The purpose of this study is to empirically test the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the actual buying behaviour of Indian consumers. For this purpose, responses were collected from 378 Indian consumers. To examine the possible relationship, descriptive statistics and regression are used. The result shows that purchase intention, intended loyalty, and consumers’ trust of socially responsible firms have a positive impact on consumers’ actual buying behaviour. Furthermore, this study highlights that intended loyalty towards a socially responsible firm has a profound influence on the actual buying behaviour of Indian consumers. An immediate managerial implication of the findings suggests that to attract potential consumers, CSR should be integrated with consumers’ marketing mix, given that CSR pays off in the form of better consumer response.
MaqboolS, BakrA. The curvilinear relationship between corporate social performance and financial performance. J Glob Responsib. 2019Mar8. doi: 10.1108/JGR-11-2018-0060
2.
SastryT. Exploring the role of business in society. IIMB Manage Rev. 2011Dec1; 23(4):246–256.
3.
BowenHRJohnsonFE. Social responsibility of the businessman. New York, NY: Harper; 1953.
4.
CarrollABShabanaKM. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. Int J Manage Rev.2010Mar; 12(1):85–105.
5.
MintzbergH.The case for corporate social responsibility. J Bus Strateg. 1983Oct1; 4(2):3.
6.
CreyerEH, RossJr WT. Tradeoffs between price and quality: How a value index affects. J Consum Aff. 1997Dec; 31(2):280–302.
7.
BrownTJ, DacinPA. The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. J Mark. 1997Jan; 61(1):68–84.
8.
HandelmanJM, ArnoldSJ. The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. J Mark. 1999Jul; 63(3):33–48.
9.
DavidsM.The champion of corporate social responsibility. 1990; Bus Soc Rev7440–43.
10.
CrowtherD.Corporate social reporting: Genuine action or window dressing. In: CrowtherD, Rayman-BacchusL, editors. Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. Farnham: Ashgate; 2004. pp.140–160.
11.
PisaniN, KourulaA, KolkA, MeijerR. How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review. J World Bus. 2017Sep1; 52(5):591–614.
12.
MitchellRK, AgleBR, WoodDJ. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev. 1997Oct1; 22(4):853–886.
13.
QuaziAM, O’brienD. An empirical test of a cross-national model of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics. 2000May1; 25(1):33–51.
14.
BhattacharyaCB, SenS. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. Calif Manage Rev. 2004Oct; 47(1):9–24.
15.
Haddock-FraserJE, TourelleM. Corporate motivations for environmental sustainable development: Exploring the role of consumers in stakeholder engagement. Bus Strateg Environ. 2010Dec; 19(8):527–542.
16.
MaignanI. Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. J Bus Ethics. 2001Mar1; 30(1):57–72.
17.
PradhanS. Role of CSR in the Consumer Decision-making Process. Soc Responsib J.2018Jan1; 14(1):138–158.
18.
RahimRA, JalaludinFW, TajuddinK. The importance of corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour in Malaysia. Asian Acad Manage J.2011Jan; 16(1):119–139.
19.
MarinL, RuizS, RubioA. The role of identity salience in the effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. J Bus Ethics. 2009Jan1; 84(1):65–78.
OrelFD, KaraA. Supermarket self-checkout service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. J Retail Consum Serv. 2014Mar1; 21(2):118–129.
22.
SindhuMI, ArifM. Corporate social responsibility and loyalty: Intervening influence of customer satisfaction and trust. Cogent Bus Manage. 2017Jan1; 4(1):1396655.
23.
KleinJ, DawarN. Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. Int J Res in Mark. 2004Sep1; 21(3):203–217.
24.
VlachosPA. Corporate social performance and consumer-retailer emotional attachment. Eur J Mark. 2012Nov9; 46(11):1559–1580.
25.
GrozaMD, PronschinskeMR, WalkerM. Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. J Bus Ethics. 2011Sep1; 102(4):639–652.
26.
GattiL, CaruanaA, SnehotaI. The role of corporate social responsibility, perceived quality and corporate reputation on purchase intention: Implications for brand management. J Brand Manage. 2012Oct1; 20(1):65–76.
27.
CreyerEH, RossWT. The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Mark Lett. 1996Mar1; 7(2):173–185.
28.
SwaenV, ChumpitazRC. Impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust. Rech et Appl en Mark (English Edition). 2008Dec; 23(4):7–34.
29.
PivatoS, MisaniN, TencatiA. The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food. Bus Ethics: A Eur Rev. 2008Jan; 17(1):3–12.
30.
ChoiB, LaS. The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and customer trust on the restoration of loyalty after service failure and recovery. J Serv Mark. 2013May24; 27(3):223–233.
31.
SharmaAK, TalwarB. Corporate social responsibility: Modern vis-à-vis Vedic approach. Meas Bus Excell. 2005Mar1; 9(1):35–45.
32.
AroraB, PuranikR. A review of corporate social responsibility in India. Development. 2004Sep1; 47(3):93–100.
33.
Delgado-BallesterE, Munuera-AlemánJL. Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. Eur J Mark. 2001; 35(11–12):1238–1258.
34.
SenS, BhattacharyaCB. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J Mark Res. 2001May; 38(2):225–243.
35.
YuCM, WuLY, ChiaoYC, TaiHS. Perceived quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty: The case of Lexus in Taiwan. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell. 2005Aug1; 16(6):707–719.
36.
Cronin JrJJ, TaylorSA. Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. J Mark. 1992Jul; 56(3):55–68.
37.
DuS, BhattacharyaCB, SenS. Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. Int J Res in Mark. 2007Sep1; 24(3):224–241.
38.
FatmaM, RahmanZ.The CSR’s influence on customer responses in Indian banking sector. J Retail Consum Serv. 2016Mar1; 29:49–57.
39.
BhattacharyaCB, KorschunD, SenS. Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics. 2009Apr1; 85(2):257–272.
40.
BlomqvistK. The many faces of trust. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 1997Sep1; 13(3):271–286.
41.
FatmaM, RahmanZ, KhanI. Multi-item stakeholder based scale to measure CSR in the banking industry. International Strategic Management Review. 2014Jun1; 2(1):9–20.
42.
FreemanRE. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman, 1984.
43.
GhoshS. A study of the participation of the private sector companies of India in corporate social responsibility activities through conjoint analysis. Vision. 2014Jun; 18(2):91–108.
44.
HolmesJH, KilbaneCJ. Cause-related marketing: Selected effects of price and charitable donations. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing. 1993Oct14; 1(4):67–84.
45.
MaqboolS. Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? Evidence from BSE 100 index. DECISION. 2019Sep1; 46(3):219–231.
46.
MaqboolS, ZameerMN. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Future Bus Journal. 2018Jun1; 4(1):84–93.
47.
MaqboolS, ZamirMN. Corporate social responsibility reporting in India: A study of SENSEX companies. Manage Labour Stud. 2019May; 44(2):209–223.
48.
MaqboolS, RasoolH, BusruSA. Corporate social responsibility disclosure: A study of Indian commercial banks. Asian J Res in Bank Finance. 2018; 8(6):73–83.
SenS, BhattacharyaCB. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of marketing Research. 2001May; 38(2): 225–243.
