As a widely practiced form of corporate social responsibility (CSR), cause-related marketing (CRM) programs have been considered effective in generating reputational, relational, and financial returns for companies. This study examines a new form of CRM: choice-of-cause programs, in which companies empower consumers to determine which social causes to support. Based on self-determination theory, reputation management literature, and CSR research, this study proposes a conceptual framework that theorizes the effectiveness of the choice program, mapping out consumers’ psychological experiences and consequential attitudinal and behavioral intention responses toward companies and their nonprofit partners. Results of an online experiment offer partial support to the framework. They showed the relative advantage of the choice program over traditional cause-without-choice practice and highlighted the importance of creating an autonomy-supportive CSR program environment where consumers can exercise self-determination. Furthermore, results demonstrated the crucial role of corporate reputation in influencing consumer responses in CSR programs.
BaardP. P.DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
2.
BaeJ.CameronG. T. (2006). Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.02.007
3.
BarnettM. L.LeihS. (2018). Sorry to (not) burst your bubble: The influence of reputation rankings on perceptions of firms. Business & Society, 57(5), 962-978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316643919
4.
BotanC. H. (2018). Strategic communication theory and practice: The cocreational model. Wiley Blackwell.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024-1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
7.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
8.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M.GagnéM.LeoneD. R.UsunovJ.KornazhevaB. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002
9.
DevinB. L.LaneA. B. (2014). Communicating engagement in corporate social responsibility: A meta-level construal of engagement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 436-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.956104
10.
EdwardsS. M.LiH.LeeJ. H. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673678
11.
ElvingW. J. (2013). Scepticism and corporate social responsibility communications: The influence of fit and reputation. Journal of Marketing Communications, 19(4), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2011.631569
12.
FombrunC.GardbergN. A.SeverJ. (2000). The reputation quotient: A multistakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2000.10
13.
FriestadM.WrightP. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1086/209380
14.
GagnéM. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199-223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869
15.
GuerreiroJ.RitaP.TrigueirosD. (2016). A text mining-based review of cause-related marketing literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2622-4
16.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
17.
HowieK. M.YangL.VitellS. J.BushV.VorhiesD. (2018). Consumer participation in cause-related marketing: An examination of effort demands and defensive denial. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 679-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2961-1
18.
HsiehS. H.ChangA. (2016). The psychological mechanism of brand co-creation engagement. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 33(February), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2015.10.001
19.
HurW. M.KimH.JangJ. H. (2016). The role of gender differences in the impact of CSR perceptions on corporate marketing outcomes. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1380
20.
IrmakC.SenS.BhattacharyaC. B. (2015). Consumer reactions to business-nonprofit alliances: Who benefits and when?Marketing Letters, 26(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9265-y
21.
KimK.CheongY.LimJ. S. (2015). Choosing the right message for the right cause in social cause advertising: Type of social cause message, perceived company–cause fit and the persuasiveness of communication. International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 473-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1006081
KimY. (2014). Strategic communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Effects of stated motives and corporate reputation on stakeholder responses. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 838-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.005
25.
KullA. J.HeathT. B. (2016). You decide, we donate: Strengthening consumer–brand relationships through digitally co-created social responsibility. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.04.005
26.
LichtensteinD. R.DrumwrightM. E.BraigB. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.16.42726
27.
LiiY. S.LeeM. (2012). Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0948-0
MilyavskayaM.KoestnerR. (2011). Psychological needs, motivation, and well-being: A test of self-determination theory across multiple domains. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 387-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.029
30.
MoosmayerD. C.FuljahnA. (2010). Consumer perceptions of cause related marketing campaigns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(6), 543-549. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011078280
31.
MorsingM.SchultzM. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
32.
PaveyL.GreitemeyerT.SparksP. (2011). Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 905-917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405994
33.
RimH.SongD. (2013). The ability of corporate blog communication to enhance CSR effectiveness: The role of prior company reputation and blog responsiveness. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(3), 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2012.738743
34.
RimH.YangS. U.LeeJ. (2016). Strategic partnerships with nonprofits in corporate social responsibility (CSR): The mediating role of perceived altruism and organizational identification. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3213-3219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.035
35.
RobinsonS. R.IrmakC.JayachandranS. (2012). A cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.0589
36.
RoosensB.DensN. (2019). When do social alliances pay off? How the effect on corporate image depends on consumers’ prosocial attitudes. Journal of Brand Management, 26(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0126-0
37.
Ruiz de MayaS.Lardín-ZambudioR.López-LópezI. (2016). I will do it if I enjoy it! The moderating effect of seeking sensory pleasure when exposed to participatory CSR campaigns. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1940. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01940
38.
RyanR. M.ConnellJ. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
39.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
40.
SenS.BhattacharyaC. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838
41.
SmithK. T. (2017). Longitudinal analysis of corporate social responsibility on company websites. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490616686957
42.
TaoW. (2018). How consumers’ pre-crisis associations and attitude certainty impact their responses to different crises. Communication Research, 45(6), 815-839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217733361
43.
TaoW.FergusonM. A. (2015). The overarching effects of ethical reputation regardless of CSR cause fit and information source. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2014.954285
44.
TaoW.SongB.FergusonM. A.KochharS. (2018). Employees’ prosocial behavioral intentions through empowerment in CSR decision-making. Public Relations Review, 44(5), 667-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.002
45.
van der Kaap-DeederJ.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB.MabbeE. (2017). Children’s daily well-being: The role of mothers’, teachers’, and siblings’ autonomy support and psychological control. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000218
46.
VaradarajanP. R.MenonA. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200306
47.
WeinerB. (2012). An attribution theory of motivation. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 135-155). Sage.
48.
WeinsteinN.RyanR. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222-244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984
49.
YoonY.Gürhan-CanliZ.SchwarzN. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377-390. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
