Environmental, social and governance (ESG) has gotten traction from all the stakeholders of firms, including banks. It is included in many decision-making processes, including financing and investment decisions. However, the relationship of ESG with the firm’s financial distress (FD) is uncertain. This article aims to investigate this uncertain situation using a panel of data from 12 years (2010–2021) from banks in India gathered to test the association between ESG and FD empirically. It is found that ESG does not impact FD. However, the interaction of ESG with banks’ profitability significantly and adversely impacts FD. Determining the association between ESG and FD when profitability moderates the association is a unique contribution, as no other study has been observed. The study’s main implication is to decouple the ESG from the bank’s profitability. The banks should not cross the limit to invest in ESG, even if they are highly profitable, to maintain their financial stability. The lack of multi-country data can be considered a study limitation, which can also be a future scope. The developing countries are expected to have a similar outcome. However, in a prospective study, comparing developing and developed economies would add further value to the topic.
AhamedM. M. (2017). Asset quality, non-interest income, and bank profitability: Evidence from Indian banks. Economic Modelling, 63, 1–14.
2.
AhmedS. U., AhmedS. P., & HasanI. (2018). Why banks should consider ESG risk factors in bank lending?Banks & Bank Systems, 13(3), 71–80.
3.
AlmiliaL. S., & KristijadiK. (2003). Financial ratio analysis to predict financial distress conditions of manufacturing companies listed on the Jakarta Stock Exchange. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Auditing, 7(2), 183–210.
4.
AltmanE. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609.
5.
AltmanE. I., & HotchkissE. (2005). Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy: Predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyse and invest in distressed debt (3rd ed.). Wiley.
6.
Amel-ZadehA., & SerafeimG. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87–103.
7.
AzmiW., HassanM. K., HoustonR., & KarimM. S. (2020). ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions, and Money, 70, 101277.
8.
BaltagiB. H., & BaltagiB. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (Vol. 4). John Wiley & Sons.
9.
BhaskaranR. K., SujitK. S., & MongiaS. (2021). Linkage between performance and sustainability initiatives in banking sector: An empirical examination. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(1), 200–225. 10.1108/IJPPM-07-2020-0385
10.
BillioM., CostolaM., HristovaI., LatinoC., & PelizzonL. (2021). Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1426–1445.
11.
BoadiI., DanaL. P., MertensG., & MensahL. (2017). SMEs’ financing and banks’ profitability: A ‘good date’ for banks in Ghana?Journal of African Business, 18(2), 257–277.
12.
BarrosL. A., BergmannD. R., CastroF. H., & SilveiraA. D. M. D. (2020). Endogeneity in panel data regressions: Methodological guidance for corporate finance researchers. Review of Business Management, 22, 437–461.
13.
BradaJ. C., GajewskiP., & KutanA. M. (2021). Economic resiliency and recovery, lessons from the financial crisis for the COVID-19 pandemic: A regional perspective from Central and Eastern Europe. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 1–12.
14.
BuallayA., FadelS. M., Al-AjmiJ. Y., & SaudagaranS. (2020). Sustainability reporting and performance of MENA banks: Is there a trade-off?Measuring Business Excellence, 24(2), 197–221.
15.
ChenH. C., & YehC. W. (2021). Global financial crisis and COVID-19: Industrial reactions. Finance Research Letters, 42, 101940. 10.1016%2Fj.frl.2021.101940
16.
ChengB., IoannouI., & SerafeimG. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.
17.
ChiaramonteL., DreassiA., GirardoneC., & PiseràS. (2021). Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe. The European Journal of Finance, 28(12),1–39. 10.1080/1351847X.2021.1964556
18.
CloningerD. O. (1995). Managerial goals and ethical behavior. Financial Practice and Education, 5(1), 50–59.
19.
ColanderD., GoldbergM., HaasA., JuseliusK., KirmanA., LuxT., & SlothB. (2009). The financial crisis and the systemic failure of the economics profession. Critical Review, 21(23), 249–267.
20.
CornettM. M., ErhemjamtsO., & TehranianH. (2016). Greed or good deeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of US commercial banks around the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 70, 137–159.
21.
DalalK. K., & ThakerN. (2019). ESG and corporate financial performance: A panel study of Indian companies. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 18(1), 44–59.
22.
DhaliwalD. S., LiO. Z., TsangA., & YangY. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.
23.
Di TommasoC., & ThorntonJ. (2020). Do ESG scores effect bank risk taking and value? Evidence from European banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2286–2298.
24.
FatemiA., GlaumM., & KaiserS. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. 10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
25.
FilbeckA., FilbeckG., & ZhaoX. (2019). Performance assessment of firms following sustainalytics ESG principles. The Journal of Investing, 28(2), 7–20.
26.
FreemanR. E., & McVeaJ. (2005). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In HittM. A., FreemanR. E., & HarrisonJ. S. (Eds), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 183–201). Wiley
27.
GangiF., MelesA., D’AngeloE., & DanieleL. M. (2019). Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 529–547.
28.
GarlappiL., & YanH. (2011). Financial distress and the cross-section of equity returns. The Journal of Finance, 66(3), 789–822.
29.
