board structure and firm performance in Indian IT firms. Journal of Advances in Management Research . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-07-2014–0042

Biggadike

(1979). The risky business of diversification. Harvard Business Review . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317–8_13

Blau

(1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. JGIM Journal of General Internal Medicine . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36763–5

Boone

Hendriks

(2009). Top management team diversity and firm performance: Moderators of functional-background and locus-of-control diversity. Management Science . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0899

10.

Brown

W. O.

Maloney

M. T.

(1999). Exit, voice, and the role of corporate directors: Evidence from acquisition performance . SSRN. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.160308

11.

Brush

C. G.

Vanderwerf

P. A.

(1992). A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90010–O

12.

Campbell

Mínguez-Vera

(2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630–y

13.

Carter

D. A.

D’Souza

Simkins

B.J.

Simpson

W. G.

(2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review .

14.

Carter

D. A.

Simkins

B.J.

Simpson

W. G.

(2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review , 38(1), 33–53. doi: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1540-6288.00034.

15.

Cashman

G. D.

Gillan

S. L.

Jun

(2012). Going overboard? On busy directors and firm value. Journal of Banking and Finance .

16.

Chen

L. Y.

Lai

J. H.

Chen

C. R.

(2015). Multiple directorships and the performance of mergers & acquisitions. North American Journal of Economics and Finance .

17.

Cohen

(1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

18.

Core

J. E.

Holthausen

R. W.

Larcker

D. F.

(1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics , 51(3), 371–406.

19.

Cotter

J. F.

Shivdasani

Zenner

(1997). Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00886–0

20.

Darmadi

(2011). Board diversity and firm performance: The Indonesian evidence. Corporate Ownership and Control . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2c4p4

21.

Das

Dey

(2016). Role of corporate governance on firm performance: A study on large Indian corporations after implementation of companies’ Act 2013. Asian Journal of Business Ethics . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-016-0061–7

22.

Demise

(2006). OECD principles of corporate governance. In Demise

Miwa

Nabayashi

Nakoshi

(Eds.), Corporate governance in Japan: From the viewpoints of management, accounting, and the market . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-30920–8_10

23.

Demsetz

Villalonga

(2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00020–7

24.

Dwyer

Richard

O. C.

Chadwick

(2003). Gender diversity in management and firm performance: The influence of growth orientation and organizational culture. Journal of Business Research . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00329–0

25.

Erhardt

N. L.

Werbel

J. D.

Shrader

C. B.

(2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–8683.00011

26.

Fama

E. F.

Jensen

M. C.

(1983). Separation of ownership and control separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1086/467037

27.

Ferris

S. P.

Jagannathan

Pritchard

A. C.

(2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. Journal of Finance . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1540–6261.00559

28.

Fich

E. M.

Shivdasani

(2012). Are busy boards effective monitors. In Boubaker

Nguyen

B. D.

Nguyen

D. K.

(Eds.), Corporate governance: Recent developments and new trends . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31579–4_10

29.

Finkelstein

(1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/256485

30.

Ghabayen

M. A.

(2012). Board characteristics and firm performance: Case of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v2i2.2145

31.

Goodstein

Gautam

Boeker

(1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150305

32.

Gordini

Rancati

(2017). Gender diversity in the Italian boardroom and firm financial performance. Management Research Review . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2016–0039

33.

Hambrick

D. C.

(2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24345254

34.

Haniffa

Hudaib

(2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–5957.2006.00594.x

35.

Hay

Verdin

Williamson

(1993). Successful new ventures: Lessons for entrepreneurs and investors. Long Range Planning . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90075–Q

36.

Homberg

Bui

H. T. M.

(2013). Top management team diversity. Group & Organization Management . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113493925

37.

Hunton

J. E.

Rose

J. M.

(2008). Can directors’ self-interests influence accounting choices. Accounting, Organizations and Society . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.10.001

38.

Jaccard

Wan

C. K.

Turrisi

(1990). The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 25(4), 467–478.

39.

Jackling

Johl

(2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–8683.2009.00760.x

40.

Jameson

Prevost

Puthenpurackal

(2014). Controlling shareholders, board structure, and firm performance: Evidence from India. Journal of Corporate Finance . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.04.003

41.

Jiraporn

Davidson

W. N.

DaDalt

Ning

(2009). Too busy to show up? An analysis of directors’ absences. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2008.08.003

42.

Judge

W. Q.

Zeithaml

C. P.

(1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/256315

43.

Kang

J. K.

Shivdasani

(1995). Firm performance, corporate governance, and top executive turnover in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics .

44.

Kauer

Prinzessin Waldeck

T. C.

Schuffer

(2007). Effects of top management team characteristics on strategic decision making: Shifting attention to team member personalities and mediating processes. Management Decision . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740710762017

45.

Kilduff

Angelmar

Mehra

(2000). Top management-team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions. Organization Science . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.1.21.12569

46.

Lubatkin

M. H.

Simsek

Ling

Veiga

J. F.

(2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712

47.

Madan Mohan

Muthu

(2016). A study on the impact of corporate governance on financial performance. ICTACT Journal on Management Studies . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21917/ijms.2015.0005

48.

Mans-Kemp

Viviers

Collins

(2018). Exploring the causes and consequences of director overboardedness in an emerging market. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-018-0048–9

49.

Menz

(2012). Functional top management team members: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311421830

50.

Miller

Triana

M. del C.

(2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6486.2009.00839.x

51.

Norburn

Birley

(1988). The top management team and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090303

52.

Pitcher

Smith

A. D.

(2001). Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organization Science . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.1.10120

53.

Sapienza

H. J.

Grimm

C. M.

(1997). Founder characteristics, start-up process, and strategy/structure variables as predictors of shortline railroad performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1201191

54.

Shekhar

A. W.

Krishnan

(2018). SEBI partially accepts Kotak committee’s recommendation on corporate governance. INFOLEX . Retrieved from http://www.mondaq.com/india/x/705630/Corporate+Governance/SEBI+Partially+Accepts+Kotak+Committees+Recommendations+On+Corporate+Governance

55.

Shrader

R. C.

Simon

(1997). Corporate versus independent new ventures: Resource, strategy, and performance differences. Journal of Business Venturing . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00053–5

56.

Smith

K. G.

Smith

K. A.

Olian

J. D.

Sims

H. P.

O’Bannon

D. P.

Scully

J. A.

(1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly , 39(3), 412–438.

57.

Velnampy

P. T.

(2013). Corporate governance and firm performance: A study of Sri Lankan manufacturing companies. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-08-5118–7