Roads are bitumen covered concrete metaphors of modernity and development, and they materially represent fantasies, collective hopes, and aspirations of future(s). They symbolize movement, connectivity, transactions and transportation, and eminently reflect governmentality. Our article is about Manipur’s connective infrastructures, and it focuses on internal roads, and a border highway that connects Imphal (Manipur’s capital city) to Dimapur at Nagaland in North-east India. We explain the infrastructural deficit within Manipur and decision-making about them being influenced by a hill-valley socio-ecological ethnic distributional conflict. The road links and is part of the uneven development route. We provide an ethnographic account of a truck journey undertaken between Imphal and Dimapur in 2018, and this enables us to understand routinized corruption and the collusion of state and non-state actors therein. The road is the symbol of hope, and a developmental desire, and epitomizes state’s governmentality and developmental project of progress, nonetheless it also gets transformed into the central locale of political protest, ethnic conflict when ethnic groups appropriate it forcibly to erect blockades and organize protests in its arterial space. The roads and highways spatially produce and reproduce (il)legality, (il)legibility, and (il)legitimacy of the Indian state. Our ethnographic research unpacks and invokes the multivalence of roads.
AnandN. (2015). Leaky states: Water audits, ignorance, and the politics of infrastructure. Public Culture, 27(2), 305–330.
2.
AnandN. (2017). Hydraulic city: Water and the infrastructures of citizenship in Mumbai. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
3.
AnjariaJ. S. (2011). Ordinary states: Everyday corruption and the politics of space in Mumbai. American Ethnologist, 38(1), 58–72.
4.
AppelH. (2018). Infrastructural time. In AnandN., GuptaA., & AppelH. (Eds.), The promise of infrastructure (pp. 41–60). Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
5.
AppelH., AnandN., & GuptaA. (2015). Introduction: The infrastructure toolbox. Cultural Anthropology, 24. Retrieved from https://staging.culanth.org/fieldsights/introduction-the-infrastructure-toolbox
6.
AppelH., AnandN., & GuptaA. (2018). Introduction: Temporality, politics and the promise of infrastructure. In AnandN., GuptaA., & AppelH. (Eds.), The promise of infrastructure (pp. 1–38). Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
7.
AroraV. (2007). Assertive identities, indigeneity, and the politics of recognition as a tribe: The Bhutias, the Lepchas and the Limbus of Sikkim. Sociological Bulletin, 56(2), 195–220.
8.
AroraV. (2009). ‘They are all set to dam (n) our future’: Contested development through hydel power in democratic Sikkim. Sociological Bulletin, 58(1), 94–114.
9.
AroraV. (2013). The paradox of democracy in the Northeast and the eastern Himalayas. In AroraV. & JayaramN. (Eds.), Routeing democracy in the Himalayas: Experiments and experiences (pp. 101–132). Delhi, India: Routledge.
10.
AroraV., & KipgenN. (2012a). The politics of identifying with and distancing from Kuki identity in Manipur. Sociological Bulletin, 61(3), 429–449.
11.
AroraV., & KipgenN. (2012b). ‘We can live without power, but we can’t live without our land’: Indigenous Hmar oppose the Tipaimukh dam in Manipur. Sociological Bulletin, 61(1), 109–128.
12.
AroraV., & KipgenN. (2017). Demand for Kukiland and Kuki ethnic nationalism. In AroraV. & JayaramN. (Eds.), Democratisation in the Himalayas (pp. 161–185). Delhi, India: Routledge.
13.
BaruahS. (2009). Beyond counter-insurgency: Breaking the impasse in northeast India. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
14.
CarseA. (2012). Nature as infrastructure: Making and managing the Panama Canal watershed. Social Studies of Science, 42(4), 539–563.
15.
Census of India (2011). Census of Manipur: Population totals. Retrieved from https://www.census2011.co.in/census/state/manipur.html
16.
DalakoglouD. (2012). ‘The road from capitalism to capitalism’: Infrastructures of (post) socialism in Albania. Mobilities, 7(4), 571–586.
17.
DuttaA., & SuykensB. (2017). Constellations of power and authority in the political economy of illegal timber extraction in BTAD, Assam. Alternatives, 42(3), 146–165.
18.
EdwardsN. P. (2003). Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In MisaT. J. & BreyP. (Eds.), Modernity and technology (pp. 185–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
EscobarA. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
FairheadJ. (1992). Paths of authority: Roads, the state and the market in eastern Zaire. The European Journal of Development Research, 4(2), 17–35.
21.
FoucaultM. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Government of India (2009). District infrastructure index for North Eastern region. New Delhi, India: Ministry for Development of Northeastern Region.
23.
Government of Manipur (2014). Annual report 2013–14. Imphal, India: Public Works Department.
24.
GuptaA. (1995). Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist, 22(2), 375–402.
25.
GuptaA. (2015). An anthropology of electricity from the Global South. Cultural Anthropology, 30(4), 555–568.
26.
GuptaA. (2018). The future in ruins: Thoughts on the temporality of infrastructure. In AnandN., GuptaA., & AppelH. (Eds.), The promise of infrastructure (pp. 62–79). Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
27.
HaksarN. (2016). The exodus is not over: Migrations from the ruptured homelands of northeast India. Delhi, India: Speaking Tiger.
28.
HaokipT. (2015). The politics of Scheduled Tribe status in Manipur. Society and Culture in South Asia, 1(1), 82–89.
29.
