Examining the changes in production relations in one of the poorest rainfed belts in India, this study, based on field surveys in eight villages in Kalahandi and Nuapada districts of Odisha, unravels the complexities of the transition in agriculture. The introduction of irrigation has resulted in, an increase in yield, wage rates and labour-use per hectare. Comparison between the irrigated and the non-irrigated villages also suggest a drastic reduction in poverty and distress seasonal out-migration. The average household income in the irrigated villages turns out to be more than three times that of the rainfed villages. Thus, irrigation has acted as a key driver of agrarian change, and its role in creating labour demand in agriculture continues to be significant. However, the reduced control of marginalised sections over land, the significance of sharecropping in the irrigated villages, the high share of family labour in total labour-use among the marginal and small cultivators in the irrigated region, and moreover, the continued presence of labour-tying suggest that, the transformation involves several complexities, particularly in terms of the newly emerging labour relations.
AhmedI. (1976). The green revolution and tractorisation-their mutual relations and socio-economic effects. International Labour Review, 114(1), 83–94.
2.
AmbagudiaJ. (2010). Tribal rights, dispossession and the state in Orissa. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(33), 60–67.
3.
BardhanP. (1973). Size, productivity, and returns to scale: An analysis of farm-level data in Indian agriculture. Journal of Political Economy, 81(6), 1370–1386.
4.
BardhanP. (1983). Labour-tying in a poor agrarian economy: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3), 501–514.
5.
BardhanP.RudraA. (1981). Terms and conditions of labour contracts in agriculture: Results of a survey in West Bengal 1979. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 43(1), 89–111.
6.
BasoleA.BasuD. (2011). Relations of production and modes of surplus extraction in India: Part I-agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(14), 41–58.
7.
BhallaG. S.ChadhaG. K. (1983). Green revolution and the small peasant: A study of income distribution among Punjab cultivators. New Delhi, India: Concept Publishing Company.
8.
BhallaG. S.ChadhaG. K.KashyapS. P.SharmaR. K. (1990). Agricultural growth and structural changes in the Punjab economy: An input-output analysis. Research Report No. 82, IFPRI and CSRD/JNU. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
9.
ChadhaG. K. (1978). Farm size and productivity revisited—Some notes from recent experience of Punjab. Economic and Political Weekly, 13(9), A87–A96.
10.
ChandR.PrasannaP. L.SinghA. (2011). Farm size and productivity: Understanding the strengths of smallholders and improving their livelihoods. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(26–27), 5–11.
11.
ChattopadhyayM. (1984). Transformations of labour use in Indian agriculture. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8(3), 289–296.
12.
ChoudharyS.GuptaN. (2008). Levels of living and poverty patterns: A district-wise analysis for India. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(90), 94–110.
13.
CurrieB. (2000). The politics of hunger in India: A study of democracy, governance and Kalahandi’s poverty. New Delhi, India: Macmillan.
14.
Da CortaL.VenkateshwarluD. (1999). Unfree relations and the feminisation of agricultural labour in Andhra Pradesh, 1970–95. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 26 (2–3), 71–139.
15.
DasS.SethR. (2014). Exclusion and exploitation of migrants workers in Brick-Kilns: A micro study of a backward region in Odisha. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 16(2), 290–321.
16.
de HaanA. (2011). Inclusive growth, labour migration and poverty in India. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 54(3), 387–410.
17.
DrezeJ.KheraR. (2011). The battle for employment guarantee. In KheraR. (Ed.), The battle for employment guarantee (pp. 43–81). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
18.
DyerG. D. (1996). The logic of peasant agriculture under semi Feudalism. Journal of Peasant Studies, 24(1–2), 103–131.
19.
GriffinK. (1974). The political economy of Agrarian change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
GriffinK. (1976). Land concentration and rural poverty. London, UK: Macmillan.
KunduA.ChakrabartiS. (2010). Non-agricultural informal sector in India: Impacts of Agrarian conditions. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 53(2), 199–224.
27.
LercheJ. (2011). Agrarian crisis and Agrarian questions in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(1), 104–118.
28.
LercheJ. (2013). The Agrarian question in neoliberal India: Agrarian transition bypassed?Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(3), 382–404.
29.
LercheJ.ShahA.Harriss-WhiteB. (2013). Introduction: Agrarian questions and left politics in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(3), 337–350.
30.
MahapatraL. K. (1997). Tribal rights to land and the state in Orissa. In PfefferG.BeheraD. K. (Eds.), Contemporary society: Social concern (Vol. 3, pp. 135–151). New Delhi, India: Concept Publishing Company.
31.
Ministry of Rural Development. (2012). MGNREGA Sameeksha: An anthology of research studies on MGNREGA 2005, 2006–2012. New Delhi, India: Orient Blackswan.
32.
MishraD. K. (2008). Structural inequalities and interlinked transactions in Agrarian markets: Results of a field survey. In BhaumikS. K. (Ed.), Reforming Indian agriculture: Towards employment generation and poverty reduction (pp. 231–268). New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications.
MishraD. K. (2016). Seasonal migration from Odisha: A field view. In MishraD. K. (Ed.), Internal migration in contemporary India (pp. 263–290). New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications.
35.
MishraD. K.Harriss-WhiteB. (2015). Mapping regions of Agrarian capitalism in India. In BasileE.Harriss-WhiteB.LutringerC. (Eds.), Mapping India’s capitalism: Old and new regions (pp. 9–41). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
MishraD.RaoR. S. (1992). Hunger in Kalahandi: Blinkered understanding. Economic and Political Weekly, 27(24–25), 1245–1246.
NCEUS. (2009). The challenge of employment in India: An informal sector perspective (Vol.1). New Delhi, India: NCEUS.
39.
PadhiS.PanigrahiN. (2011). Tribal movements and livelihoods: Recent developments in Orissa. CPRC-IIPA Working Paper (Vol. 51). Delhi: CPRC, Indian Institute of Public Administration.
40.
PatelR. R. (2015). Practice of tenancy in an irrigated and unirrigated region: A case of undivided Kalahandi district, Odisha. In FaiziA. A.Gopal IyerK.KaurA. (Eds.), Tenancy laws and practices: Emerging issues (pp. 189–210). New Delhi, India: Manak.
41.
PrahladacharM. (1983). Income distribution effects of the green revolution in India: A review of empirical evidence. World Development, 11(11), 927–944.
42.
RaoJ. M. (1999). Agrarian power and unfree labour. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 26(2–3), 242–262.
43.
RaoC. H. (2005). Agriculture growth, farm size and rural poverty in India: Selected papers. New Delhi, India: Academic Foundation.
44.
RoyP. L. (1981). Transition in agriculture: Empirical indicators and results (Evidence from Punjab, India). Journal of Peasant Studies, 8(2), 212–241.
45.
RudraA. (1987). Labour relations in contrasts. Economic and Political Weekly, 22(17), 757–759.
46.
RudraA.SenA. (1980). Farm size and labour use: Analysis and policy. Economic and Political Weekly, 15(5–7), 391–394.
47.
SarapK. (1991). Changing contractual arrangement in agriculture labour market: Evidence from Orissa. Economic and Political Weekly, 26(52), A167–A176.
48.
SinghI. (1989). Reverse tenancy in Punjab agriculture: Impact of technological change. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(25), A86–A92.
49.
UNDP-India. (2010). Right based development policy as development policy: Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act. Discussion Paper 2, New Delhi.
50.
VattaK.SidhuR. S. (2010). Rural non-farm employment and income distribution: Micro level evidence from Punjab. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(4), 693–709.
