Agriculture plays a significant role in economic development of underdeveloped regions. Multiple factors influence the performance of agricultural sector but a few of these have a strong bearing on its growth. This study develops a growth diagnostics framework for agricultural sector in Bihar, located in eastern India, to identify the most binding constraints. The study results show that poor functioning of agricultural markets and low-level of crop diversification are the important reasons for low agricultural growth in Bihar. Rise in price instability of agricultural produces indicates a weak price transmission across the markets even after repealing the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act. Poor market linkages and non-functioning producer collectives at village-level affect the farmers’ motivation for undertaking crop diversification. Hence, policy suggestions to overcome these binding constraints include the state provisioning of basic market infrastructure to attract private investment in agricultural marketing, strengthening the Farmer Producer Organisations, and framing a comprehensive policy on crop diversification.
AcharyaS. S. (2004). State of the Indian farmer: A millennium study (Vol. 14). Academic Foundation.
2.
AcharyaS. S., ChandR., BirthalP. S., KumarS., & NegiD. S. (2012). Market integration and price transmission in India: A case of rice and wheat with special reference to the World Food Crisis of 2007/08. Food and Agriculture Organization.
3.
BanerjiA., & MeenakshiJ. V. (2002). Buyer collusion and efficiency of government intervention in wheat markets in northern India: A symmetric structural auction analysis [Working Paper No. 104]. Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
4.
BiggsS., JusticeS., & LewisD. (2011). Patterns of rural mechanisation, energy and employment in South Asia: Reopening the debate. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(9), 78–82.
5.
BirthalP. S., RoyD., & NegiD. S. (2015). Assessing the impact of crop diversification on farm poverty in India. World Development, 72, 70–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.02.015
6.
ChandR. (2003). Government intervention in foodgrain markets in the new context (Policy Paper No. 19). National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research.
7.
ChandR., & PavithraS. (2015). Fertiliser use and imbalance in India: Analysis of states. Economic & Political Weekly, 50(44), 98–106.
8.
ChandR., PrasannaP. A. L., & SinghA. (2011). Farm size and productivity: Understanding the strengths of smallholders and improving their livelihoods. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(26 and 27), 5–11.
9.
DevS. M. (2012). Small farmers in India: Challenges and opportunities [Working Paper No. 2012–014]. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR).
10.
FuglieK. (2019). International agricultural productivity. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-agricultural-productivity/
11.
FujitaK. (2014). How agriculture in Bihar lagged behind: Implications for future development. In TsujitaY. (Ed.), Inclusive growth and development in India: Challenges for the underdeveloped regions and the Underclass (pp. 40–68). Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
GokarnS., & GulatiG. (2006). India: Country growth analysis. Asian Development Bank.
13.
Government of India. (n.d.a). National accounts statistics. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
14.
Government of India. (n.d.b). Area and production statistics. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES), Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare.
15.
Government of India. (n.d.c). Cost of cultivation/production and related data. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES), Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare.
16.
Government of India. (2008). Bihar’s agriculture development: Opportunities and challenges. Special Task Force on Bihar, Planning Commission.
17.
Government of India. (2013). Report of the committee for evolving a composite development index of States. Ministry of Finance.
18.
Government of India. (2016). Evaluation study on efficacy of minimum support prices (MSP) on farmers (PEO Report No. 231). NITI AAYOG.
19.
Government of India. (2017). Status of farmers: Income and strategies for accelerated growth (Vol. II). Committee on Doubling Farmers’ Income, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare.
20.
GovilR., NetiA., & RaoM. R. (2020). Farmer producer companies: Past, present and future. (Project report). Premji University. http://publications.azimpremjifoundation.org/2268/.Azim
21.
HausmannR., & KlingerB. (2008). Growth diagnostics in Peru [Working Paper No. 181]. Center for International Development, Harvard University. https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/files/growthlab/files/181.pdf.
22.
HausmannR., RodrikD., & VelascoA. (2008a). Growth diagnostics. In SerraN. & StiglitzJ. E. (Eds.), The Washington consensus reconsidered: Towards a new global governance (pp. 324–355). Oxford University Press.
23.
HausmannR., KlingerB., & WagnerR. (2008b). Doing growth diagnostics in practice: A ‘Mindbook’ [Working Paper No. 177]. Center for International Development, Harvard University. https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/files/growthlab/files/177.pdf.
24.