HarveyP. (2018). Infrastructures in and out of time: The promise of roads in contemporary Peru. In AnandN., GuptaA., & AppelH. (Eds.), The promise of infrastructure (pp. 80–101). Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
30.
HarveyP., & KnoxH. (2015). Roads: An anthropology of infrastructure and expertise. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
HazarikaS. (2018). Strangers no more: New narratives from India’s Northeast. Delhi, India: Aleph Book Company.
32.
JilangambaY. (2015). Beyond the ethno-territorial binary: Evidencing the hill and valley peoples in Manipur. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 38(2), 276–289.
33.
KameiR. (2018). Tribal land, customary law, and the Manipur land revenue and land reforms act. Economic and Political Weekly, 53(19), 52–56.
34.
KarlssonB. G. (2011). Unruly hills: Nature and nation in India’s Northeast. New Delhi, India: Orient Blackswan.
35.
KarlssonB. G., & KikonD. (2017). Wayfinding: Indigenous migrants in the service sector of metropolitan India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 40(3), 447–462.
36.
KikonD. (2009). The predicament of justice: Fifty years of armed forces special powers act in India. Contemporary South Asia, 17(3), 271–282.
37.
KikonD., & McDuie-RaD. (2017). English-language documents and old trucks: Creating infrastructure in Nagaland’s coal mining villages. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 40(4), 772–791.
38.
KipgenN., & AroraV. (2011). Contemporary poverty alleviation policies and the historical marginalization of the Kukis in Manipur, India. In LatherA. S., SainiA. K., & KhatriP. (Eds.), Strategies and innovations for sustainable organizations (pp. 423–436). Delhi, India: Macmillan Publications.
39.
KipgenN., & Roy ChowdhuryA. (2016). ‘Contested state-craft’ on the frontiers of the Indian nation: ‘Hills–valley divide’ and the genealogy of Kuki ethnic nationalism in Manipur. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 16(2), 283–303.
40.
LarkinB. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 327–342.
41.
LarkinB. (2018). Promising forms: The political aesthetics of infrastructure. In AnandN., GuptaA., & AppelH. (Eds.), The promise of infrastructure (pp. 175–202). Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
42.
MathurN. (2017). Eating money: Corruption and its categorical ‘other’ in the leaky Indian state. Modern Asian Studies, 51(6), 1796–1817.
43.
McDuie-RaD. (2009). Fifty-year disturbance: The armed forces special powers act and exceptionalism in a South Asian periphery. Contemporary South Asia, 17(3), 255–270.
44.
McDuie-RaD. (2014). Ethnicity and place in a ‘disturbed city’: Ways of belonging in Imphal, Manipur. Asian Ethnicity, 15(3), 374–393.
45.
MDoner (2008). North Eastern region vision 2020 (Vol. 1). New Delhi, India: Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region.
46.
MDoner (2009). District infrastructure index for North Eastern region. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Development for North Eastern Region.
47.
MeeteiN. B. (2017). Emerging trends in ethnic nationalism: Territoriality and conflict in Manipur. History and Sociology of South Asia, 11(1), 55–67.
48.
MitchellT. (1991). The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review, 85(1), 77–96.
49.
RahmanM. Z. (2019). ‘Pickled’ infrastructure and connectivity: Locating community engagement in Northeast India’s infrastructural transformation. Heinrich Boll Stiftung. Retrieved from https://in.boell.org/sites/default/files/uploads/2019/06/pickled_infrastructure_and_connectivity_locating_community_engagement_in_northeast_indias_infrastructural_transformation.pdf
50.
ReevesM. (2017). Infrastructural hope: Anticipating ‘independent roads’ and territorial integrity in southern Kyrgyzstan. Ethnos, 82(4), 711–737.
51.
Roluahpuia (2016). Media in conflict or conflict in media: Examining media coverage of conflict in Northeast India. Asian Ethnicity, 18(4), 488–504.
52.
ScottJ. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
SharmaS. K. (2019). The complexity called Manipur: Roots, perceptions and reality. Delhi, India: Viva Books.
54.
StarS. L., & RuhlederK. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.
55.
SuanH. K. K. (2011). Hill-valley divide as a site of conflict: Emerging dialogic space in Manipur. In BaruahS. (Eds.), Beyond counter-insurgency: Breaking the impasse in Northeast India (pp. 263–289). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
56.
SyiemliehD. R. (2014). Introduction. In SyiemliehD. (Eds.), On the edge of empire: Four British plans for North East India, 1941–1947 (pp. 1–43). Delhi, India: SAGE Publications.
VagholikarN., & DasP. J. (2010). Damming Northeast India. Pune/Guwahati/New Delhi, India: Kalpavriksh, Aaranyak and Action Aid India.
59.
Van SpengenW. (2000). Tibetan border worlds: A geo-historical analysis of trade and traders. London, UK: Routledge.
60.
WilsonF. (2004). Towards a political economy of roads: Experiences from Peru. Development and Change, 35(3), 525–546.
61.
WoutersJ. J. (2018). In the shadows of Naga insurgency: Tribes, state, and violence in Northeast India. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
62.
ZiipaoR. R. (2016). Infrastructure development in Manipur: A study in social dynamics (Unpublished PhD thesis). School of Social Sciences, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India.
63.
ZiipaoR. R. (2018). Look/Act east policy, roads and market infrastructure in NorthEast India. Strategic Analysis, 42(5), 476–489.
