The deep-rooted patriarchal norms and the culture of son preference in India played a central role for avoiding the birth of a girl child. This study attempts to understand the extent of acceptance of daughters in selected high and low son preference states of India by using data from District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS) 3 and 4. Understanding the characteristics of the couples who have stopped childbearing only with daughters provide insights about the prevailing norms on acceptance of daughters. The results revealed that, from DLHS 3 to 4, there is an increasing trend in the daughter preference in both high and low son preference states. The results of the study indicate that the acceptance of daughters is initially emerging among younger, educated, urban and richer couples. The gradual increase in acceptance of daughters reveals weakening of rigid patriarchal norms and son preference in the study states.
ArnoldF. (1985). Measuring the effect of sex preference on fertility: The case of Korea. Demography, 22(2), 280–288.
2.
ArnoldF. (1992). Sex preference and its demographic and health implications. International Family Planning Perspectives, 18(3), 93–101.
3.
BehrmanJ., & DuvisacS. (2017). The relationship between women’s paid employment and women’s stated son preference in India. Demographic Research, 36(52), 1601–1636.
4.
ClelandJ., VerrallJ., & VaessenM. (1983). Preferences for the sex of children and their influence on reproductive behavior. World Fertility Survey Comparative Studies, No. 27. International Statistical Institute, Voorburg.
5.
CowanB. (1990). Let her die. Indian Maternal and Child Health, 1(4), 127–128.
6.
Das GuptaM., & Mari BhatP. N. (1997). Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Population Studies, 51(3), 307–315.
7.
Diamond-SmithN., & BishaiD. (2015). Evidence of self-correction of child sex ratios in India: A district-level analysis of child sex ratios from 1981 to 2011. Demography, 52(2), 641–666.
8.
DysonT., & MooreM. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy and demographic behaviour in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.
9.
EdmeadesJ., PandeR., MacquarrieK., FalleT., & MalhotraA. (2012). Two sons and a daughter: Sex composition and women’s reproductive behaviour in Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 44(6), 749–764.
10.
JefferyP., JefferyR., & LyonA. (1984). When did you last see your mother? Aspects of female autonomy in rural North India (Unpublished manuscript). Paper presented at the IUSSP Seminar on Micro-Approaches to Demographic Research held at the Australian National University, Canberra, 3–7 September 1984.
11.
KishwarM. (1995). When daughters are unwanted. Manushi, 86, 15–22. http://www.manushiindia.org/pdfs_issues/PDF%20files%2086/when_daughters_are_unwanted.pdf
12.
MalhiO. (1993). Impact of women’s education on sex preferences, values and aspirations for children: Evidence Haryana. Man and Development, 15, 46–62.
13.
MooreM. (1973). Cross-cultural surveys of peasant family structures: Some comments. American Anthropologist, 75(3), 911–915.
14.
MutharayappaR., ChoeM. K., ArnoldF., & RoyT. K. (1997). Is son preference slowing down India’s transition to low fertility?NFHS Bulletin, No. 4. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences and East-West Center Program on Population.
15.
NagM. (1992). Sex preference in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and its effect on fertility. Demography India, 20, 163–185.
16.
NarzaryP. K., & SharmaS. M. (2013). Daughter preference and contraceptive-use in matrilineal tribal societies in Meghalaya, India. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 31(2), 278–289.
17.
RoyT. K., & ChattopadhyayA. (2012). Daughter discrimination and future sex ratio at birth in India. Asian Population Studies, 8(3), 281–299.
18.
SekherT. V. (2010). Special financial incentive schemes for the girl child in India: A review of select schemes. International Institute for Population Sciences.
19.
SekherT. V. (2012). Skewed sex ratios, conditional cash transfers and promotion of girl children: The Indian experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, San Francisco, CA.
20.
SopherD. E. (Ed.). (1980). An exploration of India: Geographical perspectives on society and culture. Longman.
21.
StallardR. (2016). Sex-selective abortion in India. https://www.childreach.org.uk/sites/default/files/imce/India%20Sex%20Selective%20Abortion%20FINAL.pdf
22.
SubramanianS. V., & SelvarajS. (2009). Social analysis of sex imbalance in India: Before and after the implementation of the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PNDT) Act. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 63, 245–252.
23.
TisdellC., & RegmiG. (2005). Prejudice against female children: Economic and cultural explanations, and Indian evidence. International Journal of Social Economics, 32(6), 541–553.