GillanS., HartzellJ. C., KochA., & StarksL. T. (2010). Firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) choices, performance and managerial motivation [Unpublished working paper, 10]. https://sites.pitt.edu/~awkoch/ESG%20Nov%202010.pdf
30.
HabibA., CostaM. D., HuangH. J., BhuiyanM. B. U., & SunL. (2020). Determinants and consequences of financial distress: Review of the empirical literature. Accounting & Finance, 60(S1), 1023–1075. 10.1111/acfi.12400
31.
HarymawanI., PutraF. K. G., FiantoB. A., & Wan IsmailW. A. (2021). Financially distressed firms: Environmental, social, and governance reporting in Indonesia. Sustainability, 13(18), 10156.
32.
HsiaoC. (1985). Benefits and limitations of panel data. Econometric Reviews, 4(1), 121–174.
HsiaoC. (2007). Panel data analysis: Advantages and challenges. Test, 16(1), 1–22.
35.
IkpesuF. (2019). Firm specific determinants of financial distress: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 11(3), 49–56.
36.
JaiwaniM., & GopalkrishnanS. (2023). Do private and public sector banks respond to ESG in the same way? Some evidence from India. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BIJ-05-2023-0340/full/html
37.
LarteyV. C., AntwiS., & BoadiE. K. (2013). The relationship between net interest margin and return on assets of listed banks in Ghana. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(16), 73–78.
38.
LaunerR. L., & WilkinsonG. N. (Eds). (2014). Robustness in statistics. Academic Press.
39.
LiangH., & RenneboogL. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853–910.
40.
MachanT. R. (2017). Stakeholder vs. shareholder debate: Some skeptical reflections. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 9(1), 7–13.
41.
MadisonN., & SchiehllE. (2021). The effect of financial materiality on ESG performance assessment. Sustainability, 13(7), 3652.
42.
MishraP., & SantT. G. (2023). Examine the level of environmental, social and governance disclosure in sustainability report–a study of the Indian banking sector. International Journal of Innovation Science16(2), 420–442.
43.
MasdupiE., TasmanA., & DavistaA. (2018, July). The influence of liquidity, leverage and profitability on financial distress of listed manufacturing companies in Indonesia. In MasdupiE., TasmanA., & DavistaA. (Eds), First Padang international conference on economics education, economics, business and management, accounting and entrepreneurship (pp. 389–394). Atlantis Press.
44.
MoschR., & PrastH. (2008). Confidence and trust: Empirical investigations for the Netherlands. DNB Occasional Study, 6(2), 1–15.
45.
NarulaK. (2012). ‘Sustainable Investing’ via the FDI route for sustainable development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 37, 15–30.
46.
NeitzertF., & PetrasM. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and bank risk. Journal of Business Economics, 92(3), 397–428.
47.
OkeM. O., & AlukoO. A. (2015). Impact of commercial banks on small and medium enterprises financing in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 17(4), 23–26.
48.
OrlitzkyM. (2013). Corporate social responsibility, noise, and stock market volatility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(3), 238–254.
49.
ParmarB. L., FreemanR. E., HarrisonJ. S., WicksA. C., PurnellL., & De ColleS. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445.
50.
PuspitasariE., SudiyatnoB., HartotoW. E., & WidatiI. W. (2021). Net interest margin and return on assets: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 727–734.
51.
RajeshR., & RajendranC. (2020). Relating environmental, social, and governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1247–1267.
52.
RenneboogL., Ter HorstJ., & ZhangC. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742.
53.
SaïdaneD., & AbdallahS. B. (2020). Sustainability and financial stability: Evidence from European banks. Economics Bull, 40(2), 1769–1780.
54.
SalikeN., & AoB. (2017). Determinants of bank’s profitability: Role of poor asset quality in Asia. China Finance Review International, 8(2), 216–231.
55.
SalehiM., & AbediniB. (2009). Financial distress prediction in emerging market: Empirical evidences from Iran. Business Intelligence Journal, 2(2), 398–409.
56.
SikaczH., & WołczekP. (2018). ESG analysis of companies included in the RESPECT Index based on Thomson Reuters EIKON database. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 520, 115–127.
57.
SmithH. J. (2003). The shareholders vs. stakeholders debate. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 85–90.
58.
TasmanA., & KurniawatiT. (2014). Prediction of financial distress and bankruptcy of property and real estate companies using a multivariate discriminant analysis approach. Journal of Business Management Studies, 3(1), 55–72.
59.
TasmanA., & MasdupiE. (2014). Determinant of financial distress and bankruptcy in miscellaneous industry. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Business and Economics. Thailand.
60.
ThakorA. V. (2015). The financial crisis of 2007–2009: Why did it happen and what did we learn?The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 4(2), 155–205.
61.
van Esterik-PlasmeijerP. W., & van RaaijW. F. (2017). Banking system trust, bank trust, and bank loyalty. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(1), 97–111.
62.
WoodwardJ. (2006). Some varieties of robustness. Journal of Economic Methodology, 13(2), 219–240.
63.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage Learning.
64.
ZadehM. H., MagnanM., CormierD., & HammamiA. (2021). Environmental and social transparency and investment efficiency: The mediating effect of analysts’ monitoring. Journal of Cleaner Production, 322, 128991. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128991
