This article explores the views and experiences of schooling among parents of children with autism from middle-income families in urban India. A total of 18 parents with children attending private mainstream schools in Kolkata were interviewed about their school choice, interactions with the school and perceptions regarding their child’s schooling. The findings position parents as strategic agents, who actively negotiate a range of obstacles, resolve dilemmas and handle tensions to ensure their child’s admission and continuity in school. It was clear that parents shared a precarious and fragile relationship with the school. While parents were, on the face of it, positive about the school, parental accounts show how the school had not made any significant changes to accommodate the needs of their child. The article concludes by reflecting on the complexities inherent in these findings and questions why these agentic middle-class parents who could be the impetus of greater change seemed rather limited in the ways in which they sought the school to change to accommodate their child with disability.
Action for Autism. (2013). Autism in India. Retrieved from http://www.autism-india.org/ (accessed on 10 January 2013)
2.
ArcherL.FrancisB. (2007). Understanding minority ethnic achievement: Race, gender, class and ‘success’. London: Routledge.
3.
AshleyL.D. (2010). The use of structuration theory to conceptualize alternative practice in education: The case of private school outreach in India. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(3), 337–351. doi:10.1080/01425691003700599.
BrezisR.S.WeisnerT.S.DaleyT.C.SinghalN.BaruaM.CholleraS.P. (2015). Parenting a child with autism in India: Narratives before and after a parent–child intervention program. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 39(2), 277–298. doi:10.1007/s11013-015-9434-y.
6.
DaleyT.C. (2004). From symptom recognition to diagnosis: Children with autism in urban India. Social Science and Medicine, 58(7), 1323–1335.
7.
DasA.KattumuriR. (2011). Children with disabilities in private inclusive schools in Mumbai: Experiences and challenges. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 2(8). Retrieved from http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/ejie/vol2/iss8/7/ (accessed on 03 October 2012)
8.
DeA.KheraR.SamsonM.Shiva KumarA.K. (2011). PROBE revisited: A report on elementary education in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
9.
DonnerH. (2005). ‘Children are capital, grandchildren are interest’: Changing educational strategies and parenting in Calcutta’s middle-class families. In AssayagJ.FullerC. (Eds), Globalizing India: Perspectives from below (pp. 119–139). London: Anthem Press.
10.
DruryD. (1993). The iron schoolmaster: Education, employment, and the family in India. Delhi: Hindustan Pub. Co.
11.
EdwardrajS.MumtajK.PrasadJ.H.KuruvillaA.JacobK.S. (2010). Perceptions about intellectual disability: A qualitative study from Vellore, South India. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(8), 736–748. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01301.x.
12.
Ganguly-ScraseR.ScraseT.J. (2008). Globalisation and the middle classes in India: The social and cultural impact of neoliberal reforms. London: Routledge.
13.
GhaiA. (2015). Rethinking disability in India. New Delhi: Routledge.
14.
GilbertsonA. (2014). ‘Mugging up’ versus ‘exposure’: International schools and social mobility in Hyderabad, India. Ethnography and Education, 9(2), 210–223. doi:10.1080/17457823.2013.878512.
15.
HoojaV. (2009). Parents of students included in mainstream schools: A narrative exploration. In AlurM.TimmonsV. (Eds), Inclusive education across cultures: Crossing boundaries, sharing ideas (pp. 352–364). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
16.
JhaM.M. (2010). From special to inclusive education in India: Case studies of three schools in Delhi. Delhi: Pearson Education.
17.
KingdonG.G. (2007). The progress of school education in India. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(2), 168–195. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grm015.
18.
KrishnamurthyV. (2008). A clinical experience of autism in India. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 29(4), 331–333. doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181829f1f.
19.
KumarK. (2005). Political agenda of education: A study of colonialist and nationalist ideas. London: SAGE Publications.
MHRD. (2012). Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development. http://ssa.nic.in/ (accessed on 30 September 2012)
23.
