Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article attempts to analyze the roles and functions of local government for rural development in Thailand. Based on the research, findings indicate that Tambon Administrative Organizations (TAOs), the local government at the bottom level of the rural areas, in Phitsanulok province had received insufficient budget from the government authorities. Consequently, TAOs are unable to effectively deliver public services as per the expectations of the people. A need arises to review the responsibilities assigned to the TAOs and readjust the activities for making the TAOs more functional beyond undertaking routine activities. To achieve local development through TAOs, Central Government needs to redefine the tasks with adequate financial support, simultaneously augmenting the staffing situation with professional and management skills.

Keywords

Local government rural development Tambon Administrative Organization (TAO)Thailand

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amornvivat

2004. ‘Fiscal Decentralization: The Case of Thailand’. http://www.econ.hit-u.ac.jp/~kokyo/APPPsympo04/FiscDect%20_Thailand.pdf (accessed on 29 September 2012).

Baland

Platteau

1996. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is there Role for Rural Communities? Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bardhan

Mookherjee

2008. Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing Countries. A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Blair

2000. ‘Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries’, World Development, 28 (1): 21–39.

Channa

Faguet

J.P.

2012. ‘Decentralization of Health and Education in Developing Countries: A Quality-adjusted Review of the Empirical Literature’. Economic Organization and Public Policy Discussion Papers. EOPP 38. STICERD, London, UK.

Curtis

1991. Beyond Government: Organizations for Common Benefit. London: MacMillan.

Douglas

D.J.A.

2005. ‘The Restructuring of Local Government in Rural Regions: A Rural Development Perspective’, Journal of Rural Studies, 21(2): 231–46.

Esman

Uphoff

1984. Local Organizations: Intermediaries in Rural Development. New York: Cornell University Press.

Faguet

2014. ‘Decentralization and Governance’, World Development, 53: 2–13.

10.

Falkowski

2013. ‘Political Accountability and Governance in Rural areas Areas: Some Evidence from the Pilot Programme LEADER in Poland’, Journal of Rural Studies, 32: 70–79.

11.

Ghai

Vivian

J. M.

1992. Grassroot Environmental Action: People Participation in Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.

12.

Ghuman

B.S.

Singh

2013. ‘Decentralization and Delivery of Public Services in Asia’, Policy and Society, 32 (1): 7–21.

13.

Grindle

M.S.

2009. Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization and the Promise of Good Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

14.

Hsieh

Erh-Rou Lai

. 1999. The Role of Local Institutions in Rural Community Development: Country Papers. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo.

15.

Huther

Shah

1999. Applying a Single Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralization. Washington, DC: World Bank.

16.

Joanis

2014. ‘Shared Accountability and Partial Decentralization in Local Public Good Provision’, Journal of Development Economics, 107: 28–37.

17.

Korten

(ed.) 1987. Community Management: Asian Experiences and Perspectives. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

18.

Krueathep

2006. ‘Understanding Fiscal Strategies of Local Government in Thailand During the Time of Changes: Preliminary Findings’. Workshop on Improving Local Public Services in Thailand, Phuket, Thailand.

19.

Opare

2007. ‘Strengthening Community-based Organizations for the Challenges of Rural Development’, Community Development Journal, 42 (2): 251–64.

20.

Rowland

A.M.

2001. ‘Population as a Determinant of Local Outcomes under Decentralization: Illustrations from Small Municipalities in Bolivia and Mexico’, World Development, 29 (8): 1373–89.

21.

Weingast

2014. ‘Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: Political Aspects of Decentralization and Economic Development’, World Development, 53: 14–25.

22.

Wibbels

2006. ‘Madision in Baghdad? Decentralization and Federalism in Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 9: 165–88.

23.

World Bank. 2004. Making Services Work for Poor People. World Development Report, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Local Government for Rural Development in Thailand

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References