Because of the rapid demographic shifts in the United States (US), it is vital to examine how voters of different ethnic backgrounds perceive the ethnic source cue of a candidate in political advertising and how such perceptions influence voting behaviour. We used a post-test-only experiment to investigate the effects of candidate’s ethnic source cue and party affiliation on voters’ homophily perceptions and voting intent. A total of 335 college students from a large southwestern university in the US were recruited to take part in a post-test-only experiment. Results from multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) found that candidate’s ethnic source cue and party affiliation have significant main effects on voters’ homophily perceptions and voting intent. The moderating effects of voters’ own ethnicity, party identification and gender were also found to have statistically significant effects on voters’ homophily perceptions and voting intent. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AbdullahH. (2012, November10). With their big political win, the new American electorate has arrived. CNN website. Retrieved 1April2013, from http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/09/politics/demographic-political-power/index.html
2.
AbrajanoM.A., NaglerJ., & AlvarezR.M. (2005). A natural experiment of race-based and issue voting: The 2001 City of Los Angeles election. Political Research Quarterly, 58(2), 203–218.
3.
AllenJ.L., & PostD.J. (2004). Source valence in assessing candidate image in a local election. Communication Research Reports, 21(2), 174–187.
4.
AlvarezR.M., & BedollaL.G. (2003). The foundations of Latino voter partisanship: Evidence from the 2000 election. The Journal of Politics, 65(1), 31–49.
5.
AppiahO. (2001a). Black, white, Hispanic, and Asian American adolescents’ responses to culturally embedded ads. The Howard Journal of Communications, 12(1), 29–48.
6.
AppiahO. (2001b). Ethnic identification on adolescents’ evaluations of advertisements. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(5), 7–22.
7.
BailensonJ.N., GarlandP., IyengarS., & YeeN. (2006). Transformed facial similarity as a political cue: A preliminary investigation. Political Psychology, 27(3), 373–386.
8.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299.
9.
BrumbaughA.M. (2002). Source and nonsource cues in advertising and their effects on the activation of cultural and subcultural knowledge on the route to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 258–269.
10.
CampbellA., ConverseP.E., MillerM.E., & StokesD.E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
CappellaJ., JamiesonK.H., RomerD., & NurickN. (2000). Does political advertising affect turnout? If so, how, when, and for whom? In JamiesonK.H. (ed.), Everything you think you know about politics…and why you’re wrong (pp. 93–96). New York: Basic Books.
12.
ChaikenS. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766.
13.
ChaikenS., & EaglyA.H. (1983). Communicator modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 241–256.
14.
ChoJ. (2005). Media, interpersonal discussion, and electoral choice. Communication Research, 32(3), 295–322.
15.
ChristieL. (2009, May14). Hispanic population boom fuels rising U.S. diversity. Retrieved 10April2014, from http://articles.cnn.com/2009-05-14/us/money.census.diversity_1_hispanic-population-latinos-and-other-minority-pew-hispanic-center?_s=PM:US
16.
ConnaughtonS.L., & JarvisS.E. (2004). Apolitical politics: GOP efforts to foster identification from Latinos, 1984–2000. Communication Studies, 55(3), 464–480.
EliasT., AppiahO., & GongL. (2011). Effects of strength of ethnic identity and product presenter race on black consumer attitudes: A multiple-group model approach. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 11(2), Spring. Retrieved 4April2014, from http://jiad.org/article144
19.
FoxL. (2012, October26). Gallup predicts voter turnout will remain unchanged in 2012 election. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 3April2014, from http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/10/26/gallup-predicts-voter-turnout-will-remain-unchanged-in-2012-election
20.
FreyW.H. (2012, May). Why minorities will decide the 2012 U.S. election. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Retrieved 1April2014, from http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2012/05/01-race-elections-frey
21.
GlascockJ., & RuggieroT.E. (2004). Representations of class and gender on primetime Spanish-language television in the United States. Communication Quarterly, 52(4), 390–402.
22.
GlascockJ., & RuggieroT.E. (2006). The relationship of ethnicity and sex to professor credibility at a culturally diverse university. Communication Education, 55(2), 197–207.
23.
GreenC.L. (1999). Ethnic evaluations of advertising: Interaction effects of strength of ethnic identification, media placement, and degree of racial composition. Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 49–64.
24.
GreenbergS., & HoganM. (2004). Hispanics and the 2004 presidential elections. Democracy Corps. Retrieved 20April2014, from http://www.democracycorps.com/reports/analyses/Hispanics_and_the_2004_election.pdf
25.
GrierS.A., & BrumbaughA.M. (1999). Noticing cultural differences: Ad meanings created by target and non-target markets. Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 79–93.
26.
GroenendykE.W., & ValentinoN.A. (2002). Of dark clouds and silver linings: Effects of exposure to issue versus candidate advertising on persuasion, information retention, and issue salience. Communication Research, 29(3), 295–319.
27.
GrynaviskiJ.D. (2006). A Bayesian learning model with applications to party identification. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18(3), 323–346.
28.
HauL. (2007, December7). Political ad spending set to climb sharply. Forbes.com. Retrieved 29April2014, from http://www.forbes.com/2007/12/07/politics-campaign-spending-biz-media-cx_lh_1207bizpolitics.html
29.