HausmannR., EspinozaL., & SantosM. A. (2017). Shifting gears: A growth diagnostic of Panama [Working Paper No. 325]. Center for International Development, Harvard University. https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/files/growthlab/files/panama_growth_diagnostics_wp_325.pdf.
25.
HazellP. B. R. (2009). The Asian green revolution [Discussion Paper No. 00911]. International Food Policy Research Institute. http://ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/29462/filename/29463.pdf.
26.
HellinJ., & ErensteinO. (2009). Maize-poultry value chains in India: Implications for research and development. Journal of New Seeds, 10(4), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228860903303932
27.
HodaA., RajkhowaP., & GulatiA. (2017). Unleashing Bihar’s agriculture potential: Sources and drivers of agriculture growth [ICRIER Working Paper No. 336]. Indian Council for Research in International Economic Relations. https://icrier.org/pdf/Working_Paper_336.pdf.
28.
IntodiaV. (2012). Investment in agricultural marketing and market infrastructure—A case study of Bihar [Research Report 2011–2012]. National Institute of Agricultural Marketing. https://mail.ccsniam.gov.in/images/pdfs/Final_report_of_Bihar_research_study.pdf.
29.
JhaT. N., & ViswanathanK. U. (1999). Problems and prospects of agricultural development in Bihar (Occasional Paper No. 10). National Bank for agriculture and Rural Development.
30.
JoshiP. K., GulatiA., BirthalP. S., & JoshiL. (2004). Agriculture diversification in South Asia: Patterns, determinants and policy implications. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(24), 2457–2467.
31.
JoshiP. K., BirthalP. S., & MinotN. (2006). Sources of agricultural growth in India: Role of diversification towards high-value crops [Discussion Paper No. 98]. International Food Policy Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.58572.
32.
KannanE. (2015). Trends in agricultural incomes: An analysis at the select crop and state levels in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 15(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12068
33.
KishoreA. (2004). Understanding agrarian impasse in Bihar. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(31), 3484–3491.
34.
MinotN., EpprechtM., Tram AnhT. T., & TrungL. Q. (2006). Income diversification and poverty in Northern Uplands of Vietnam [Research Report No. 145]. International Food Policy Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.2499/0896291480.
35.
MinatoK. (2014). The burden of public inaction: Agrarian impasse in growing Bihar. In TsujitaY. (Ed.), Inclusive growth and development in India: Challenges for the underdeveloped regions and the underclass. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137408747_7.
36.
ObuchiR., LiraB., & RaguáD. (2016). Microeconomic binding constraints on private investment and growth in Venezuela. Center for International Development, Harvard University. https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/files/growthlab/files/microconstraints_venezuela.pdf.
37.
OtsukaK., & YamanoT. (2006). Introduction to the special issue on the role of nonfarm income in poverty reduction: Evidence from Asia and East Africa. Agricultural Economics, 35(s3), 393–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00185.x
38.
PohitS., KannanE., SinghR. K. P., BandyopadhyayS., AlawadhiS., & SayalL. (2019). Study on agricultural diagnostics for the state of Bihar in India. National Council of Applied Economic Research. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5e58f1e0d3bf7f06ffcfec7d/Bihar-Nov_Final_Rev-nov.pdf.
39.
PrasadC. S., & PrateekG. (2019). Farming futures: An annotated bibliography on farmer producer organisations in India [Working Paper No. 290]. Institute of Rural Management Anand.
40.
RahmanS. (2009). Whether crop diversification is a desired strategy for agricultural growth in Bangladesh?Food Policy, 34(4), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.02.004
41.
ReddyA. A., RaniC. R., & ReddyG. P. (2014). Labour scarcity and farm mechanisation: A cross state comparison. SSRN Electronic Journal, 69(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2666935
42.
SarkarG. K. (1986). The fading fabric—I. Raw jute scenario. Economic & Political Weekly, 21(49), 2140–2146.
43.
SenA., & BhatiaM. S. (2004). State of the Indian farmer: A millennium study (Vol. 14). Academic Foundation.
44.
SharmaV. P., & ThakerH. (2010). Fertiliser subsidy in India: Who are the beneficiaries?Economic & Political Weekly, 45(12), 68–76.
ThakurJ., BoseM. L., HossainM., & JanaiahA. (2000). Rural income distribution and poverty in Bihar: Insights from village studies. Economic & Political Weekly, 35(52/53), 4657–4663.
