This article seeks to examine challenges affecting the ethical philosophy of senior management at South Africa’s national oil and gas company. South Africa’s economy has been downgraded to junk status due to mismanagement of public funds in public enterprises. Government parastatals have come under major scrutiny in recent years for transgressing the code of good conduct prescribed by the King Report. The article presents a conceptual exploration of corporate governance challenges and is underpinned by diffusion of responsibility and moral hypocrisy which has roots in social psychology. Social psychology can be used as an overlap for strategy and institutional concepts, which encourages new ways of addressing corporate responsibility. The research reveals the impact on state enterprises financial stability when senior management diffuses responsibility and is not prosecuted or held accountable under the constitutional Act 108 of 1996. The article highlights one of the many corporate responsibility transgressions by state-owned enterprises who should be responsible for building the economy rather than destroying public value.
AdeoyA. A. (2013). The key challenges of the corporate governance of firms: Empirical evidence from sub-saharan African Anglophone (SSAA) countries (Doctoral dissertation). Brunel University London, London, UK.
2.
AmirO.ArielyD. (2007). Decisions by rules: The case of unwillingness to pay for beneficial delays. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 142–152.
3.
AndreassonS. (2011). Understanding corporate governance reform in South Africa Anglo-American divergence, the King Reports, and hybridization. Business & Society, 50(4), 647–673.
4.
AshkanasyN. M.DausC. S. (2002). Emotion in the workplace: The new challenge for managers. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 76–86.
5.
BatsonC. D.KobrynowiczD.DinnersteinJ. L.KampfH. C.WilsonA. D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1335–1348.
6.
ChekrounP.BrauerM. (2002). The bystander effect and social control behavior: The effect of the presence of others on people’s reactions to norm violations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(6), 853–867.
7.
DarleyJ. M.LatanéB. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.
8.
DubnickM. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 376–417.
9.
FanP.S. (2004). Review of Literature and Empirical Research on Corporate Governance. Financial Services Group Training Unit, The Monetary Authority of Singapore, Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.mas.gov.sg/~/media/resource/publications/staff_papers/MAS%20Staff%20Paper%20No%2029.pdf
10.
GregoryH. J.SimmsM. E. (1999). Corporate governance: What it is and why it matters. Paper presented at the 9th International Anti-Corruption Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
11.
HadjikyprianouG C. (2015). The principle of ‘Comply or Explain’ underpinning the UK corporate governance regulation: Is there a need for a change?Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law Journal, 7(81), 33 pages.
12.
Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/329757088/State-of-Capture-Public-Protector-Report#from_embed
13.
JonesR. M. (2010). Corporate governance and accountability (Doctoral dissertation). Boston, MA: Boston College.
14.
KeayA. (2014). Comply or explain in corporate governance codes: In need of greater regulatory oversight?. Legal Studies, 34(2), 279–304.
15.
KeayA.LoughreyJ. (2015). The framework for board accountability in corporate governance. Legal Studies, 35(2), 252–279.
16.
KhanH. (2011). A literature review of corporate governance. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 25, pp. 1–5.
17.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215–221.
18.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
19.
LuoY. (2005). Corporate governance and accountability in multinational enterprises: Concepts and agenda. Journal of International Management, 11, 1–18.
20.
MadonselaT. (2016). The state capture report. Retrieved from MallinC. A. (2018). Corporate governance (6th ed.). Oxford: University Oxford Press.
McKuneC. (2015). PetroSA’s ex-boss must repay R83m. Retrieved from http://mg.co.za/article/2015-01-08-petrosas-ex-boss-must-repay-r83m/
23.
MilgramS. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371.
24.
MostoviczE. I.KakabadseA.KakabadseN. K. (2011). The four pillars of corporate responsibility: Ethics, leadership, personal responsibility and trust. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 11(4), 489–500.
25.
MostoviczE. I.KakabadseN.KakabadseA. (2009). CSR: The role of leadership in driving ethical outcomes. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(4), 448–460.
26.
MulganR. (2000). ‘Accountability’: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.
27.
NapalG. (2011). Does the economic crisis call for reinforcing ethics?Paper presented at the International Conference on Financial Management and Economics, Singapore.
28.
News24Wire. (2015). Zuma Repeats that “the ANC comes first”. Retrieved from https://businesstech.co.za/news/government/104305/zuma-repeats-that-the-anc-comes-first/
29.
OkeahalamC. C. (2004). Corporate governance and disclosure in Africa: Issues and challenges. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 12(4), 359–370.
30.
PetrickJ. A.SchererR. F. (2003). The Enron scandal and the neglect of management integrity capacity. American Journal of Business, 18(1), 37–50.
31.
PillayS. (2004). Corruption–the challenge to good governance: A South African perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(7), 586–605.
32.
RibsteinL. E. (2005). Accountability and responsibility in corporate governance. Notre Dame Law Review, 81, 1431.
33.
RossouwG. J. (2005a). Business ethics and corporate governance: A global survey. Business and Society, 44(1), 32–39.
34.
RossouwG. J. (2005b). Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa. Business and Society, 44(1), 94–106.
35.
SimmsA.NicholsT. (2014). Social loafing: A review of the literature. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 15(1), 58.
36.
ValdesoloP.DeStenoD. (2008). The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1334–1338.
37.
ValdesoloP.DeStenoD. A. (2007). Moral hypocrisy: Social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychological Science, 18, 689–690.
38.
VaughnM.RyanL. V. (2006). Corporate governance in South Africa: A bellwether for the continent? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 504–512.
39.
VogelgesangG. R. (2007). The impact of relational transparency on trust under changing conditions. Paper presented at the Academy of Management National Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
