Firm-Determined or Consumer-Determined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)? Examining the Effects of Choice-of-Cause in Cause-Related Marketing

Abstract

As a widely practiced form of corporate social responsibility (CSR), cause-related marketing (CRM) programs have been considered effective in generating reputational, relational, and financial returns for companies. This study examines a new form of CRM: choice-of-cause programs, in which companies empower consumers to determine which social causes to support. Based on self-determination theory, reputation management literature, and CSR research, this study proposes a conceptual framework that theorizes the effectiveness of the choice program, mapping out consumers’ psychological experiences and consequential attitudinal and behavioral intention responses toward companies and their nonprofit partners. Results of an online experiment offer partial support to the framework. They showed the relative advantage of the choice program over traditional cause-without-choice practice and highlighted the importance of creating an autonomy-supportive CSR program environment where consumers can exercise self-determination. Furthermore, results demonstrated the crucial role of corporate reputation in influencing consumer responses in CSR programs.

Keywords

corporate social responsibility cause-related marketing choice of cause self-determination theory corporate reputation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baard

P. P.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x

Bae

Cameron

G. T.

(2006). Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.02.007

Barnett

M. L.

Leih

(2018). Sorry to (not) burst your bubble: The influence of reputation rankings on perceptions of firms. Business & Society, 57(5), 962-978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316643919

Botan

C. H.

(2018). Strategic communication theory and practice: The cocreational model. Wiley Blackwell.

Cone Communication. (2008). Cone releases first cause consumer behavior study. https://www.conecomm.com/news-blog/cone-releases-first-cause-consumer-behavior-study

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024-1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

Gagné

Leone

D. R.

Usunov

Kornazheva

B. P.

(2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002

Devin

B. L.

Lane

A. B.

(2014). Communicating engagement in corporate social responsibility: A meta-level construal of engagement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 436-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.956104

10.

Edwards

S. M.

Lee

J. H.

(2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673678

11.

Elving

W. J.

(2013). Scepticism and corporate social responsibility communications: The influence of fit and reputation. Journal of Marketing Communications, 19(4), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2011.631569

12.

Fombrun

Gardberg

N. A.

Sever

(2000). The reputation quotient: A multistakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2000.10

13.

Friestad

Wright

(1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1086/209380

14.

Gagné

(2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199-223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869

15.

Guerreiro

Rita

Trigueiros

(2016). A text mining-based review of cause-related marketing literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2622-4

16.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

17.

Howie

K. M.

Yang

Vitell

S. J.

Bush

Vorhies

(2018). Consumer participation in cause-related marketing: An examination of effort demands and defensive denial. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 679-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2961-1

18.

Hsieh

S. H.

Chang

(2016). The psychological mechanism of brand co-creation engagement. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 33(February), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2015.10.001

19.

Hur

W. M.

Kim

Jang

J. H.

(2016). The role of gender differences in the impact of CSR perceptions on corporate marketing outcomes. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1380

20.

Irmak

Sen

Bhattacharya

C. B.

(2015). Consumer reactions to business-nonprofit alliances: Who benefits and when? Marketing Letters, 26(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9265-y

21.

Kim

Cheong

Lim

J. S.

(2015). Choosing the right message for the right cause in social cause advertising: Type of social cause message, perceived company–cause fit and the persuasiveness of communication. International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 473-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1006081

22.

Kim

Ferguson

M. T.

(2014). Public expectations of CSR communication: What and how to communicate CSR. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1-22. https://bellisario.psu.edu/assets/uploads/2014KIMFERGUSON.pdf

23.

Kim

Lee

Y. J.

(2012). The complex attribution process of CSR motives. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 168-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.09.024

24.

Kim

(2014). Strategic communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Effects of stated motives and corporate reputation on stakeholder responses. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 838-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.005

25.

Kull

A. J.

Heath

T. B.

(2016). You decide, we donate: Strengthening consumer–brand relationships through digitally co-created social responsibility. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.04.005

26.

Lichtenstein

D. R.

Drumwright

M. E.

Braig

B. M.

(2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.16.42726

27.

Lii

Y. S.

Lee

(2012). Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0948-0

28.

Mason

Suri

(2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6

29.

Milyavskaya

Koestner

(2011). Psychological needs, motivation, and well-being: A test of self-determination theory across multiple domains. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 387-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.029

30.

Moosmayer

D. C.

Fuljahn

(2010). Consumer perceptions of cause related marketing campaigns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(6), 543-549. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011078280

31.

Morsing

Schultz

(2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x

32.

Pavey

Greitemeyer

Sparks

(2011). Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 905-917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405994

33.

Rim

Song

(2013). The ability of corporate blog communication to enhance CSR effectiveness: The role of prior company reputation and blog responsiveness. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(3), 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2012.738743

34.

Rim

Yang

S. U.

Lee

(2016). Strategic partnerships with nonprofits in corporate social responsibility (CSR): The mediating role of perceived altruism and organizational identification. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3213-3219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.035

35.

Robinson

S. R.

Irmak

Jayachandran

(2012). A cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.0589

36.

Roosens

Dens

(2019). When do social alliances pay off? How the effect on corporate image depends on consumers’ prosocial attitudes. Journal of Brand Management, 26(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0126-0

37.

Ruiz de Maya

Lardín-Zambudio

López-López

(2016). I will do it if I enjoy it! The moderating effect of seeking sensory pleasure when exposed to participatory CSR campaigns. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1940. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01940

38.

Ryan

R. M.

Connell

J. P.

(1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749

39.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

40.

Sen

Bhattacharya

C. B.

(2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838

41.

Smith

K. T.

(2017). Longitudinal analysis of corporate social responsibility on company websites. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490616686957

42.

Tao

(2018). How consumers’ pre-crisis associations and attitude certainty impact their responses to different crises. Communication Research, 45(6), 815-839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217733361

43.

Tao

Ferguson

M. A.

(2015). The overarching effects of ethical reputation regardless of CSR cause fit and information source. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2014.954285

44.

Tao

Song

Ferguson

M. A.

Kochhar

(2018). Employees’ prosocial behavioral intentions through empowerment in CSR decision-making. Public Relations Review, 44(5), 667-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.002

45.

van der Kaap-Deeder

Vansteenkiste

Soenens

Mabbe

. (2017). Children’s daily well-being: The role of mothers’, teachers’, and siblings’ autonomy support and psychological control. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000218

46.

Varadarajan

P. R.

Menon

(1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200306

47.

Weiner

(2012). An attribution theory of motivation. In Van Lange

P. A. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Higgins

E. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 135-155). Sage.

48.

Weinstein

Ryan

R. M.

(2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222-244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984

49.

Yoon

Gürhan-Canli

Schwarz

(2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377-390. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB