A cause–brand association (CBA) is a marketing strategy of embedding a social cause in the promotion of a brand. The purpose of this article is to develop a comprehensive model of the determinants and consequences of CBA and to statistically validate the same in the Indian context.
The review of the extant literature put forward eight constructs and the conjectured paths. A structured questionnaire was used to collect primary data from 799 respondents from Mumbai (a metropolitan city in India) through a survey. The conjectured model was statistically tested using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. The results of the study put forward three determinants of attitude towards CBA: (a) Pre-existing attitude towards the brand, (b) Cause affinity and (c) Cause–Brand fit. Further, it was found that CBA has positive effects on post-CBA attitude towards brand and post-CBA attitude towards the cause, which in turn influence purchase intentions and behavioural intentions towards social cause, respectively. Furthermore, the model demonstrated a positive effect of behavioural intentions on purchase intentions.
The article provides useful insights into the important dimensions of CBA that can be utilized to design effective promotion campaigns. This also proposes a model integrating both consequences and determinants of CBA.
AdiwijayaK., & FauzanR. (2012). Cause–related marketing: The influence of cause brand fit, firm motives and attribute altruistic to consumer inferences and loyalty and moderation effect of consumer values. In 2012 International Conference of Economics Marketing and Management (Vol. 28, pp. 49–54).
2.
AndersonJ. C. (1981). Integration theory applied to cognitive responses and attitudes. In PettyR. E., OstromT. M., & BrockT. C. (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 361–397). Erlbaum.
3.
AnridhoN., & LiaoY. K. (2013). The mediation roles of brand credibility and attitude on the performance of cause-related marketing. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 4(1), 226–276.
4.
AnuarM. M., & AdamF. (2017). Does cause-proximity matters in cause-related marketing?. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 790–800.
5.
AroraN., & HendersonT. (2007). Embedded premium promotion: Why it works and how to make it more effective. Marketing Science, 26(4), 514–531. https://doi/org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0247
6.
BaghiI., & GabrielliV. (2012). Co-branded cause-related marketing campaigns: The importance of linking two strong brands. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10(1), 13–29.
7.
BaroneM. J., NormanA. T., & MiyazakiA. D. (2007). Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better?Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437–445.
8.
BasilD. Z., & HerrP. M. (2006). Attitudinal balance and cause-related marketing: An empirical application of balance theory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 391–403.
9.
Becker-OlsenK. L., CudmoreB. A., & HillR. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001
10.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
11.
BergerI. E., CunninghamP. H., & KozinetsR. V. (1999). Consumer persuasion through cause-related marketing. Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 491–497.
12.
BergkvistL., & ZhouK. Q. (2018). Cause-related marketing persuasion research: An integrated framework and directions for further research. International Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1452397
13.
BhattacharyaC., & SenS. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.
14.
Bigné-AlcañizE., Currás-PérezR., & Sánchez-GarcíaI. (2009). Brand credibility in cause-related marketing: The moderating role of consumer values. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(6), 437–447.
15.
BowerA. B., & GrauL. (2009). Explicit donations and inferred endorsements. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 113–126.
16.
BronnP. S., & VrioniA. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: an overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207–222. https://doi/org/10.1080/02650487.2001.11104887
17.
BrinkD. V., Odekerken-SchröderG., & PauwelsP. (2006). The effect of strategic and tactical cause-related marketing on consumers brand loyalty. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 15–25. https://doi/org/10.1108/07363760610641127
18.
ChangC. T. (2011). Guilt Appeals in cause-related marketing: The subversive roles of product type and donation magnitude. International Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 587–616.
19.
ChenZ., & HuangY. (2016). Cause-related marketing is not always less favorable than corporate philanthropy: The moderating role of self-construal. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(4), 868–880. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.03.003
20.
ChéronE., KohlbacherF., & KusumaK. (2012). The effects of brand-cause fit and campaign duration on consumer perception of cause-related marketing in Japan. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(5), 357–368.
21.
ChristofiM., LeonidouE., VrontisD., KitchenP., & PapasolomouI. (2015). Innovation and cause-related marketing success: A conceptual framework and propositions. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(5), 354–366. https://doi/org/10.1108/jsm-04-2014-0114
22.
CuiY., TrentE. S., SullivanP. M., & MatiruG. N. (2003). Cause-related marketing: How generation Y responds. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(6), 310–320.
