Who benefits more from the use of social media—those who are already socialable and have a wide network of friends or those who do not and so seek to make up for their deficiency by going online? The social enhancement hypothesis says that extroverts benefit more through being able to enlarge their network of friends online more than introverts. The social compensation hypothesis, on the other hand, argues that social media use benefits introverts more; shy users who avoid face-to-face communication can communicate freely online. MANOVA analysis of the survey of 1,392 college students in a western state of India who are Facebook users found evidence predominantly for the social enhancement hypothesis.
AbbasR., & MeschG. (2018). Do rich teens get richer? Facebook use and the link between offline and online social capital among Palestinian youth in Israel. Information, Communication & Society, 21(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1261168
2.
AfshanA., AskariI., & ManickamL. S. S. (2015). Shyness, self-construal, extraversion–introversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism: A cross-cultural comparison among college students. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015587559
3.
Al-KandariA., MelkoteS. R., & SharifA. (2016). Needs and motives of Instagram users that predict self-disclosure use: A case study of young adults in Kuwait. Journal of Creative Communications, 11(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258616644808
4.
Amichai-HamburgerY., KaplanH., & DorpatcheonN. (2008). Click to the past: The impact of extroversion by users of nostalgic websites on the use of Internet social services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.005
5.
AmsbaryJ., & McCroskeyJ. C. (2009). Communication traits and social phobia. Human Communication, 12(4), 485–492.
6.
BarghJ. A., McKennaK. Y. A., & FitzsimonsG. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48.
7.
BarkerV. (2009). Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: The influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 209–213. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0228
8.
BarnesR., MaharD., WongI., & RuneK. (2017). A neurotic extrovert who is open to new experiences? Understanding how personality traits may impact the commenting behaviors of online news readers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(3), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1344671
9.
BippusA., & DalyJ. A. (1999). What do people think causes stage fright? Naive attributions about the reasons for public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 48(1), 63–72.
10.
Booth-ButterfieldM., & ButterfieldS. (1986). Effects of evaluation, task-structure, trait-CA, and reticence on state-CA and behavioral disruption in dyadic settings. Communication Monographs, 53, 144–159.
11.
BurgoonJ. K. (1976). The unwillingness to communicate scale: Development and validation. Communication Monographs, 43(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757609375916
12.
ÇapanS. A. (2013). An online alternative to alleviate communication apprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2 n.3p.202
13.
DhirA., ChenG. M., & ChenS. (2017). Why do we tag photographs on Facebook? Proposing a new gratifications scale. New Media & Society, 19(4), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815611062
14.
DhirA., ChenS., & NieminenM. (2016). The effects of demographics, technology accessibility, and unwillingness to communicate in predicting internet gratifications and heavy internet use among adolescents. Social Science Computer Review, 34(3), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315582854
15.
DiwakarV. (2016). ‘It’s complicated’: The construction of Indian middle-class teens in social media. Journal of Creative Communications, 11(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258616644813
16.
EllisonN. B., SteinfieldC., & LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
17.
ForeggerS. K. (2008). The uses and gratifications of Facebook.com (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Communication, Michigan State University, USA.
18.
FrisonE., & EggermontS. (2020). Toward an integrated and differential approach to the relationships between loneliness, different types of Facebook use, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Communication Research, 47(5), 701–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215617506
19.
Gil de ZúñigaH., DiehlT., HuberB., & LiuJ. (2017). Personality traits and social media use in 20 countries: How personality relates to frequency of social media use, social media news use, and social media use for social interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(9), 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0295
20.
HansonG., HaridakisP. M., CunninghamA. W., SharmaR., & PonderJ. D. (2010). The 2008 presidential campaign: Political cynicism in the age of Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.513470
21.
HaridakisP. M., & RubinA. M. (2003). Motivation for watching television violence and viewer aggression. Mass Communication & Society, 6(1), 29–56.
22.
HuntD., AtkinD., & KrishnanA. (2012). The influence of computer-mediated communication apprehension on motives for Facebook use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.678717
23.
KatzE., BlumlerJ. G., & GurevitchM. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509–523.
24.
KimJ., SongH., & LeeS. (2018). Extrovert and lonely individuals’ social TV viewing experiences: A mediating and moderating role of social presence. Mass Communication and Society, 21(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1350715
25.
KrautR., KieslerS., BonevaB., CummingsJ., HelgesonV., & CrawfordA. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74. http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=hcii
26.
LivingstoneS. (2010). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy, and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411.
27.
McCroskeyJ. (2009). Communication apprehension: What we have learned in the last four decades. Human Communication, 12(2), 157–171.
