Starting 2015, the Indian banking regulator conducted clean-up exercise of banks’ balance sheets—aka asset quality review (AQR). This clean-up drive came along with a divergence disclosure, which captures the deviation in asset quality between the regulator and the bank’s assessment. We exploit this natural experiment to tease out the causal impact of divergence disclosure on risk-taking behavior in the presence of two counter-appealing theories: “market discipline” and “debt overhang.” Our results show that divergence disclosures do not discipline banks but rather amplify risk-taking behavior.
AcharyaV., & SteffenS. (2014). Benchmarking the European Central Bank’s asset quality review and stress test: A tale of two leverage ratios. NYU Stern School of Business.
2.
AcharyaV. V. (2017). The unfinished agenda: Restoring public sector bank health in India (Remarks delivered during the 8th RK Talwar Memorial Lecture organized by the Indian Institute of Banking and Finance).
3.
AkerlofG. (1970). The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 485–500.
4.
AndriesA. M., CocrisV., & PlescauI. (2015). Low interest rates and bank risk-taking: Has the crisis changed anything? Evidence from the Eurozone. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 8(1), 125–148.
5.
AttardL. (2016). Asset quality review: Its impact on the banking system in Malta. University of Malta.
6.
BahriF., & HamzaT. (2020). The impact of market power on bank risk-taking: An empirical investigation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11, 1198–1233.
7.
BardhanS., SharmaR., & MukherjeeV. (2019). Threshold effect of bank-specific determinants of non-performing assets: An application in Indian banking. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 18(Suppl 1), S1–S34.
8.
BascleG. (2008). Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 6(3), 285–327.
9.
BashirU., KhanS., JonesA., & HussainM. (2021). Do banking system transparency and market structure affect financial stability of Chinese banks?Economic Change and Restructuring, 54, 1–41.
10.
Ben-DavidI., PalviaA. A., & StulzR. M. (2019). Distressed banks, debt overhang, and regulation. American Economic Association. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2020/preliminary/paper/hz2zkNs2
11.
BenstonG. J. (n.d.). Market discipline: The role of uninsured depositors and other market participants. Conference Series, Federal Reserve Bank of Scotland.
12.
BholatD., LastraR. M., MarkoseS. M., MiglionicoA., & SenK. (2018). Non-performing loans at the dawn of IFRS 9: Regulatory and accounting treatment of asset quality. Journal of Banking Regulation, 19, 33–54.
13.
BlissR. R., & FlanneryM. J. (2002). Market discipline in the governance of US bank holding companies: Monitoring vs. influencing. Review of Finance, 6(3), 361–396.
14.
BoydJ. H., GrahamS. L., & HewittR. S. (1993). Bank holding company mergers with nonbank financial firms: Effects on the risk of failure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 17(1), 43–63.
15.
Brandao-MarquesL., CorreaR., & SaprizaH. (2020). Government support, regulation, and risk taking in the banking sector. Journal of Banking & Finance, 112, 105284.
16.
ChiaramonteL., LiuH., PoliF., & ZhouM. (2016). How accurately can Z-score predict bank failure?Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 25(5), 333–360.
17.
ChopraY., SubramanianK., & TantriP. L. (2021). Bank cleanups, capitalization, and lending: Evidence from India. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(9), 4132–4176.
18.
DiamondD. W., & HeZ. (2014). A theory of debt maturity: The long and short of debt overhang. The Journal of Finance, 69(2), 719–762.
19.
FlanneryM. J. (2001). The faces of “market discipline.”Journal of Financial Services Research, 20(2–3), 107–119.
20.
FlanneryM. J., & BlissR. R. (2019). Market discipline in regulation: Pre-and post-crisis. In BergerA. N. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of banking (3rd ed., pp. 736–775). Oxford Academic.
21.
GodlewskiC. J. (2006). Regulatory and institutional determinants of credit risk taking and a bank’s default in emerging market economies: A two-step approach. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 5(2), 183–206.
22.
GroppR., GruendlC., & GuettlerA. (2014). The impact of public guarantees on bank risk-taking: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Finance, 18(2), 457–488.
23.
GrosD. (2013). The asset quality review and capital needs: Why re-capitalize banks with public money?CEPS Policy Brief, 311, 1–7.
24.
GuptaJ., & KashiramkaS. (2020). Financial stability of banks in India: Does liquidity creation matter?Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 64, 101439.
25.
HristovI. (2018). Will the review of asset quality do banks in the EU more stable? New knowledge. Journal of Science, 7(3), 33–42.
26.
JensenM. C., & MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
27.
JiménezG., LopezJ. A., & SaurinaJ. (2013). How does competition affect bank risk-taking?Journal of Financial Stability, 9(2), 185–195.
28.
KaracadagC., & ShrivastavaA. (2000). The role of subordinated debt in market discipline: The case of emerging markets (IMF Working Paper No. 00/215).
29.
KeeleyM. C. (1990). Deposit insurance, risk, and market power in banking. The American Economic Review, 80(5), 1183–1200.
30.
LaevenL., & LevineR. (2007). Corporate governance, regulation, and bank risk taking (World Bank Working Paper).
31.
LaevenL., & LevineR. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259–275.
32.
MertonR. C. (1977). An analytic derivation of the cost of deposit insurance and loan guarantees an application of modern option pricing theory. Journal of Banking & Finance, 1(1), 3–11.
33.
MishraB. K., & RamanaL. V. (2018). Does ownership structure influence bank performance? Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 17(Suppl 2), S282–S297.
34.
MyersS. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175.
35.
PolatoM., & BeltrameF. (2019). Bank’s asset quality review using debt service coverage ratio: An empirical investigation across European firms. In GualandriE., VenturelliV., & SclipA. (Eds.), Frontier Topics in Banking: Investigating New Trends and Recent Developments in the Financial Industry (225–244). Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
RajanR. G. (2006). Has finance made the world riskier?European Financial Management, 12(4), 499–533.
37.
RizviN. U., KashiramkaS., & SinghS. (2018). Basel I to Basel III: Impact of credit risk and interest rate risk of banks in India. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 17(Suppl 1), S83–S111.
38.
SrairiS. (2019). Transparency and bank risk-taking in GCC Islamic banking. Borsa Istanbul Review, 19, S64–S74.
39.
SteffenS. (2014). Robustness, validity and significance of the ECB’s asset quality review and stress test exercise. House of Finance.
40.
StephanouC. (2010). Rethinking market discipline in banking: Lessons from the financial crisis. (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5227).
41.
StockJ. H., & YogoM. (2002). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression (NBER Working Paper No. t0284).
42.
SwamiO. S., NethajiB., & SharmaJ. P. (2022). Determining risk factors that diminish asset quality of Indian commercial banks. Global Business Review, 23(2), 372–384.
43.
TantriP. (2021). Identifying ever-greening: Evidence using loan-level data. Journal of Banking & Finance, 122, 105997.
44.
Van GreuningH., & IqbalZ. (2008). Risk analysis for Islamic banks. World Bank Publications.
45.
WheelockD. C., & KumbhakarS. C. (1995). Which banks choose deposit insurance? Evidence of adverse selection and moral hazard in a voluntary insurance system. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(1), 186–201.