23.
DahlD. W., & LavackA. M. (1995). Cause-related marketing: Impact of size of corporate donation and size of cause-related promotion on consumer perceptions and participation. In AMA winter educators’ conference proceedings (Vol. 6, pp. 476–481).
24.
DeanD. H. (2003). Consumer perception of corporate donations—Effects of company reputation for social responsibility and type of donation. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 91–102. https://doi/org/10.1080/00913367.2003.10639149
25.
DengX., & XuY. (2015). Consumers’ responses to corporate social responsibility initiatives: The mediating role of consumer–company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), 515–526.
26.
DrumwrightM. E. (1996). Company advertising with a social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 71–87.
27.
DuS., BhattacharyaC., & SenS. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi/org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
28.
EdmondsonD. R., & LaffertyB. A. (2007). Cause related marketing: A model of consumer’s attitude toward the cause-brand alliance. Distinguished Teaching Competition-Sponsored by Sherwin-Williams, 67, 20–23.
29.
EdmondsonD. R., & LaffertyB. A. (2014). A model of relevant antecedents and outcome variables for cause-related marketing. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 14, 1–13.
30.
EikenberryA. M. (2013). A critical case study of cause-related marketing. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(2), 290–305.
31.
FerleC. L., KuberG., & EdwardsS. M. (2013). Factors impacting responses to cause-Related marketing in India and the United States: Novelty, altruistic motives, and company origin. Journal of Business Research, 66(3), 364–373.
32.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3151312
33.
FuljahnA., & MoosmayerD. C. (2011). The myth of guilt: A replication study on the suitability of hedonic and utilitarian products for cause related marketing campaigns in Germany. International Journal of Business Research, 11(1), 85–92.
34.
GoldsmithE. R., & YiminZ. (2014). The influences of brand-consumer and cause-congruence on consumer responses to cause related marketing. Journal of Applied Marketing Theory, 5(2), 74–95.
35.
GrauS. L., & FolseJ. A. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33.
36.
GuerreiroJ., RitaP., & TrigueirosD. (2015). A text mining-based review of cause-related marketing literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 111–128. https://doi/org/10.1007/s10551-015-2622-4
37.
GuptaS., & PirschJ. (2006). The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314–326.
38.
Hair Jr.J. F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., & AndersonR. E. (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
39.
HamlinR., & WilsonT. (2004). The impact of cause branding on consumer reactions to products: Does product/cause fit really matter?Journal of Marketing Management, 20(7–8), 663–681.
40.
HawkinsR. (2015). Shifting conceptualizations of ethical consumption: Cause-related marketing in India and the USA. Geoforum, 67, 172–182.
41.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. A reduced photographic reprint of the edition of 1958. John Wiley & Sons.
42.
HoefflerS., & KellerK. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 78–89. https://doi/org/10.1509/jppm.21.1.78.17600
43.
HouJ., DuL., & LiJ. (2008). Causes attributes influencing consumers purchasing intention: Empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 363–380.
44.
HuL. T., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
45.
Huertas-GarcíaR., LenglerJ., & Consolación-SeguraC. (2017). Co-branding strategy in cause-related advertising: The fit between brand and cause. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(2), 135–150.
46.
HyllegardK. H., YanR., OgleJ. P., & AttmannJ. (2010). The influence of gender, social cause, charitable support, and message appeal on gen Y’s responses to cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(1–2), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02672571003683755
47.
India CSR Network. (n.d.). CSR is an acceptable marketing tool, says Lowe Lintas Survey. https://www.exchange4media.com/Marketing/CSR-is-an-acceptable-marketingtool-says-Lowe-Lintas-Survey_43017.html
48.
KerrA. H., & DasN. (2013). Thinking about fit and donation format in cause marketing: the effects of need for cognition. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 21(1), 103–112.
49.
KimH. J., KimJ., & HanW. H. (2005). The effects of cause-related marketing on company and brand attitudes. Seoul Journal of Business, 11(2), 85–117.
50.
KimN., SungY., & LeeM. (2012). Consumer evaluations of social alliances: The effects of perceived fit between companies and non-profit organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 163–174.
51.
KotlerP., & LeeN. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Wiley India Pvt Ltd.
52.