HellwegS.A. (1979). An examination of voter conceptualization of the ideal political candidate. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 44(4), 373–85.
30.
HickeyW. (2012, December13). The total cost of the 2012 presidential race was astounding. Business Insider. Retrieved 3April2014, from http://www.businessinsider.com/election-cost-2-billion-2012-12
31.
HockingJ.E., StacksD.W., & McDermottS.T. (2003). Communication Research (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Educations, Inc.
32.
HollandJ., & GentryJ.W. (1999). Ethnic consumer reaction to targeted marketing: A theory of intercultural accommodation. Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 65–77.
33.
HumesK.R., JonesNicholas A., & RamirezR.R. (2011, March). Overview of race and Hispanic origins: 2010. Retrieved 1April2014, from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf
34.
HurstS.R. (2012, May3). Obama enjoys overwhelming Hispanic support in 2012 race. Retrieved 3April2014, from http://www.thegrio.com/politics/obama-enjoys-overwhelming-hispanic-support.php
35.
LatinoVoteMap.Org (2012, December10). Latino influence on 2012 election. Retrieved 1March2014, from http://www.latinovotemap.org/map/
36.
LazarsfeldP., & MertonR.K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In BergerM., AbelT. & PageC.H. (Eds), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). New York: Van Nostrand.
37.
LealD.L., BarretoM.A., LeeJ., & de la GarzaR.O. (2005). The Latino vote in the 2004 election. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(01), 41–49.
38.
Len–RíosM.E. (2002). The Bush and Gore Presidential Campaign web sites: Identifying with Hispanic voters during the 2000 Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary. J&MC Quarterly, 79(4), 887–904.
39.
Lewis-BeckM.S., JacobyW.G., NorpothH., & WeisbergH.F. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
40.
LopezM.H. (2008, November5). How Hispanic voted in the 2008 election. Retrieved 4March42014, from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1024/exit-poll-analysis-hispanics
41.
LopezM.H., & MinushkinS. (2008, July24). 2008 national survey of Latinos: Hispanic voter attitudes. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
42.
MaldonadoR., & MuehlingD.D. (2006). The effect of social identity cues under incidental ad exposure conditions. Journal of Promotion Management, 12(2), 77–91.
43.
MarksP. (2000, October31). The 2000 campaign: The spending on ads; Bush has advertised more in California than in Swing States. The New York Times, Retrieved 11August2015 from, http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/31/us/2000-campaign-spending-ads-bush-has-advertised-more-california-than-swing-states.html
44.
McCroskeyJ.C., RichmondV.P., & DalyJ.A. (1975). The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(4), 323–332.
45.
McCroskeyL.L., McCroskeyJ.C., & RichmondV.P. (2006). Analysis and improvement of the measurement of interpersonal attraction and homophily. Communication Quarterly, 54(1), 1–31.
46.
McllwainC.D. (2007, May). Racial identity, ideology, and the youth vote: Observations from the 2004 presidential campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), 1231–1238.
47.
RomerD., JamiesonJ.H., & CappellaJ. (2000). Does attack advertising affect turnout? In JamiesonK.H. (ed.), Everything you think you know about politics…and why you’re wrong (pp. 107–110). New York: Basic Books.
48.
RozinP. (2007). Exploring the landscape of modern academic psychology: Finding and filling the holes. American Psychologist, 62(8), 754–766.
49.
SiegelJ.T., AlvaroE.M., CranoW.D., LacA., TingS., & JonesS.P. (2008). A quasi-experimental investigation of message appeal variations on organ donor registration rates. Health Psychology, 27(2), 170–178.
50.
SimpsonE.M., SnuggsT., ChristiansenT., & SimplesK.E. (2000). Race, homophily, and purchase intentions and the black consumer. Psychology & Marketing, 17(10), 877–889.
51.
Subervi-VélezF. A. (1986). The mass media and ethnic assimilation and pluralism: A review and research proposal with special focus on Hispanics. Communication Research, 13(1), 71–96.
52.
Subervi-VélezF. A. (Ed.). (2008). The mass media and Latino politics: Studies of media content, campaign strategies and survey research: 1984–2004. New York: Routledge.
53.
Subervi-VélezF.A., & ConnaughtonS.L. (1999). Targeting the Latino vote: The Democratic party’s 1996 mass-communication strategy. In de la GarzaR.O. & DeSipioL. (eds), Awash in the mainstream: Latino politics in the 1996 elections (pp. 47–71). Boulder: Westview Press.
54.
TorresI.M., & BriggsE. (2007). Identification effects on advertising response: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Advertising, 36(3), 97–108.
55.
TorresI.M. & GelbB.D. (2002). Hispanic–targeted advertising: More sales?Journal of Advertising Research, 42(6), 69–75.
56.
ValentinoN.A., HutchingsV.L., & WhiteI.K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. The American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90.
57.
WhittlerT.E. (1989). Viewers’ processing of actor’s race and message claims in advertising stimuli. Psychology & Marketing, 6(4), 287–309.
58.
WhittlerT.E., & SpiraJ.S. (2002). Model’s race: A peripheral cue in advertising messages?Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(4), 291–301.
59.
YoonK., PinkletonB.E., & KoW. (2005). Effects of negative political advertising on voting intention: An exploration of the roles of involvement and source credibility in the development of voter cynicism. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11(2), 95–112.