MSJE. (1996). The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. Retrieved from http://socialjustice.nic.in/pwdact1995.php (accessed on 22 August 2011)
24.
MSJE. (1999). The National Trust for the Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs. Retrieved from www.thenationaltrust.co.in, (accessed on 22 August 2011) http://socialjustice.nic.in/pdf/ntact1999.pdf
NambissanG.B. (2010). The Indian middle classes and educational advantage: Family strategies and practices. In AppleM.W.BallS.J.GandinL.A. (Eds), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 285–295). London: Routledge.
27.
NeumanW.L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
28.
NewschafferC.J.CroenL.A.DanielsJ.GiarelliE.GretherJ.K.LevyS.E.MandellD.S.MillerL.A.Pinto-MartinJ.ReavenJ.ReynoldsA.M.RiceC.E.SchendelD.WindhamG.C. (2007). The epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders. Annual Review of Public Health, 28(1), 235–258. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144007.
29.
RaoS. (2006). Parameters of normality and cultural constructions of ‘mental retardation’: Perspectives of Bengali families. Disability and Society, 21(2), 159–178. doi:10.1080/09687590500498127.
ReayD.BallS.J. (1998). ‘Making their minds up’: Family dynamics of school choice. British Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 431–448. doi:10.1080/0141192980240405.
32.
SandillA.SinghA. (2005). Inclusion: Some emerging directions in the Indian context. Paper presented at the Inclusive and Supportive Education Congress 2005, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
33.
SingalN. (2008). Working towards inclusion: Reflections from the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(6), 1516–1529. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.01.008.
34.
SingalN. (2010). Doing disability research in a Southern context: Challenges and possibilities. Disability and Society, 25(4), 415–426. doi:10.1080/09687591003755807.
35.
SingalN.JefferyR. (2011). Inclusive education in India: The struggle for quality in consonance with equity. In ArtilesA.J.KozleskiE.B.WaitollerF.R. (Eds), Inclusive education: Examining equity on five continents (pp. 161–183). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
36.
SingalN.JefferyR.JainA.SoodN. (2011). The enabling role of education in the lives of young people with disabilities in India: Achieved and desired outcomes. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(10), 1205–1218. doi:10.1080/13603116.2011.555076.
37.
SrivastavaP. (2008). School choice in India: Disadvantaged groups and low-fee private schools. In ForseyM.DaviesS.WalfordG. (Eds), The globalisation of school choice? (pp. 185–208). Oxford: Symposium Books.
38.
SrivastavaP.NoronhaC. (2014). Early private school responses to India’s Right to Education Act: Implications for equity. In MacphersonI.R.G.RobertsonS.L.WalfordG. (Eds), Education, privatisation and social justice: Case studies from Africa, South Asia and South East Asia (pp. 179–198). Oxford: Symposium Books.
39.
Taneja JohanssonS. (2014). “He is intelligent but different”: Stakeholders’ perspectives on children on the autism spectrum in an urban Indian school context. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61(4), 416–433. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2014.955786.
40.
VaidyaS. (2008). A sociological study of families of autistic children in Delhi. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Centre for the Study of Social Systems, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
41.
Vetenskapsrådet. (2002). Forskningsetiska Principer Inom Humanistisk- Samhällsvetenskaplig Forskning. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
42.
VincentC.MenonR. (2011). The educational strategies of the middle classes in England and India. In LallM.C.NambissanG.B. (Eds), Education and social justice in the era of globalisation: Perspectives from India and the UK (pp. 56–80). London/New York: Routledge.
43.
WaldropA. (2004). The meaning of the old school-tie: Private schools, admission procedures and class segmentation in New Delhi. In Vaugier-ChatterjeeA. (Ed.), Education and democracy in India (pp. 203–228). New Delhi: Manohar and Centre de Sciences Humaines.
44.
WingL. (2007). Children with autism spectrum disorders. In CigmanR. (Ed.), Included or excluded? The challenge of the mainstream for some SEN children (pp. 23–33). London: Routledge.