KotlerP., & LeeN. (2005). Best of breed: When it comes to gaining a market edge while supporting a social cause, ‘corporate social marketing’ leads the pack. Social Marketing Quarterly, 11(3–4), 91–103. https://doi/org/10.1080/15245000500414480
53.
KotlerP., HessekielD. & LeeN. (2012). Good works!Wiley India Pvt Ltd.
54.
KroppF., HoldenS. J., & LavackA. M. (1999). Cause-related marketing and values in Australia. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 4(1), 69–80. https://doi/org/10.1002/nvsm.57
55.
KumarD., & BansalH. (2017). Influence of cause brand fit on consumers purchase intention. International Journal of Research in Finance and Marketing, 7(1), 99–107.
56.
LaderoM. M., CasquetC. G., & SinghJ. (2014). Understanding factors influencing consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(1), 52–70.
57.
LaffertyB. A. (2007). The relevance of fit in a cause–brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 447–453. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.030
58.
LaffertyB. A. (2009). Selecting the right cause partners for the right reasons: The role of importance and fit in cause-brand alliances. Psychology and Marketing, 26(4), 359–382.
59.
LaffertyB. A., & EdmondsonD. R. (2009). Portraying the cause instead of the brand in cause-related marketing ADS: Does it really matter?The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(2), 129–144.
60.
LaffertyB. A., & EdmondsonD. R. (2014). A note on the role of cause type in cause-related marketing. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1455–1460.
61.
LaffertyB. A., & GoldsmithR. E. (2005). Cause–brand alliances: Does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause?Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 423–429. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.07.001
62.
LaffertyB. A., GoldsmithR. E., & HultG. T. (2004). The impact of the alliance on the partners: A look at cause-brand alliances. Psychology and Marketing, 21(7), 509–531.
63.
LiuG., & KoW. (2010). An analysis of cause-related marketing implementation strategies through social alliance: Partnership conditions and strategic objectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 253–281. https://doi/org/10.1007/s10551-010-0679-7
64.
MeleroI., & MontanerT. (2016). Cause-related marketing: An experimental study about how the product type and the perceived fit may influence the consumer response. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(3), 161–167.
65.
MoosmayerD. C., & FuljahnA. (2010). Consumer perceptions of cause related marketing campaigns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(6), 543–549.
66.
NanX., & HeoK. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63–74.
67.
NatarajanT., BalasubramaniamS. A., & JubleeD. I. (2016). A journey of cause related marketing from 1988 to 2016. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(11), 247–267.
NejatiM., AmranA., & WenG. T. (2015). Cause-related marketing: Uncovering the myth. International Journal of Management Practice, 8(1), 57–69.
70.
OlsenG. D., PracejusJ. W., & BrownN. R. (2003). When profit equals price: Consumer confusion about donation amounts in cause-related marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22(2), 170–180.
71.
PatelJ. D., GadhaviD. D., & ShuklaY. S. (2016). Consumers’ responses to cause related marketing: Moderating influence of cause involvement and skepticism on attitude and purchase intention. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi/org/10.1007/s12208-016-0151-1
72.
PirschJ., GuptaS., & GrauS. L. (2006). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 125–140. https://doi/org/10.1007/s10551-006-9100-y
73.
PracejusJ. W., & OlsenG. (2004). The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 635–640. https://doi/org/10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00306-5
74.
PracejusJ. W., OlsenG. D., & BrownN. R. (2003). On the prevalence and impact of vague quantifiers in the advertising of cause-related marketing (CRM). Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 19–28. Pracejushttps://doi/org/10.1080/00913367.2003.10639146
75.
RegoM. M., HamiltonM. A., & RogersD. (2020). Measuring the impact of cause-related marketing: A meta-analysis of nonprofit and for-profit alliance campaigns. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 33(4), 434–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2020.1726253
76.
RifonN. J., ChoiS. M., TrimbleC. S., & LiH. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 30–42.
77.
RohitD., & PandaR. (2018a). Cause-brand association: A review. Journal of Management Research, 18(1), 13–26.
78.
RohitD., & PandaR. (2018b). Cause-brand association and consumer attitude: A review. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 9(1), 61–71.
79.
RohitD., & PandaR. (2020). Cause-brand association (CBA): An empirical investigation into millennials in India. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 19(1), 29–49. https://doi/org/10.1362/147539220x15874775191967
80.
RossJ. K., PattersonL. T., & StuttsM. A. (1992). Consumer perceptions of organizations that use cause-related marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 93–97. https://doi/org/10.1007/BF02723480
81.