28.
McCroskeyJ. C. (1993). An introduction to rhetorical communication (6th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
29.
McCroskeyJ. C., HeiselA. D., & RichmondV. P. (2001). Eysenck’s BIG THREE and communication traits: Three correlational studies. Communication Monographs, 68(4), 360. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128068
30.
McCroskeyJ. C., & RichmondV. P. (1982). Communication apprehension and shyness: Conceptual and operational distinctions. Communication Studies, 33, 458–468.
31.
MiczoN. (2004). Humor ability, unwillingness to communicate, loneliness, and perceived stress: Testing a security theory. Communication Studies, 55(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388615
32.
MirI. A. (2017). Users on social network sites—Flight from reality and its effects on acceptance of social network advertising: A gratification perspective. Journal of Creative Communications, 12(2), 98–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258617708367
33.
OptS. K., & LoffredoD. A. (2000). Rethinking communication apprehension: A Myers-Briggs perspective. The Journal of Psychology, 134(5), 556–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980009598236
34.
PapacharissiZ., & MendelsonA. (2011). Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. In PapathanassopoulosS. (Ed.), Media perspectives for the21st century (pp. 212–230). Routledge.
35.
PapacharissiZ., & RubinA. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175–196.
36.
PerlmanD., & PeplauL. A. (1981). Towards a social psychology of loneliness. In DuckS. & GilmourR. (Eds.), Personal relationships in disorder (pp. 31–56). Academic Press.
37.
PriorM. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(1), 130–143.
38.
Punyanunt-CarterN. M., De La CruzJ. J., & WrenchJ. S. (2017). Investigating the relationships among college students’ satisfaction, addiction, needs, communication apprehension, motives, and uses and gratifications with Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 870–875.
39.
RossC., OrrE. S., SisicM., ArseneaultJ. M., SimmeringM. G., & OrrR. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578–586.
40.
RuggieroT. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
41.
RuppelE. K., & McKinleyC. J. (2015). Social support and social anxiety in use and perceptions of online mental health resources: Exploring social compensation and enhancement. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(8), 462–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0652
42.
RyanT., & XenosS. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1658–1664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004
43.
ScealyM., PhillipsJ. G., & StevensonR. (2002). Shyness and anxiety as predictors of patterns of Internet usage. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(6), 507–515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109493102321018141
44.
SheldonP. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20(2), 67–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.20.2.67
45.
Statista (2018). Dossier: Social media usage worldwide. https://www.statista.com/study/12393/social-networks-statista-dossier/
46.
Statista (2020). Number of Facebook users across India as of January 2018, by age and gender. https://www.statista.com/statistics/717615/india-number-of-facebook-users-by-age-and-gender/
47.
SundarS. S., & LimperosA. M. (2013). Uses and gratifications 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 504–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
48.
TasenteT., CiacuN., & SanduM. (2012). Facebook, between socialization and personal image promotion. Communication & Marketing/Revista De Comunicare Si Marketing, 3(5), 13–24.
49.
TewksburyD., & AlthausS. L. (2000). An examination of motivations for using the World Wide Web. Communication Research Reports, 17, 127–138.
50.
UristaM. A., DongO., & DayK. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication, 12(2), 215–229.
51.
ValkenburgP. M., SchoutenA. P., & PeterJ. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet. New Media & Society, 7(3), 383–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444805052282
52.
WangS. S. (2015). To unfriend or not: exploring factors affecting users in keeping friends on Facebook and the implications on mediated voyeurism. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(5), 465–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.990469
53.
WatsonB. R. (2007). Speaking up in the 21st century: The effects of communication apprehension and Internet self-efficacy on use of social networking websites. (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of Missouri, USA. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/4951/research.pdf
54.
WrenchJ. S., & Punyanunt-CarterN. M. (2007). The relationship between computer-mediated communication competence, apprehension, self-efficacy, perceived confidence, and social presence. Southern Communication Journal, 72(4), 355–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417940701667696
55.
Wright IIJ., & CaraA. J. (1983). An analysis of the interpersonal dimension of communication anxiety. Communication, 12(1), 161.
56.
XuD., & GuoL. (2018). Use and gratifications of singing competition reality shows: Linking narcissism and gratifications sought with the multimedia viewing of Chinese audiences. Mass Communication and Society, 21(2), 198–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1404616
57.
ZhangY., TangL. S., & LeungL. (2011). Gratifications, collective self-esteem, online emotional openness, and traitlike communication apprehension as predictors of Facebook uses. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(12), 733–739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0042
58.
ZywicaJ., & DanowskiJ. (2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook™ and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 1–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01429.x
