Human touch (“warm fuzzy”) has a tremendous potential to communicate and heal. Although body touching is measured and conditioned in the clinical world, in the folk tradition, it is spontaneous and grounded in experiences of intersubjectivity. Watching numerous medical encounters in an Indian rural setting, we confirm haptic modalities are not just therapeutic but help patients and healers to deeply engage in intersubjective interactions. It is an emotional journey of patients and healers who come close to each other through the sequential process of experiencing “being-apart-from-oneanother,” followed by the feeling of “being-with-one-another,” “being-withinone-another,” and finally “being-for-one-another.” We believe intersubjectivity is the key to healing that starts with free body touching; it is the healing praxis of modern times.
BeiE., MorrisonV., ZarzyckiM., & VilchinskyN. (2023). Barriers, facilitators, and motives to provide distance care, and the consequences for distance caregivers: A mixed-methods systematic review. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 321, 115782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115782
2.
CekaiteA., & MondadaL. (2020). Touch in social interaction: Touch, language and body. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
3.
CoanJ. A., SchaeferH. S., & DavidsonR. J. (2006). Lending a hand: Social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1032–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01832
4.
ConnorA., & HowettM. (2009). A conceptual model of intentional comfort touch. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 27(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010109333337
5.
CsordasT. J. (2008). Intersubjectivity and intercorporeality. Subjectivity, 22(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.5
6.
Cultural Research Institute. (2018). Traditional healthcare practices of Scheduled Tribes in West Bengal (2018–19)(Unpublished report). Backward Class Welfare & Tribal Development Department, Government of West Bengal.
7.
DuttaP. (2018). Health and healing in colonial Bengal: The Christian Missionaries and the imperial impact. Vidyasagar University Journal of History, 6, 87–95.
8.
FairhurstM. T., LokenL. & GrossmannT. (2014). Physiological and behavioral responses reveal 9-month-old infants’ sensitivity to pleasant touch. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614527114
9.
GhoshD., & MandalM. (2015). Spatial analysis of health care facility: A block level study in Birbhum District, West Bengal. Journal of Environment and Sociobiology, 191–200.
10.
HardimanD. (2017). Missionaries and their medicine: A Christian modernity for tribal India. Manchester University Press.
11.
HardimanD., & MukharjiP. B. (2012). Introduction. In HardimanD. & MukharjiP. B. (Eds.), Medical marginality in South Asia: Situating subaltern therapeutics (pp. 6–35). Routledge.
12.
HatiK. K., & MajumderR. (2011). Health for development: A district level study in West Bengal(MPRA Paper No. 45849). Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45849/
13.
IrvingG., NevesA. L., Dambha-MillerH., OishiA., TagashiraH., VerhoA., & HoldenJ. (2017). International variations in primary care physician consultation time: A systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open, 7(10), e017902. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902
14.
Jackson-KinmanM. (2017, July1). Ayurvedic Marma therapy—Healing through touch. California College of Ayurveda. https://www.ayurvedacollege.com/blog/ayurvedic-marma-therapy-healing-through-touch/
15.
JoshiP. (2023). Practice and praxis: A critical look at medical anthropology in India. In ReddyS., GuiteN., & SubediB. (Eds.), Ethnomedicine and tribal healing practices in India: Challenges and possibilities of recognition and integration. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4286-0
16.
KellyM. A., NixonL., McClurgC., ScherpbierA., KingN., & DornanT. (2017). Experience of touch in health care: A meta-ethnography across the health care professions. Qualitative Health Research, 28(2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317707726
17.
KhanS. (2006). Systems of medicine and nationalist discourse in India: Towards “new horizons” in medical anthropology and history. Social Science & Medicine, 62(11), 2786–2797.
18.
KoenigH. G. (2000). Religion and medicine I: Historical background and reasons for separation. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 30(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.2190/2RWB-3AE1-M1E5-TVHK
19.
LambertH. (2018). Indian therapeutic hierarchies and the politics of recognition. Asian Medicine, 13(1–2), 115–133.
20.
LeonardK. E., & KalmanM. A. (2015). The meaning of touch to patients undergoing chemotherapy. Oncology Nursing Forum, 42, 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1188/15.ONF.517-526
21.
LevinD. M., & SolomonG. F. (1990). The discursive formation of the body in the history of medicine. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 15(5), 515–537.
22.
ManciniF., NashT., IannettiG. D., & HaggardP. (2014). Pain relief by touch: A quantitative approach. Pain, 155(3), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.024
23.
ModakB. P., GoraiP., DhanR., MukherjeeA., & DeyA. (2015). Tradition in treating taboo: Folkloric medicinal wisdom of the aboriginals of Purulia district, West Bengal, India against sexual, gynaecological and related disorders. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 169, 370–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.04.020
24.
PattersonT. (2001). The interaction of Indian medicine and modern medicine (colonial period). In SubbarayappaB. V. (Ed.), Medicine and life sciences in India (pp. 574–605). Centre for Studies in Civilizations.
25.
PawlingR., CannonP. R., McGloneF. P., & WalkerS. C. (2017). C-tactile afferent stimulating touch carries a positive affective value. PLoS One, 12(3), e0173457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173457
26.
PolsJ. (2012). Care at a distance: On the closeness of technology. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01529
27.
SundinK., & JanssonL. (2003). Understanding and being understood as a creative caring phenomenon--in care of patients with stroke and aphasia. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00676.x
28.
QuintnerJ., GalbraithM., & RuthrofH. (2018, December29). Intersubjectivity in clinical encounters. Australian Pain Society. https://blog.apsoc.org.au/2019/05/06/intersubjectivity-in-clinical-encounters/
29.
RaiS. K. (2019). Brahmanizing Ayurveda: Caste and class dimensions of late colonial Ayurvedic movement in upper India. Summerhill, 25(2), 4.
30.
SainiA. (2016). Physicians of colonial India (1757-1900). Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 5(3), 528–532. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.197257
31.
SinghC., & LederD. (2012). Touch in the consultation. The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 62(596), 147–148. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X630133
32.
Uvnäs-MobergK., HandlinL., & PeterssonM. (2015). Self-soothing behaviors with particular reference to oxytocin release induced by non-noxious sensory stimulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1529. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01529
33.
VergheseA. (2011). A doctor’s touch(Ted Talk Video). https://www.ted.com/talks/abraham_verghese_a_doctor_s_touch
34.
WilsonM. (1999). A health evangelism strategy for reaching rural Indians with Giffard Memorial Hospital as a model[Professional dissertations DMin 637, Andrews University].
35.
WinklemanM. (2004). Shamanism. In EmberC. R. & EmberM. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of medical anthropology: Health and illness in the world’s culture (pp. 145–154). Springer Science and Business Media.