RoyD. P. (2010). The impact of congruence in cause marketing campaigns for service firms. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(3), 255–263.
82.
SamuS., & WymerW. (2009). The effect of fit and dominance in cause marketing communications. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 432–440.
83.
SamuS., & WymerW. (2014). Cause marketing communications. European Journal of Marketing, 48(7/8), 1333–1353.
SenS., & BhattacharyaC. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.
86.
SenS., DuS., & BhattacharyaC. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: A consumer psychology perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 70–75.
87.
ShabbirS., KaufmannH. R., AhmadI., & QureshiI. M. (2010). Cause related marketing campaigns and consumer purchase intentions: The mediating role of brand awareness and corporate image. African Journal of Business Management, 4(6), 1229–1235.
88.
SheikhS., & Beise-ZeeR. (2011). Corporate social responsibility or cause-related marketing? The role of cause specificity of CSR. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 27–39.
89.
SimoninB. L., & RuthJ. A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30.
90.
SinghS., & DhirS. (2019). Structured review using TCCM and bibliometric analysis of international cause-related marketing, social marketing, and innovation of the firm. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 16(2–4), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00233-3
91.
StrahilevitzM. (1999). The effects of product type and donation magnitude on willingness to pay more for a charity-linked brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215–241.
92.
StrahilevitzM., & MyersJ. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.
93.
SubrahmanyanS. (2004). Effects of price premium and product type on the choice of cause-related brands: A Singapore perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(2), 116–124. https://doi/org/10.1108/10610420410529744
94.
ThamaraiselvanN., ArasuB. S., & InbarajJ. D. (2017). Role of celebrity in cause related marketing. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 14(3), 341–357. https://doi/org/10.1007/s12208-017-0176-0
95.
ThomasM. L., FraedrichJ. P., & MullenL. G. (2011). Successful cause-related marketing partnering as a means to aligning corporate and philanthropic goals: An empirical study. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 15(2), 113–132.
96.
ThomasS. (2021). Determinants of cause-related marketing participation intention: The role of consumer knowledge, cause scope and donation proximity. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2021.1970077
97.
ThomasS., & JadejaA. (2021). Psychological antecedents of consumer trust in CRM campaigns and donation intentions: The moderating role of creativity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102589
98.
ThomasS., & KureshiS. (2020). Consumer skepticism towards cause related marketing: Exploring the consumer tendency to question from emerging market perspective. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 17(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00244-5
99.
ThomasS., KureshiS., & VatavwalaS. (2020). Cause-related marketing research (1988–2016): An academic review and classification. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 32(5), 488–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2019.1606757
100.
TillB. D., & NowakL. I. (2000). Toward effective use of cause-related marketing alliances. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(7), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420010351394
101.
TrimbleC., & HolmesG. (2013). New thinking on antecedents to successful CRM campaigns: Consumer acceptance of an alliance. Journal of Promotion Management, 19(3), 352–372. https://doi/org/10.1080/10496491.2013.787381
VaradarajanP. R., & MenonA. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58.
104.
VrontisD., ChristofiM., & KatsikeasC. S. (2020). An assessment of the literature on cause-related marketing: Implications for international competitiveness and marketing research. International Marketing Review, 37(5), 977–1012. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-07-2019-0202
105.
VyraveneR., & RabbaneeF. K. (2016). Dealing with corporate negative publicity: The role cause related marketing. Australasian Marketing Journal, 24(4), 322–330.
106.
WebbD. J., & MohrL. A. (1998) A typology of consumer responses to cause related marketing: From skeptics to socially. Journal of Public Policy Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.
107.
WestbergK., & PopeN. (2005, December). An examination of cause-related marketing in the context of brand attitude, purchase intention, perceived fit and personal values. In Proceedings of the ANZMAC 2005 Conference: Social, Not-for-profit and Political Marketing (pp. 222–230). Griffith University.
108.
WymerW., & SargeantA. (2006). Insights from a review of the literature on cause marketing. International Review on Public and Non Profit Marketing, 3(1), 9–15.
109.
YounS., & KimH. (2008). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1), 123–137.
110.
ZdravkovicS., MagnussonP., & StanleyS. M. (2010). Dimensions of fit between a brand and a social cause and their influence on attitudes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(2), 151–160. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.01.005
