The labour process of the Hyundai Motor can be described as follows; a break from extreme Taylorist division of labour, but not necessarily from Fordism. The Fordist mass production continues to be implemented or modified in distinctive ways in a unique Korean economic environment. In other words, new forms of the labour process are invariably modifications of pre-existing ones, adopted to suit local contexts. If certain conditions or contexts are contradictory to a new form of production method, it is unlikely to survive.
AltshulerAAndersonM (1984), The Future of the Automobile, Cambridge, Mass; MIT PRESS
2.
BelloW (1992) I Dragons in Distress, Penguin, London
3.
WeekBusiness, (1988), ‘Hyundai Cars in the USA, Ready for a Second Take over
4.
CrossM (1985), ‘Flexible Manning’ inClutterbuckD (eds), New Patterns of Work, Aldershot, Gower
5.
ChoH, The Prospectε of the korean Motor Industry, Seoul Univ. Press, Seoul
6.
HolmesJ (1987), Technical Changes and the Restructuring of North Ameria automobile industry, Oxford, Basil
7.
HymanR C (1988) □□Flexible Specialisation; Miracle or Myth, in HymanCeds)
8.
HyunYA (1989), Technology Strategy for the korean industry, paper prepared for international Motor Project, Acapulco
9.
KamataS (1982), Japan in Passing Lane, London, Pantheon
10.
KaplinskyR, (1984) Automation, Harlow, Longman
11.
KaplinskyR (1988), Restructuring of the Capitalist Labour Process; some Lesson from Car Industry, Cambridge Journal of Economicsno 12
12.
PioreMSabelC (1984), The Second Industrial Divide; Possibility for Prosperity, New York, Basic Books
13.
PollertA (1981), The Flexible Firm; a Model in Search of RealitY<or a Policy in search of a Pratices?, Warwick Paper in Industrial Relations
14.
PollertA (1988), □□From Core- Periphery, to Flexible Specilisation’, paper presented at Conference on the Labour Process, Aston-UMIST
15.
SayersA (1986), New Developments in Manufacturing; Just-in-Time system, Capital and Class, N030
16.
SmithC (1987), Flexible Specialisation and Ealier Critiques of Mass Production, paper presented at Conference the Labour Process, ASTON-UMIST
17.
TollidaySZeitlinJ (1992), □□Introduction; between Fordism and Flexibility□□ inTollidaySZeitlineJ eds Between Fordism and Flexibility, Oxford, Basil Blackwell
18.
TurnbullP (1987), The Limits to Japanisation; Just in Time, Labour Relations and the Uk Automotive Industry, paper presented at the conference on Japanisation of British Industry, UWIST
19.
William (1987), The End of Mass Production?Economy and Society, Vol 16No. 3
20.
ThompsonP (1989), The Nature of Work, Macmillan Education LTD, London
21.
Wood (1989), the Transformation of Work, London, Hutchinson
